...Well the PS3 is an update and that does not transfer over to individuals sold to whereas you don't buy angry birds twice (unless your retarded). The PS3 sold 55 million units while the PS2 sold 3 times that kinda arguing that its impact diminished (Xbox 360 sold 57 million) so overall consoles lost players. Therefore the scope is wider and increasing casual games, pioneered by angry birds as opposed to the short lived reign of the consoles (with my PC gaming trodding along at a happy 100 million+).Tin Man said:Bad comparison.Comando96 said:The playstation may well have re-invented the wheel but thats no good if they can't sell the so miraculous reinvention as it doesn't reach others.Michael Flick said:I'm pretty sure that the playstation reinvented the wheel, not steve jobs and angry birds.
Angry birds sold half a billion. 1/14 people on the fucking planet could own angry birds.
The ps1 and the ps2 also sold about a quarter of a billion between them, and they aren't 70p pieces of toilet time sink designed to be picked up and forgotten about minutes later. They're the consoles which spawned the current generation of gaming as we know it.
Shit, I would argue that the Game Boy has more of a right to be on any list of influential gaming devices then any current gen console, let alone the iPhone...
Yes they are...Michael Flick said:So selling alot of budget titles is more important to gaming then nintendo that brought consoles into the homes
Well sadly the legacy of said device saw a 33% fall in total console users when they both upgraded to the next generation. That sort of reign is known as the Alexander the Great Reign. If you think the term Alexander the Great reign is good then you don't understand your history.Michael Flick said:and then the playstation that made gaming cool that turned an entire age group into "gamers"
If your going to play that card then we may as well dedicate the biggest impact to the creation of games to Tommy Flowers.Michael Flick said:and the microsoft that made a operating system that 99% of all games are made and developed on?
Times are a changing and... people hate Microsoft, think Nintendo is a gimmick, Sony... psn... that pretty much leaves apple as the last company in any good standing.Michael Flick said:Sorry but thats bullshit, it seems that everyone has gotten the steve job virus that makes people believe hes jesus christ since he died, sorry but I don't drink that koolaid.
...too...much...stupid...Michael Flick said:as for Tommy Flowers that's even more of a joke then Steve Jobs, Do you still compare a 17th century musket to a ICBM? because that's the comparison you just made.
Truth be told since the PS1 there haven't been many great leaps and bounds from the makers of consoles. Most innovation has been on a part with the Developers for those consoles (derp) to which Microsoft and Sony can claim a pathetic amount of credit. The numbers of gamers on the consoles actually declined upon the upgrade to the next generations... not what I call bringing the industry forward, but the combination of mobile phones getting better and better as well as being cheaper and cheaperMichael Flick said:And as for the rest of comment, I can tell you aren't going to listen to reason, because you just shat on all three companies, even though you haven't as of yet proved why Apple and Steve jobs are so important to gaming, while I have.
I sure as hell do.Mike Kayatta said:No one is denying that Steve Jobs was important to the tech community.
The writer for this article made me laugh. He called Sega a "dying studio".L10nH3ArT said:Well the article forgets to add in the fact that the survey was given at a convention that mostly focuses on handheld technology such as android, iproducts and the like.
Add in that fact and it kinda makes this a no brainer.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/benzingainsights/2011/11/02/steve-jobs-voted-most-influential-man-in-video-games-igniting-a-firestorm-of-complaints/
You (and it looks like everyone else on this thread) forgot the actual graphics [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apple_II_games]. Yes, it was preceded by a couple of dedicated video game consoles like the Magnavox, but it was an important device in the early days of home computer gaming.Doom972 said:Until recent years, apple products (Macs) had very little to do with gaming.
Gaming became big back in the Atari days , not when Apple released the iPhone.
In the devices I would expect to see the Atari 2600, IBM PC, NES and Playstation 2. These made a real difference.
In the list of people I'm surprised that there's no mention of John Carmack. Steve Jobs definitely has nothing to do with games, even if there are many games for the iDevices.
These industry professionals seem to have fish-like memory. If you don't know the history of the gaming industry you aren't an industry professional.
The Apple II definitely wasn't massive enough to deserve to be listed as an influential gaming platform. It had a huge impact on home computing but not so much on gaming as other platforms.Falseprophet said:You (and it looks like everyone else on this thread) forgot the actual graphics [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apple_II_games]. Yes, it was preceded by a couple of dedicated video game consoles like the Magnavox, but it was an important device in the early days of home computer gaming.Doom972 said:Until recent years, apple products (Macs) had very little to do with gaming.
Gaming became big back in the Atari days , not when Apple released the iPhone.
In the devices I would expect to see the Atari 2600, IBM PC, NES and Playstation 2. These made a real difference.
In the list of people I'm surprised that there's no mention of John Carmack. Steve Jobs definitely has nothing to do with games, even if there are many games for the iDevices.
These industry professionals seem to have fish-like memory. If you don't know the history of the gaming industry you aren't an industry professional.
Perhaps neither the Apple II nor the iPhone/iPad on their own would earn Jobs a place at the top of this list. But maybe having a huge impact on the industry in both its infancy and its more recent iterations resonated with industry insiders with a sense of perspective.