Seriously, Princewilliam? What the heck kinda name is that?
I wish there was a higher admission price to parenthood than a one night stand.
Few things...Grey Carter said:Naming a child is difficult. On one hand, you don't want to give them something too weird. They might appreciate it when they're older, but growing up with an easily-mocked handle isn't fun - take that from someone who went through secondary school with a middle name that rhymes with "gay." On the other hand, you don't want to give them anything too boring, like Dave or Andy. If you're going to do that, you may as well go the hog and christen them "Mediocre Smith." One thing you probably shouldn't do, however, is name them after your preferred brand of personal computer.
Should not, but just try and stop 'em. It's what we do best and anyone can do it! For free!!!... [small]up until the actual birth.[/small]Legion said:I don't care how stuck up or elitist it makes me sound. Some people should not have children.
Chlorine? More like extra strength bleach.Daystar Clarion said:Agreed.Legion said:It still baffles me why we need to take tests for so many things, but don't need basic competency tests to bring a new life into the world and prove we are capable of not screwing it up.
That's not just related to this, but there's been a lot of stories of idiotic parents recently. Like one here in the UK where the mother pretended her ten year old had terminal cancer to trick people into giving her money.
I don't care how stuck up or elitist it makes me sound. Some people should not have children.
Reminds me of the couple who named their child 'hash tag' because they love twitter so much...
Even the gene pool needs a little chlorine every now and then.
That's a little bit of a jump don't ya think? How about instead of abortion we can put the child in foster care for a few years until the parents can pass the "make-up test" or something?Foolproof said:Because thaqt would require we regulate people doing the thing that comes before it. It would also require that, if a person failed the test, the fetus be aborted. There's a gigantic number of people in America fighting about doing that to a woman willingly, you really want to throw doing it against her will into this?Legion said:It still baffles me why we need to take tests for so many things, but don't need basic competency tests to bring a new life into the world and prove we are capable of not screwing it up.
Well, if makes you feel better, a spectacularly stupid Jewish couple had their children taken away from them after they called the police because Dairy Queen refused to write their six-year-old son's name on a cake.DVS BSTrD said:Well look on the bright side: in 18 years there will be no shortage of hookers and strippers.Grey Carter said:The name "Apple," while still relatively rare, rose 15 percent for girls, climbing up 585 spots in the space of a year.
Naming your child should be the competency test. Something like Adolph Hitler would result in permanent suspension of parenting licenseLegion said:I don't care how stuck up or elitist it makes me sound. Some people should not have children.
Give it time, you'll see the pony named kids pop up. If it hasn't already.Ukomba said:Clearly this is the fault of Apple Jack, Apple Bloom, and Big Macintosh.
It's always 'happened already' it seems. [http://runa-the-seamstress.deviantart.com/art/My-Little-Baby-where-I-ve-been-299043643]Tiger Sora said:Give it time, you'll see the pony named kids pop up. If it hasn't already.
I don't know if it's so much an obsession because of their inherent respect for the royal family, they see them more as a really posh zoo attraction that are fun to watch.NinjaDeathSlap said:Princewilliam... seriously?!
For a country that fought a war against British Colonial rule at its inception, America's obsession with the British Royal family borders on the unhealthy at times. Hell, if we ever decided to abolish the monarchy, the USA would probably adopt them!