well... some of the ZP videos have more than 1000 comments, when other stuff like de-red barely gets like 30poleboy post=18.73035.781585 said:I think you and SA are mistaking this for the Yahtzee fanclub. I couldn't care less.
So? Then we have the forums all to ourselves.Archaeology Hat post=18.73035.781656 said:You wouldn't notice. Alot of people would. I don't think the escapist would be as big as it is sans Yahtzee.
Bah, those are second-rate shots. Zack Parsons [http://www.somethingawful.com/d/awful-links/awful-link-3468.php] totally kicked his ass in 2005. He could have at least called us pretentious or something.Clairaudient post=18.73035.781594 said:I wasn't intending this to be a call to arms to defend Yahtzee. He does take some shots at The Escapist that I felt were unjustified however.
Damn straight, yo.snowplow post=18.73035.781867 said:Ha, the site is named "Something Awful" so it must be something awful!!! Witness how the wit oozes and cleverness drips from that post. Behold the deeper cleverness by being aware of the lack of wit in your post so you purposely post it so the mindless masses will notice and assume. Mere puppets in you hands!Anton P. Nym post=18.73035.781720 said:I decline to provide them revenue by reading the article; "Something Awful" is an excellent, self-descriptive title.
-- Steve
Indeed, but you need to level up before bowing before me and worshiping my divinity. My pre-req is Grovelling 11+.Well that was fun. Its not everyday I get to bask in the grace of forum gods. rofl
Websites breed?SimuLord post=18.73035.782148 said:The Escapist probably isn't about to release its numbers for readership and whatnot over time just in response to a not-very-good satire on world-renowned Internet circle jerk Something Awful, but it doesn't take Adam Smith to see the economics of the Yahtzee hire.
The entire point of spending money in any business is the hope that the money you spend will yield more money later, and the cause-and-effect at work here, "Escapist spends money to hire Yahtzee, brings in new fans, gets more advertising revenue" isn't some sort of civic benevolence on Ben Croshaw's part (unless they gave him an ownership stake). But acknowledging the commercial aspects of the Internet is SO squaresville (beyond "lol internets SRS BUSINESS lmao"), and heaven forbid Something Awful or 4chan or GameFAQs or any of the other incestuous, insular communities online acknowledge that.
I'm glad someone else gets it.Susan Arendt post=18.73035.781689 said:Um..I think folks may be missing the tongue-in-cheek nature I see clearly running rampant through that article. The author seems to be poking fun at the denizens of SA's overwhelming desire to hate everything and anything. I'm not taking sentences like "You can't really find any valid reason to hate this guy no matter how hard you try. At least if he were female we could accuse her of being an attention whore or something." too seriously...are you?
The article's main thrust -- that people love to hate Yahtzee simply because others love him -- is entirely valid. As for his claim that no-one had ever heard of The Escapist before Yahtzee showed up...well, that's obviously untrue, but it's a pretty common perception.
I thought it was actually pretty amusing, overall.
Websites breed. With their sisters. Oh sure, they call it "inspiration", but it's really just like 80's-retro fanfics involving Kirk and Candace Cameron. And their babies.Archaeology Hat post=18.73035.782303 said:Websites breed?SimuLord post=18.73035.782148 said:The Escapist probably isn't about to release its numbers for readership and whatnot over time just in response to a not-very-good satire on world-renowned Internet circle jerk Something Awful, but it doesn't take Adam Smith to see the economics of the Yahtzee hire.
The entire point of spending money in any business is the hope that the money you spend will yield more money later, and the cause-and-effect at work here, "Escapist spends money to hire Yahtzee, brings in new fans, gets more advertising revenue" isn't some sort of civic benevolence on Ben Croshaw's part (unless they gave him an ownership stake). But acknowledging the commercial aspects of the Internet is SO squaresville (beyond "lol internets SRS BUSINESS lmao"), and heaven forbid Something Awful or 4chan or GameFAQs or any of the other incestuous, insular communities online acknowledge that.
Someone has to do it.poleboy post=18.73035.781703 said:It's sort of a mixture I think. The SA people do seem to realize that what they're doing may not always be terribly intelligent or clever. But if I know anything about them, they love to troll and piss people off, and that's just childish in my opinion.Susan Arendt post=18.73035.781689 said:Um..I think folks may be missing the tongue-in-cheek nature I see clearly running rampant through that article. The author seems to be poking fun at the denizens of SA's overwhelming desire to hate everything and anything. I'm not taking sentences like "You can't really find any valid reason to hate this guy no matter how hard you try. At least if he were female we could accuse her of being an attention whore or something." too seriously...are you?
The article's main thrust -- that people love to hate Yahtzee simply because others love him -- is entirely valid. As for his claim that no-one had ever heard of The Escapist before Yahtzee showed up...well, that's obviously untrue, but it's a pretty common perception.
I thought it was actually pretty amusing, overall.