What? SPOILERS, dude!elvor0 said:
<.<
No, but that's pretty bad. On the other hand, that's what I expect from hair in games.
Assassin's Creed: Rogue Revealed in Leaked Trailer - Update 2
- Thread starter roseofbattle
- Start date
<.<
No, but that's pretty bad. On the other hand, that's what I expect from hair in games.
It's kinda awkward seeing as the previous gen game looks a lot more interesting than the next gen version. Also, why no PC port?
So now Ubisoft are straight-up double dipping in the annual releases business? I mean I guess they were already doing that sort of but that was ONE console game and ONE Handheld game, that's a fair enough distinction for me, but TWO console games being released within weeks of each other? come on, atleast put a month or two between them for people to properly budget.
Who the hell keeps leaking these Assassin's Creed game trailers and info?! They must be stopped, I tell you! Heads will roll.... Call dailymotion. We're taking this sucker down. Yeah, block youtube, shut down all avenues for leaking our valuable intellectual property that is misrepresenting the company and hurting our business strategy. Whew, that was close....
*Hour or two later*
Okay, now release the trailer, plot, release date, protagonists name, and setting.
*Hour or two later*
Okay, now release the trailer, plot, release date, protagonists name, and setting.
So this year we're getting Assassin's Creed Red and Blue Versions. I think I'll take red because Charizard is my favorite.
Ubisoft has a thing for the 18th Century. First AC III, then Liberation, then Black Flag, and Unity. I was wondering about what "Comet" meant.
Color me interested. The game straight up has you playing a Templar, and not hide it like it did with Haytham Kenway (odd are good he'll appear)? Cool. This appears to be set during the Colonial Assassin Purge, which Achilles Davenport and his homestead barely survived.
Color me interested. The game straight up has you playing a Templar, and not hide it like it did with Haytham Kenway (odd are good he'll appear)? Cool. This appears to be set during the Colonial Assassin Purge, which Achilles Davenport and his homestead barely survived.
So you're playing as a traitor in this one? Hm...I don't really care for people who are willing to turn their back on their entire beliefs and then go and kill their former friends. It's why I don't like Anakin too.
Are they going to try and make the Templars into the good guys now? Not that there's ever been a good side/bad side, but still...it seems like they're trying very hard to make the Templars into nice people now and they have the right idea. And seeing as there are barely any Assassins left, I guess that's what we'll end up doing.
Are they going to try and make the Templars into the good guys now? Not that there's ever been a good side/bad side, but still...it seems like they're trying very hard to make the Templars into nice people now and they have the right idea. And seeing as there are barely any Assassins left, I guess that's what we'll end up doing.
I have liberation, and Child of light, and BG&E,(yay for my support doing any good!) but in light of the recent "No, you can't pay as women in AC Unity, but HEY! Here's a prominent woman... Look! You're RESCUING HER!" BS, and Farcry 4's lack of playable women, and so forth, It's "What have you done for me recently" or "what have you done in your latest releases."Witty Name Here said:Done. Ubisoft is back alive again.Rebel_Raven said:
So, since Ubisoft has, quite literally, more female lead characters than any major publisher in the video game market, when do you intend to start buying more ubisoft games? After all you said that until they release a game with a female protagonist they're dead to you... and they've been doing that for quite a while. So now it looks like you wont need to hold onto that vow.
So far, it's just the lil' war game that they've done recently.
The Tomb Raider sequel ain't out yet, and it's Square Enix, and not Ubisoft, IIRC.
Beyond Good and Evil's been out. Liberation is a port from Vita.
They're sure as heck aren't in any apparent rush to give is BG&E2.
Ubisoft's done quite a bit of damage recently over doing playable women any good.
Also Tecmo-Koei, Platinum, and Square, IMO, are currently beating Ubisoft's butt in as far as playable women in games with less bullshit.
I supported them before the ACU/FC4 crap. It's really hard to keep up that support since they're at a point where they don't give a shit about keeping women playable.Witty Name Here said:
Lots of Japanese/Asian people in games. I'm half Korean, and I guess I notice that for some reason. Yakuza, pretty much everyone from a Koei game, and so forth.
Just recently Yakuza let you play a a female character, though the game isn't out stateside.
In Ubisoft games, they just hadn't been to asian regions until FC4, but there's women in every region, doing things to impact things. They had women in multiplayer, even, but they just cut them out in 2 of their major games despite "planning" on having them.
The 2013 Tomb Raider is out, yes, but there's a guardian of light sequel, and a sequel to the reboot coming out, and near as I can tell, the Ubisoft logo isn't on them. Neither are out yet. I have both Guardian of Light, and the reboot. And Underworld, and more.
I'm sorry, but when ubisoft went back to not wanting to have women as playable, and cutting them from the game first, I'm done with them. That's what they've done recently. "It's too hard to make games with women, so we're not, even though we planned on it. I guess plans change!! Women get cut!" In -2- games, back to back. How many other games went that way but they were just quiet about it? Until I see signs of this letting up, screw'em. They're not getting my money.
Ubisoft's not going to get a pass because they did it before, and stopped.
I'm... remotely interested.
I remember in the first Assassin's Creed feeling like they had done a FAR better job fleshing out the Templars than the Assassins. The antagonists in that game all had comprehensible and sometimes even sympathetic reasons for why they were doing the things they did. They felt like people who believed in their cause and could often present worthwhile arguments for their side of the conflict, where as the Assassins often struggled to do so.
By the second game, they were just bad people you needed to stick a knife in cause they were bad. Every one of them was either a blank slate or a generic mustache twirler. They butchered the philosophical underpinnings of free will vs authority which, if not exactly high-tier stuff, at least helped make the first game more interesting. It made the conflict feel so morally one-sided that the only thing that saved the game for me was Ezio being an enjoyable character in and of himself.
That put me off enough that I hadn't really played any of the rest, but I'm curious if they can actually turn things around and make the traditional antagonists once again feel like they might actually have some ground to stand on. On the other hand, it might end up going full "BE THE BAD GUY!" and then I'd really lose interest.
I remember in the first Assassin's Creed feeling like they had done a FAR better job fleshing out the Templars than the Assassins. The antagonists in that game all had comprehensible and sometimes even sympathetic reasons for why they were doing the things they did. They felt like people who believed in their cause and could often present worthwhile arguments for their side of the conflict, where as the Assassins often struggled to do so.
By the second game, they were just bad people you needed to stick a knife in cause they were bad. Every one of them was either a blank slate or a generic mustache twirler. They butchered the philosophical underpinnings of free will vs authority which, if not exactly high-tier stuff, at least helped make the first game more interesting. It made the conflict feel so morally one-sided that the only thing that saved the game for me was Ezio being an enjoyable character in and of himself.
That put me off enough that I hadn't really played any of the rest, but I'm curious if they can actually turn things around and make the traditional antagonists once again feel like they might actually have some ground to stand on. On the other hand, it might end up going full "BE THE BAD GUY!" and then I'd really lose interest.