Grenbyron said:
3 Nice Lawsuits involving Walmart and its honest business practices...
http://twincities.bizjournals.com/twincities/stories/2008/12/08/daily14.html
http://www.thesunchronicle.com/articles/2008/12/24/news/4144199.txt
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2007/Feb/07/bz/FP702070363.html
All preventable if a Union was present. As for the moving in and shucking a town, that is unfortunately legal. No law specifically restricting it. A town I know that is suffering it is Port Angeles, Washington. I am done, but don't let the smiley fool ya people.
Wal-Mart tried the whole union thing in Canada, and it didn't work. Labor unions are a business, they are there to make money. They really don't do squat in taking care of their employees, I've had experience with both union and non-union labor, and the unionized labor is a load of shit.
Years ago where I worked once the employees were not unionized. Once the union came in the overall wages of new employees went down, most workers were forced into being part time and never doing over 36 hours a week (seriously it was always just around 36 hours a week). The only thing labor unions try to do is make sure companies follow local labor laws. The only difference in your 3 cases had there been a labor union is the union would brand its logo on the lawsuit and end up making a ton of cash if the union wins.