But you wouldn't be able to type with your thumbs... Also watching a whole film on this would be a pain unless you have a stand, and even then you can't take the stand everywere you go.
As you just said tablets can already do this and without having to pay the 'apple tax', so pray tell why would a company pay more to do something it can already do with existing products on the market for a lot less?Gitsnik said:I hate that the next few lines I utter are going to sound like fanboy-ism.TheYellowCellPhone said:What is the use for that... Sure, it has more battery life, more memory, faster processor, etc., but it doesn't have an iPod or iPhone trait that many love... you can put it in your pocket. It's a big waste of money, it's just if you pumped steroids into an iPhone... it's better and faster but too big.
But you realise that people don't use CURRENT tablet machines to put in their pocket right?
Assuming this suits hardware requirements, it's going to be perfect for what tablets are currently perfect for: SCADA monitoring, doctors checking patient records, walking around a warehouse checking connotes, that sort of thing.
Too bad the Tablet PCs that already exist are more versatile and have better specs that justify their price tag unlike this thing which doesn't even have Netbook specs. Hell it doesn't even have a keyboard except for that dinky little one that you have to, altogether now, buy from AppleGitsnik said:I hate that the next few lines I utter are going to sound like fanboy-ism.TheYellowCellPhone said:What is the use for that... Sure, it has more battery life, more memory, faster processor, etc., but it doesn't have an iPod or iPhone trait that many love... you can put it in your pocket. It's a big waste of money, it's just if you pumped steroids into an iPhone... it's better and faster but too big.
But you realise that people don't use CURRENT tablet machines to put in their pocket right?
Assuming this suits hardware requirements, it's going to be perfect for what tablets are currently perfect for: SCADA monitoring, doctors checking patient records, walking around a warehouse checking connotes, that sort of thing. Apple may be marketing it a little off ball (since when have they not), but when you make a tablet machine... YOU USE IT AS A TABLET.
Basically everything you uttered indicates that your first question was accurate: You've got no sysadmin experience, or anything more than school and perhaps stuck-in-an-office experience. Perhaps.
I'd love to see one of these in the boardroom, so I don't have to leave a laptop in there for the staff to deal with - they can just bring up their calender and notepad on this thing. It's cleaner, more efficient, and it looks prettier than the bigass XPS that's in there at the moment.
I hate how fanboy-ish that sounded, but I've made the same argument about other tablet PC's before, and probably will again.
Right, I'm quoting you but this goes for the other guy who quoted me as well.AceDiamond said:Too bad the Tablet PCs that already exist are more versatile and have better specs that justify their price tag unlike this thing which doesn't even have Netbook specs. Hell it doesn't even have a keyboard except for that dinky little one that you have to, altogether now, buy from AppleGitsnik said:I hate that the next few lines I utter are going to sound like fanboy-ism.TheYellowCellPhone said:What is the use for that... Sure, it has more battery life, more memory, faster processor, etc., but it doesn't have an iPod or iPhone trait that many love... you can put it in your pocket. It's a big waste of money, it's just if you pumped steroids into an iPhone... it's better and faster but too big.
But you realise that people don't use CURRENT tablet machines to put in their pocket right?
Assuming this suits hardware requirements, it's going to be perfect for what tablets are currently perfect for: SCADA monitoring, doctors checking patient records, walking around a warehouse checking connotes, that sort of thing. Apple may be marketing it a little off ball (since when have they not), but when you make a tablet machine... YOU USE IT AS A TABLET.
Basically everything you uttered indicates that your first question was accurate: You've got no sysadmin experience, or anything more than school and perhaps stuck-in-an-office experience. Perhaps.
I'd love to see one of these in the boardroom, so I don't have to leave a laptop in there for the staff to deal with - they can just bring up their calender and notepad on this thing. It's cleaner, more efficient, and it looks prettier than the bigass XPS that's in there at the moment.
I hate how fanboy-ish that sounded, but I've made the same argument about other tablet PC's before, and probably will again.
And the problem is that nobody is going to use this thing as a tablet, at least not the early adopters who are the airheaded yuppies that didn't get the message that this thing is supposed to be a tablet machine. They didn't get that message because Apple is treating it as an iPhone. Hell it looks like an iPhone. It might as well be an iPhone. But it is not an iPhone and that is where Apple has, once again, screwed up. Maybe I can see the business applications for it, but the thing is Apple isn't aiming for business on this one, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that way about their strategy.
Oh bravo sir, nice one!Greg Tito said:which is poised to turn other electronic readers into Kindling.