After a long Hiatus, some soul searching, and what not I return to see... this crap still going on but far worse! I just hope I can stick to my promise not to become an argumentative, political driven arsehole I was all the while back then. I do have a few things to say on this topic...
Why the hell can't my home country just get a 18+ rating and be done with it? Oh yeah, it would then have NO EXCUSE to pull this, gags at the term, draconian bullshit! That is the sole reason the government is fighting to prevent a 18+ rating. Is it really a surprise when the people who are calling the shots are all 'blame it on the violence in games' morons who honestly believe they can make the world a shiny happy place if they got rid of computer games! These people are looking for excuses to get rid of more then just R18+ games but any game with 'questionable content,' which normally means fun to me.
In any case this group will NEVER relinquish the one loop hole they can use to ban any game: the unrated so defacto-banned loophole.
Now on the matter of loopholes we can remember these people saying they wanted to close one... of course it was the one that gave them more power over the internet! They are doing it already and will expand easily so we have to ask the question: How do you classify an online games?
A) Do you rate just the games engine on it's own merits without any other user interaction. For example, running the game in a closed network without anyone else connected.
B) Do you rate the user interaction as well? Logging onto a bunch of random online servers and rating a games based on how the other users behave.
Bonus Issue) Do you further rate the engine on it's ability to be openly modified by user content? Which... is about every damn online game out there and allows ANY content to be added to a game.
With how these people have acted which one do you think will be?
B and Yes on the bonus material I bet!
They will argue a game needs to be rated on it's fullest interactions and on all possible ways for a 'child' to be exposed to filth. I know it, and you know it, they will use that very excuse so they can use the interactions of a online community to negatively rate a otherwise ratable game. I know your thinking that is a bit nutty there but have these game nazi' given you a single reason to trust their judgment, to trust that they are doing 'what is best for us?'
The real nut case question I ask to myself is: Has Australia Capitulated to China while no one was looking? It clearly shows that the mentality that is ruling China is what we have in Canberra these days....