Yeah that is Mr Gates's personal net worth. Good lord that guys has it made heh.Baresark said:snip
LoL... Just LoL. You just learn to read, because you're doing it wrong. That article says 300 ex employees threaten suicide over missing compensation, not over bad work conditions. Also, if you follow your own link you find an article that says Microsoft had it's own investigation and found the suicide threat was not over work conditions but employee compensation. I reiterate my point, I'm not saying these things are not a problem, but until a formal investigation is mounted by a third party we have no way of separating sensationalism from truth. Newspapers love to jump on controversial subjects, ad nauseum.Kalezian said:Baresark said:snip
allegations?
ahem, click this link.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/tag/foxconn
and then see this image:
oh, yea, threatening a mass suicide because of bad working conditions is an "allegation"......
I read a fascinating book that outlined his utter luck that landed him in that position. I could use some of that, haha.Harper0341 said:March 1st 2011 (Couldn't find anything newer)
Apple Net Worth: $302.47 billion
Microsoft Net Worth: $224.01 billion
Google Net Worth: $190 billion
When you can sell mediocre products at a beyond premium price, of course you will have more money lying around.
Props to Apple marketing.
Yeah that is Mr Gates's personal net worth. Good lord that guys has it made heh.Baresark said:snip
Anyway on topic, this kind of crap has been going on for years, and Apple is definitely not the only guilty party in this. The only reason this is getting ANY attention over here is because the mass suicide threat managed to get on the news here.
I got the sarcasm, just seemed a good place to inundate the detailsZachary Amaranth said:I was joking. I agree with you.The_root_of_all_evil said:And why they're asking someone else to do it now. After they've finished constructing their iPads.
And hey, the quote was from my birthday!
...Weird connection, I know.
At the moment you're either voluntarily ignoring facts or trolling.Baresark said:Right. No one is debating the ethics of it. So, what's your point.
Let's change that. 99% of Apple customers might, but 10%(?) wanted to pay more for an ethical one.jetriot said:If Apple offered two Iphones that were the exact same but one was $100 dollars more and was made by better treated workers which would you buy? 99% of all consumers would buy the one that was 100$ cheaper.
Actually, Apple could easily manufacture in western countries without making their products more expensive, if they cut back on some bonus payments/hording money, as their products have ridiculous profit margins.jetriot said:For those yelling at Apple(of which I own no products of) I ask you this. If Apple offered two Iphones that were the exact same but one was $100 dollars more and was made by better treated workers which would you buy? 99% of all consumers would buy the one that was 100$ cheaper. Obviously. If this was not the case than manufacturing would not have moved to China in the first place.
I agree on Apples profit margin, but you can only blame brainwashed customers willing to pay anything for the shiny. Apple products are unique in that they really were a luxury item, like a Prada bag, until very recently when everyone decided they have to own one as well.bakan said:Actually, Apple could easily manufacture in western countries without making their products more expensive, if they cut back on some bonus payments/hording money, as their products have ridiculous profit margins.jetriot said:For those yelling at Apple(of which I own no products of) I ask you this. If Apple offered two Iphones that were the exact same but one was $100 dollars more and was made by better treated workers which would you buy? 99% of all consumers would buy the one that was 100$ cheaper. Obviously. If this was not the case than manufacturing would not have moved to China in the first place.
The drive for more profit every year is what created the current situation in several manufacturing areas.
You could also ask the western workers, then those in eastern Europe, and now the workers in Asia...jetriot said:[...]bakan said:snip
However, I don't see how these Chinese workers we are suddenly advocating for again will be better off if their jobs moved over seas.
Simply put. That is untrue. I love you regard me as "snarky" when in fact you are looking at only text. It's very amusing.The_root_of_all_evil said:snip
Here's a clue:Baresark said:What you are regarding as proof is un-investigated claims.
I think "inhumane and abusive" works in any world value. Especially when it's provided by a their own countries university. The 83 page report detailing all of these abuses.As always, my biggest concern is putting first world values to second or third world nation.
So Slavery is something we must put up with instead of Death. You don't think that's a mild exaggeration? If that's your point, then we should be applauding Apple for bringing Slavery back to American Business. I mean, the Thirteenth Amendment doesn't apply to other countries, does it?But my simple point is that threatening the company may not result in better jobs for people, it may result in no jobs for people, followed by starvation and personal desolation.