I thought I pretty much stated that earlier. Maybe my language wasn't strong enough. I was discussing law and Aboriginality the other night with my friend, who is a barrister, and we both came to a conclusion that you could argue that the government has mostly skirted around the issue. Applying 'quick fixes' where it suits votes, for example. When you analyze the language used in the 2008 apology, its rhetoric feels like it is directed at the non-Aborginal people of Australia because Rudd's language simply wasn't very strong and definitive in describing the harm done to Aboriginal people.RhombusHatesYou said:It's about undoing a cultural genocide, and that's something that takes time and money to do.
Australians are so politically disengaged that they haven't really a clue about the genocide that is still essentially taking place at a systemic level.