The fact of the matter is that I'm not sexually attracted to men. But despite that I can identify what I have determined to be attractive traits in males, logically those attractions would carry over into, if not directly influence, the change in sexual orientation.zehydra said:Not that difficult, to answer your question.
Let me look back at your first post a sec.
"I'm completely straight, I can safely admit that if I were attracted to men, that would be my type in the looks department."
since you've already stated that your attraction for him is on a non-sexual level, then why would he be "your type" if you were gay?
It's so incredibly simple, yet you're making sexuality out to be some great quandary. Perhaps it's because I view sexuality to be such an open prospect rather than divided strictly between homo and heterosexual. Let me put it like this:
You make it out as if the only way for a man to identify handome features and attractiveness in another man is for him to be gay.zehydra said:Except you have no possible way of knowing what you'd find attractive in a man, if you were attracted to men (other than by looking at what other gays find attractive, or something).
With that said, let's just agree to disagree because this is going to go nowhere. We have different views on the openness of sexuality and the capabilities and limits to which a straight individual can spot attractive members of the same sex. Different societies and upbringings are bound to bring up these disputes, so let's just leave it at that.