Yeah, I'm with this 100%. As an Australian (ie. a citizen of a country that I believe is probably considered one of the happiest in the world) who's lived in the UK for some time, this 'British cuteness' thing has me stumped. The British don't really do cute. If we want to talk about humour, theirs is cynical, dark, often quite clever, and brilliant. I've lived in both England and Japan, and I would be hard-pressed to find a country as cutesy or as obsessed with cuteness as Japan, and Britain is certainly not going to take the coveted cuteness trophy from Japan or any other country any time soon.SillyBear said:Mate, I've got no idea what you are talking about.
Most things that come out of Britain are tremendously dull and seedy and dark as far as art and entertainment goes. The British are one of the most cynical people in the world.
Also, as a humongous Harry Potter fan... there are some seriously un-cute things that happen, certainly in the later books. I will say that the way she names things is, compared to the Celtic and Asian names for mystical creatures, cutesy, but I wouldn't say that Americans (or any other English-speaking nations) are above naming stuff similarly. Cuteness is obviously subjective, and any relative cuteness we may see in these names is probably to do with the naming drawing inspiration from English, the language we are all familiar with, while not many of us are familiar with Celtic and Asian languages so those names sound mystical. Some of those Celtic names might literally mean "Bubbles and gummi bears", for all we know. Believe me, after learning a foreign language, names in that language stop sounding terribly exotic.
And cutesy though the naming in Harry Potter is, it's also clever, and full of relevant references.
Or by Twilight. And I think even people who don't like Harry Potter would say that Britain would win, there.Quellist said:Soo, Harry Potter is the litmus paper for British Culture? I guess by those rules we should judge America by The Wizards of Waverly place?