No, because evolution has bugger all to do with atheism or theism.Straitjacketeering said:Isn't the Atheist bible a science book on evolution?
No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
Bologna. Morality comes about rationally due to the success of populations that practice it over ones that don't. There are purely pragmatic bases for the golden rule; namely, you don't have to waste a lot of energy defending yourself from people if you treat them with a modicum of decency.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
That's crap. Social groupings further the survival of the individual in terms of protection, resource gathering, entertainment, healthcare etc. If you do to those others as you would have them do to you you instantly increase your chances of survival and indeed of success. This is a very simple way of putting the origins of natural law, but it alone invalidates your position.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
That can't be it because Atheism is a religion.bikeninja said:I thought the thing atheists hated most was "organized religion"
which makes me wonder why they team up and organize meetings or rallies, or stuff like this.
and the topic: "atheist Bible" just screams oxymoron.
I suppose...if you're trying to define morality from a religious point of view...but doesn't it only boil down to because God/Ahriman/Odin/Buddha said, not because there's any more inherent logic behind it than having morality with no-reason at all.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
No one ever asks where God gets HIS morality.GothmogII said:I suppose...if you're trying to define morality from a religious point of view...but doesn't it only boil down to because God/Ahriman/Odin/Buddha said, not because there's any more inherent logic behind it than having morality with no-reason at all.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
caross73 said:Bologna. Morality comes about rationally due to the success of populations that practice it over ones that don't. There are purely pragmatic bases for the golden rule; namely, you don't have to waste a lot of energy defending yourself from people if you treat them with a modicum of decency.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
Wrong. Provably so.starrman said:That's crap. Social groupings further the survival of the individual in terms of protection, resource gathering, entertainment, healthcare etc. If you do to those others as you would have them do to you you instantly increase your chances of survival and indeed of success. This is a very simple way of putting the origins of natural law, but it alone invalidates your position.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
Hehe, that's true...funny thing, I think they'd say God is just God...that he doesn't work for us, we work for him. In god's own words as said by a great sage thousands of years later: I yam what I yam an' that's all that I yam. And if we don't like it? Tough, he's god he can do whatever the hell he likes, with only his own apparently innate moral compass to guide him.caross73 said:No one ever asks where God gets HIS morality.GothmogII said:I suppose...if you're trying to define morality from a religious point of view...but doesn't it only boil down to because God/Ahriman/Odin/Buddha said, not because there's any more inherent logic behind it than having morality with no-reason at all.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
There IS no logical thing to do. Your spouse refuses to give you a dollar because she doesn't have one. WHAT DO YOU DO???"Wrong. Provably so.
You find out your spouse is infertile and will not be able to have children with you. What is the moral thing to do, and what is the logical thing to do?"
What happens to societies that take care of their infirm? What happens to societies that do not? Do you want to live someplace knowing that if anything happens to you, you will be sacrificed?A blind person is born who will inevitably soak up more from society than he will ever realistically ever be able to put back in. What is the moral thing to do, and what is the logical thing to do?
I'll answer this when I get home tonight, but suffice to say I disagree.cuddly_tomato said:caross73 said:Bologna. Morality comes about rationally due to the success of populations that practice it over ones that don't. There are purely pragmatic bases for the golden rule; namely, you don't have to waste a lot of energy defending yourself from people if you treat them with a modicum of decency.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."Wrong. Provably so.starrman said:That's crap. Social groupings further the survival of the individual in terms of protection, resource gathering, entertainment, healthcare etc. If you do to those others as you would have them do to you you instantly increase your chances of survival and indeed of success. This is a very simple way of putting the origins of natural law, but it alone invalidates your position.cuddly_tomato said:No. But belief systems and faith are the only source of morality. There is no logic or scientific basis for morality, ethics, justice etc.kawligia said:God is not the only source of morality.
Do a search for "natural law" or "natural rights."
You find out your spouse is infertile and will not be able to have children with you. What is the moral thing to do, and what is the logical thing to do?
A blind person is born who will inevitably soak up more from society than he will ever realistically ever be able to put back in. What is the moral thing to do, and what is the logical thing to do?
A man is arrested for murdering his wife, but he is a genius chemist who will be able to advance anti-viral drugs if allowed to remain free. What is the moral thing to do, and what is the logical thing to do?
Morality is extremely subjective and is different from person to person. Science and logic are not, they can be clearly defined and categorized. The two have nothing to do with each other.