Ironic Pirate said:
Chicago Ted said:
But I still don't understand what is so wrong with that. Quite a number of threads are merely author soapboxes, at least I started this one to maybe help educate some people. If I wanted to make a manifesto about why squirtle is an under-rated pokemon, that'd be perfectly fine (unless it somehow counts as a versus thread). There isn't much discussion value, yes. So? Out of the dozens of threads on the first page, there's one you don't like, which you can tell from the title. How does that bother you?
One more thing. This thread isn't called "I'm a voraphile, let's talk about my every-day life" you'll notice. That's irrelevant, because this thread is about a way that I'm different. I have a weird fetish, so I make a thread about that. An astronaut would make a thread about his job. If I made a thread saying "I have a weird fetish, let's talk about my job" that'd be just as bad as an astronaut saying "I have a cool job, let's talk about my underwear preferences.
Well, you kinda answered all of my problems.
I don't like threads that are there to stand in as a soapbox for the author because there isn't much discussion value in them. If it serves as a personal spot for you to stand and drone about a topic, while others are only really there to crowd around and ask, I don't care to read for it. This one simply served as a slight breaking point for me on that matter. I see this style of thread too frequently, with too little to define them, so for once, I actually said that I didn't appreciate the style of them and actually don't see the value of them. It's funny, because only a few days ago, someone was in a similiar situation, where they were the only ones really speaking out against the style in which things were presented. The OP ragged them out (far harsher than you I might add, the OP really did sound like an ass during it, and not simply responding to what had been said). I then quoted the guy, and said that I had agreed with him, and that the style things had been presented in was misleading. Ten minutes later, I recieve a PM and friend request from him saying he thought he was the only one who had felt that way.
As for your final paragraph there, you're kinda missing my point. I am saying that while you appreciate vore, there is little distinction between that and other interests. Boiled down, the thread pretty much comes to a personal preference on a rather niche subject. If it was something more in tune with, "I'm in the military, ask any questions you have about it here", that at least dives into something that I can not experience or get answers to questions as easily. If I wanted to find out about vore though, I could simply type it up on Google, and find a wide variety of examples and distinctions far easier.
TrilbyWill said:
Chicago Ted said:
think of it this way buddy: if nobody actually explained this shit, we might just silently judge those people. asking someone about a career might help them decide, but for things like fetishes it helps us understand.
OT: so how does the roleplay aspect work?
So, summary, bothers me simply because I don't like the style to begin with. Isn't the content that's annoying, but the manner in which it is presented. Offers little discussion, and in my mind, only a bit of solid information that isn't made from a personal view point on it. And on the note of judging them, normally, if something like this is presented to me and it's not my thing, my reaction is to simply shrug my shoulders, think it's odd to myself, but realize other people like it. Same opinion I have with those that are furries, or those that buy sports games every year, since I don't believe there isn't a whole lot to understand in the first place.
Now it's time for me to eat my chicken dinner... Mhm... BBQ...