I disagree, but whatever. Different ways of interpreting it I suppose.Stasisesque said:That still doesn't mean "Muggle" is ever used as a racial slur in the books. The Death Eaters and certain Ministry officials certainly believe the magical community are better than Muggles, but their name never became a slur. Mudblood, however, was referenced time and time again as being the racial slur.jprf said:If you look at the later books, the dark wizards certainly treat 'muggle' as a slur- they see them as lower forms of life, creatures to be eradicated. I always saw it as kind of a holocaust reference.Stasisesque said:Uhm, Muggle is not a racial slur in the books. They even have "Muggle Studies". You're thinking of Mudblood.jprf said:Remember Lord of the Rings, the granddaddy of modern fantasy? British, not particularly cute.
And 'muggle' is actually kind of a racial slur withing the Harry Potter universe. The word itself is a tad strange (originally the books were for a very young audience), but the connotations are anything but cute.
So yeah, I join with my countrymen in asking what the hell?
Yeah, I'm a massive geek.
And I don't like to have to watch a bloody ad just to get my captcha and make a forum post.
Huh, my captcha seems to agree with me, it's 'axe to grind'
As a french Irishmen living in the uk are you on crack seriously they have chavs also uk has many elements ever looked at the picts or the celts the normans. I think what you describing is some some Americanized pre conceived non sense you got in your head.irrelevant83 said:As an American, I do like British culture, especially comedy, but I can't get over their obsession with making everything cute.
I'm not even sure if cute is the right word, it's just the best word I can muster. They don't just apply cute names to things like the Japanese do, but apply cuteness and expect everyone to take it seriously. I can't get into Harry Potter, though I'm sure it's brilliantly written, just because non-magic users are referred to as Muggles. To compare, the Final Fantasy series has creatures called Moogles, but FF doesn't force us to take them seriously.
Again, it might just be the fact that I'm American. I'm used to mystical things sounding sort of Asian or Middle Eastern and putting apostrophes in random places. An ancient secret society should be called Kal'sur and the mystical weapon should be Dor'salim. So if non-magic using people in the HP universe were called Cara'sin instead of Muggles, maybe I wouldn't be posting this on the net, but as it is, Muggles is a word that forces me to accept the fact that I'm reading a book written for an 8 year old even though the later novels grow with the audience.
As it is, I hate British naming of Fantasy things. Posters should feel free to add their own grievances.
I was with you until 'italian food.' Italy has great food!Vie said:Yes I despise British cuteness.irrelevant83 said:Original Post
But to be fair I also despise American Modesty, German sloppy workmanship, French military prowess, Italian food, Japan's bizarre hatred of tentacles, Swiss partisanship, Vatican Cities atheism, Australia's high quality of acting talent, Norwegian hatred of fish and the Netherlands repressive drugs laws.
and there lies your issue ITS A KIDS BOOK nothing else to say really. If you called them as-gal-dee-ens then kids would have issues reading the word, furthermore their not going to change the word half way through the series.irrelevant83 said:Muggles is a word that forces me to accept the fact that I'm reading a book written for an 8 year
Psst... you're not meant to tell them that before they get here, how am I meant to mug him for all his worldly possessions if you scare him off like that.TimeLord said:Britain? Cute? You obviously haven't been to Glasgow on a dark Saturday night.
Hell I'm an American as well and I vastly prefer the word Muggle over the stupidly pretentious Cara'sin. The fact that most fantasy authors need to invent words is one of the major problems with modern fantasy to me, it worked for Tolkien cause he didn't just throw some random syllables together he crafted entire languages. I'm not an author but I have successfully ran a few D&D campaigns that lasted for multiple years, want to know what what I called the Faery like creatures that inhabited the woodlands of my homebrew setting? FAERIES, when in doubt with creating any type of setting go for simplicity.irrelevant83 said:Again, it might just be the fact that I'm American. I'm used to mystical things sounding sort of Asian or Middle Eastern and putting apostrophes in random places. An ancient secret society should be called Kal'sur and the mystical weapon should be Dor'salim. So if non-magic using people in the HP universe were called Cara'sin instead of Muggles, maybe I wouldn't be posting this on the net, but as it is, Muggles is a word that forces me to accept the fact that I'm reading a book written for an 8 year old even though the later novels grow with the audience.
You do realise that Harry Potter was aimed at kids, right? It's not stereotypically British for us to make things "cute", just an unfortunate name in a story about a pre-teen kid at the stage where you encounter "muggles" for the first time.irrelevant83 said:I can't get into Harry Potter, though I'm sure it's brilliantly written, just because non-magic users are referred to as Muggles. To compare, the Final Fantasy series has creatures called Moogles, but FF doesn't force us to take them seriously.
Definitely not the Irish.Daystar Clarion said:Second?Agent Larkin said:The British don't make things cute. They just happen to be the second most sarcastic people in the world.
Who, pray tell, is the first?
Because it looks like you're in a bad tv show trying to fend off hackersSirBryghtside said:I generally don't care about pretentiousness - it just looks cool.
I mean, Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl fhtan?
How is that not awesome?