They seem to be on the right idea, I'm only half way through number 2 and I am more bored with it than anyone has ever been bored in the history of boredom.
Assassin's Creed Needs a Break, Says Producer
- Thread starter Logan Westbrook
- Start date
I'm glad to hear this. It's good to see developers realize that even die-hard fans can get sick of a game if you overload them with it...see Guitar hero.
Why the hell didn't they just ignore Brotherhood and finish the trilogy instead then? Idiotic...
Well, with said expansion they can continue the story a bit more while adding in content....
With the trilogy ended this would've been hypocrisy at it's finest along with them not being able to continue the story as DESMOND...
Speaking of which, yes that's how they should end it. As he has acquired the knowledge and skills to be the best assassin.
Like a Matrix plot device he's learned through the use of computers. I wonder if they pulled the pluf if he'd wind up dead or in a permanent trance thinking he's in 1586 as Enzio.
With the trilogy ended this would've been hypocrisy at it's finest along with them not being able to continue the story as DESMOND...
Speaking of which, yes that's how they should end it. As he has acquired the knowledge and skills to be the best assassin.
Like a Matrix plot device he's learned through the use of computers. I wonder if they pulled the pluf if he'd wind up dead or in a permanent trance thinking he's in 1586 as Enzio.
Here's to hoping that Assassin's Creed III to be even better than both II and Brotherhood. If they release it on 2013, it'll give them more development time. And please, no leaving out episodes (like ACII).
Try playing the NEw final fantasy. That'll have you praising the ground AC2 walks on. Personally, I didn't get bored of the game until I'd played for about 30 hours of just mucking around killing all the guards, after I'd finished the story in 21 hours. Then I started a new game with the language on italian, and it was fun again. (man, I wish you could replay memories. It would make sense, since the animus is DESIGNED to replay memories.)FinalDream said:
Anyway, I'm not sure what the thrid game in the main trilogy will be, but I hope the extra year gives it the time it needs to get its stuff together.
I think that that's sort of the point. If the developers don't give us the game next year, we'll be anticipating it even more the year after that (and on and on for the next few years until the IP finally dries up).ZeroAE said:
I, personally, think that this is a pretty good idea. Franchise milking is what brings us incoherent messes like Modern Warfare 2, so having AC3 come out after plenty of time in the incubator should be a good thing for gamers. Now all that we need is for the publisher to agree...
My brain hurts.Sephiwind said:
OT: I'm happy to wait for AC3, but I really hope that they can justify why we're playing as Ezio again in Brotherhood. I mean I like Ezio but the end of ACII
kind of screwed him over to the point where he no longer needs to exist at all. I mean if he was only there so that the Gods could talk to Desmond through him, why does Desmond need to go back into the Animus to see him "hopefully" kill the Pope, in Brotherhood.
I think it would probably be a mistake to wait until 2013. A lot of the conspiracy theory-driven interest will die down after Dec 21 of 2012. The game itself makes many references to that date, so...
I'm glad he has this philosophy, though, because I was a little bummed when I heard about Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood. I don't understand why it's necessary, and it kind of flies in the face of the spirit of the series. I'm not saying I can't be convinced to try it, but it's definitely not marked on my calendar.
I'm glad he has this philosophy, though, because I was a little bummed when I heard about Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood. I don't understand why it's necessary, and it kind of flies in the face of the spirit of the series. I'm not saying I can't be convinced to try it, but it's definitely not marked on my calendar.