Quantum physics. The 'religion' of today's world.Playbahnosh said:I believe more in quantum physics, than in some incomprehensible deity, who, for some utterly ridiculous reason, has first century human properties.
I said I believe more, I'm not all for it. I do know, that quantum physics is just a fancy word for "Physics stuff we no barely anything about, but we like to theorize". But since the Bible is ancient astrology coated with philosophy all jumbled into short stories, and quantum physics is at least somewhat based on modern science, I like the latter more. Maybe two millennia later people will see quantum physics as we see the Bible now, that's why civilization is emergent. We question things, that's how we move forward. Quantum physics is basically the questioning of everything.Mardrax said:Quantum physics. The 'religion' of today's world.Playbahnosh said:I believe more in quantum physics, than in some incomprehensible deity, who, for some utterly ridiculous reason, has first century human properties.
You do realise that field is funded on evidence about as solid as the Bible, right?
It's a ***** of a field. Interesting, mind boggling, and fun, but a real ***** of a field. Still, if you ever want to be in it, you might succeed where the rest have failed - you never know. If you do, I'll get to say that I was there at your beginningPlaybahnosh said:Based on what you said in your previous posts, I guess she has a point.
Ooops! Damn typos. I has them ^_^ Edited, thanks!Gitsnik said:It's a ***** of a field. Interesting, mind boggling, and fun, but a real ***** of a field. Still, if you ever want to be in it, you might succeed where the rest have failed - you never know. If you do, I'll get to say that I was there at your beginningPlaybahnosh said:Based on what you said in your previous posts, I guess she has a point.
Your last paragraph (post 65) should be edited. You like the latter more.
yes, Have any of you ever heard of the three robot laws? they were invented years before proper robots actually came about, but becuase of these robots will never take over.mikecoulter said:No, robots are still unable to program themselves, so as long as they're coded to a)not harm humans and b)not cause damage to certain objects. We'll be fineUnless of course they find a logical reason to manipulate their code, in which case, they would have the perfect AI. They could change their actions depending what seems like the most logical choice, which could include defending itself. Lets wait and see
![]()
We discussed that already. Asimov himself refined his "3 laws" further (adding a number of them as stated) after he created the original three.Ashbax said:yes, Have any of you ever heard of the three robot laws? they were invented years before proper robots actually came about, but becuase of these robots will never take over.mikecoulter said:No, robots are still unable to program themselves, so as long as they're coded to a)not harm humans and b)not cause damage to certain objects. We'll be fineUnless of course they find a logical reason to manipulate their code, in which case, they would have the perfect AI. They could change their actions depending what seems like the most logical choice, which could include defending itself. Lets wait and see
![]()
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3 A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Sure they were invented by a writer, but scientists are using them on the more advanced robots. *shrugs* its like I, robot. Oh wait, all the robots in that started killing everyone. Woops.