Because actual good faith debate demands people do that?Why do you people give them the time of day?
Meet this comment"He didn't directly say it, but I KNOW that's what he meant!" is very weak reasoning and doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.
No Houseman. The warlord doesn't need to say specifics. Dwarvenhobble showed you exactly the implications of Trump's message. The warlord doesn't need to order anything.To quote an African Warlord once interviewed in regards to claims of brutal crackdowns against opposition groups.
Reporter: "So when you're giving a speech what would happen if some opposition members started shouting to express their views"
Warlord: "Oh they are entirely free to express their views for the duration of my speech"
Reporter: "So you'd not punish them nor would they face repercussion?"
Warlord: "I would do nothing to them, my men however, they are very loyal and what they might do once I have walked away I cannot say"
No. That’s fucking nonsense. It’s like saying you’re at your most honest when you’re prank calling strangers, it’s a bunch of solipsistic liberal bullshit. The you that interacts with others as human beings is more you than the you trapped in your own brain.So online conversation is often more honest then.
Cool.I hope for your sake that's true.
Good for you. I don’t care what Nick tells me to do. I’ve made that very clear. I use this site for my own enjoyment and if I have to act differently to stay on it I won’t be having that fun. It’d be insane for me to adjust my behavior at the behest of an authority I don’t care about.No I keep pointing out it happened and we literally have a message up from Nick telling people to knock that crap off.
I don’t care what others here are saying people are or are not doing. Houseman is what he is. I don’t stick my head up my own ass to help other somebody else’s argument.So you're equating Torchman with the most extreme elements of one side while other people argue no-one is doing that?
You really are undermining their argument you know that right?
Laughs.Why do you people give them the time of day?
So you'll be able to point to the part of the speech Trump called for direct action then?
To quote an African Warlord once interviewed in regards to claims of brutal crackdowns against opposition groups.
Reporter: "So when you're giving a speech what would happen if some opposition members started shouting to express their views"
Warlord: "Oh they are entirely free to express their views for the duration of my speech"
Reporter: "So you'd not punish them nor would they face repercussion?"
Warlord: "I would do nothing to them, my men however, they are very loyal and what they might do once I have walked away I cannot say"
Neither did the warlord. Trump did say he was going to go with them to Congress thoughExcept Trump didn't give free reign to his supporters or imply he was looking the other way for a while.
If that's your position why bother?No. That’s fucking nonsense. It’s like saying you’re at your most honest when you’re prank calling strangers, it’s a bunch of solipsistic liberal bullshit. The you that interacts with others as human beings is more you than the you trapped in your own brain.
If that's the case then I dunno just go round posing Goatsee or Tubgirl to people. If you don't care about much but annoying or owning people or trying to annoy them?Good for you. I don’t care what Nick tells me to do. I’ve made that very clear. I use this site for my own enjoyment and if I have to act differently to stay on it I won’t be having that fun. It’d be insane for me to adjust my behavior at the behest of an authority I don’t care about.
Well maybe if you tried to look at other positions and not assume the worst of people you might find you actually want to be here to try to talk to people.I don’t care what others here are saying people are or are not doing. Houseman is what he is. I don’t stick my head up my own ass to help other somebody else’s argument.
Except he does by pointing out his men doing it while he's not there.Neither did the warlord. Trump did say he was going to go with them to Congress though
Are you threatening to kill me and my entire family?No Houseman. The warlord doesn't need to say specifics. Dwarvenhobble showed you exactly the implications of Trump's message. The warlord doesn't need to order anything.
Unless, of course, you think this warlord was completely innocent and did nothing wrong
Carry on, but I think the joke's peaked.Laughs.
I didn't claim anything, I copy and pasted from your quote.Which is not what you claimed I said.
Except initially what you post said was quoting me seeming sayingI didn't claim anything, I copy and pasted from your quote.
Which is no I didn't saycentrist Joe Biden being far left.
No he doesn't. He just say he doesnt knowExcept he does by pointing out his men doing it while he's not there.
Cool to see that you agree that the warlord didnt intend to hurt people who disagree with himAre you threatening to kill me and my entire family?
No of course you didn't say so specifically, but that's the hidden subtext of your message.
See, there's a difference between legitimately reading subtext and straight-up lying about there being a hidden subtext.
Trump EXPLICITLY said he wanted a peaceful demonstration at the capitol.
For you to read into that as saying "oh, so by peaceful, he meant violent!" is straight-up lying.
which implies he also doesn't care to find out.No he doesn't. He just say he doesnt know
That's not an argument. So you concede the point?Cool to see that you agree that the warlord didnt intend to hurt people who disagree with him
No. He said he did know what his supporters would do.which implies he also doesn't care to find it.
Also he specifically said he's not looking at that moment / not there.