Australia's Internet Filter Switches On In July

MikeOfThunder

New member
Jul 11, 2009
436
0
0
SomethingAmazing said:
Hiphophippo said:
Boy I bet it's lonely in your little world.
What gave you that impression?

I just wouldn't say anything bad about any of the governments. They have the military and all. So, as a result, I support anything they go for.

And we might as well get rid of piracy and pornography while we're at it. :p
Thats insanity! First, the government (at least in a liberal democracy) are suppost to serve the people and yes, I know people will ***** that they don't but infact they do, or atleast when enough people are angry they do. Just blindly accepting the governments choices because 'their in charge' is incredibly foolish and can lead to loss of (trying not to sound over dramatic) your freedom.

Piracy, I can't specifically argue against you there.

Pornography, really? If you are referring to illegal porn, then yes I agree that it would be a good thing to be rid of, however regular (hell! even irregular) porn is fine. I see no problem in it.

At first I was annoyed by the censorship thing, but reading into it, is getting rid of child porn a bad thing? No, and i think most of you will struggle to argue otherwise. Saying that though I do appreciate that the interent is free, completely and utterly. Limiting even an inch of it could spark a massive censorship campaign on anything! Which is wrong. In this entire debate, I don't quite know where I stand. i am strongly against illegal porn (I actually find it difficult to type) but at the same time, I am FOR the freedom of the internet. After all, where will it end?
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
SomethingAmazing said:
Hiphophippo said:
Boy I bet it's lonely in your little world.
What gave you that impression?

I just wouldn't say anything bad about any of the governments. They have the military and all. So, as a result, I support anything they go for.

And we might as well get rid of piracy and pornography while we're at it. :p
I love pirates and porn though.

Not necessarily together.

Though maybe when I'm feeling eclectic.
 

GeekFury

New member
Aug 20, 2009
347
0
0
I can support the part about blocking websites relating to child abuse/molestations, hell more internet providers SHOULD block those types of sites but beyond that I don't think they should block other sites, if a consenting adult wants to watch adult filmsonline between two other conseting adults no one should stop him, and if a kid watches it, ban their parents from the internet till they can watch their spawn.
 

Rabish Bini

New member
Jun 11, 2011
489
0
0
Tdc2182 said:
SomethingAmazing said:
Hiphophippo said:
Boy I bet it's lonely in your little world.
What gave you that impression?

I just wouldn't say anything bad about any of the governments. They have the military and all. So, as a result, I support anything they go for.

And we might as well get rid of piracy and pornography while we're at it. :p
I love pirates and porn though.

Not necessarily together.

Though maybe when I'm feeling eclectic.
I'm assuming you've seen the 'Pirates' porno yes?

Just so long as this doesn't get out of hand, eg. porn sites start getting blocked and the like, I won't really care
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
Rabish Bini said:
I'm assuming you've seen the 'Pirates' porno yes?

Just so long as this doesn't get out of hand, eg. porn sites start getting blocked and the like, I won't really care
I actually have not, but I do think I know which one you're talking about. I remember seeing something about a porn that used the most CGI in a porno flick ever.

My interest was peaked.
 

Sud0_x

New member
Dec 16, 2009
169
0
0
Awexsome said:
I can't disagree with this since it's censorship is quite reasonable at this time. Unless anyone here wanted to go look at child abuse sites.

It's important to keep an eye out so that they don't go too far but this isn't too far. At all. With how lawless of internet has been getting out of control recently it really does need some regulation in small steps so that they don't drop the hammer all at once in an overreaction.
Reasonable? Please. This is the country that called a Dead or Alive game "Child Pornography" weeks ago, I read it in a national newspaper, almost spat my coffee all over the lunch room. Australia's attitude toward media and their ridiculous fearmongering when it comes to this sort of thing is anything but reasonable. Call it sensationalism but there's no denying that our own government is pushing a conservative agenda, the sad thing is they're doing it because they think that's what the people want. Also, we won't get into the subject of illegal immigration but, the way asylum seekers and the Islamic are represented in our media is so dangerously close to being outright racist propaganda that it makes me sick (although this is definitely not confined to Australia).

Like others have said, my concern is this:
Once this sort of thing becomes acceptable; what's to stop the government from following through with their agenda and censoring whatever the fuck they feel like? Come on, it's Australia, don't think they wouldn't.
EDIT: Sorry, that's "censoring whatever the fuck they feel like... more than they already do".

Though, I do understand what you meant, I'm not for a second suggesting you would be okay with any such practices. I have been really concerned about just this sort of thing happening and I've said before I'd jump ship if it came down to it.

By the way, no, no I wasn't planning on looking at child abuse sites.
 

BringBackBuck

New member
Apr 1, 2009
491
0
0
Grrr Not sure what to with this. One of the ISP's doing this is the one that I use. In fact my only choice of high speed internet is between Telstra and Optus who are both doing this shit.
I really disagree with this and last year was prepared to become an Australian citizen just so I could get the right to vote, just so I could vote against the stupid government that proposed this completely ineffective and reactionary bullshit. Now that my ISP has decided to do it, I'm not sure what to do. Cancelling my account and telling them to fuck off will hurt me more than them, and I don't see any point in using a proxy, because I don't want to access any child porn sites so it won't actually affect me. Write an angry letter? I mean really I am just going to take this even though I really disagree with this on principle.
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
Awexsome said:
I can't disagree with this since it's censorship is quite reasonable at this time. Unless anyone here wanted to go look at child abuse sites.
Merkavar said:
so its just stopping child porn? thats good so it wont affect me and like everyone else in the country.
Hi there! Let me enlighten you with the earlier Australian blacklist, as uncovered by Wikileaks! Here's an article about it: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/19/1237054961100.html

Allow me to quote the best part: But about half of the sites on the list are not related to child porn and include a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist.

I love the smell of government censorship in the morning!
 

Arakasi

New member
Jun 14, 2011
1,252
0
0
Ekonk said:
I love the smell of government censorship in the morning!
-Snnnnniifff-
Smells like the government got over hating boat people.
Next target!
 

imperialwar

New member
Jun 17, 2008
371
0
0
there just needs to be a group of creepy old guys going around protesting with signs: " They took my porno away, now i'm coming for your kids."
Should be a good laugh.
Seriously we have enough problems with getting normal games so we can live without the kiddy porn stuff, thanks.
 

Merkavar

New member
Aug 21, 2010
2,429
0
0
Ekonk said:
Awexsome said:
I can't disagree with this since it's censorship is quite reasonable at this time. Unless anyone here wanted to go look at child abuse sites.
Merkavar said:
so its just stopping child porn? thats good so it wont affect me and like everyone else in the country.
Hi there! Let me enlighten you with the earlier Australian blacklist, as uncovered by Wikileaks! Here's an article about it: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/19/1237054961100.html

Allow me to quote the best part: But about half of the sites on the list are not related to child porn and include a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist.

I love the smell of government censorship in the morning!
obviously thats all bad and wrong but if they just block child porn then thats all good with me.

i would think the blocked sites should be on a registry that anyone can view. i did hear that some dentists website was block and he didn even know. i wonder who or how sites are added to the list to be blocked.
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
Merkavar said:
Ekonk said:
Awexsome said:
I can't disagree with this since it's censorship is quite reasonable at this time. Unless anyone here wanted to go look at child abuse sites.
Merkavar said:
so its just stopping child porn? thats good so it wont affect me and like everyone else in the country.
Hi there! Let me enlighten you with the earlier Australian blacklist, as uncovered by Wikileaks! Here's an article about it: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/19/1237054961100.html

Allow me to quote the best part: But about half of the sites on the list are not related to child porn and include a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist.

I love the smell of government censorship in the morning!
obviously thats all bad and wrong but if they just block child porn then thats all good with me.

i would think the blocked sites should be on a registry that anyone can view. i did hear that some dentists website was block and he didn even know. i wonder who or how sites are added to the list to be blocked.
Personally I don't see what's so threatening to the unprepared mind of the sheeple about online poker sites, youtube links, gay or straight porn, wikipedia, euthanasia, christian sites, a tour operator and a dentist.

In short, government censorship is bad IN ALL CASES because it goes from noble intent (blocking child porn) to ridiculous totalitarianism (blocking porn and wikipedia).
 

Hristo Tzonkov

New member
Apr 5, 2010
422
0
0
In related news Australia has swam up and crashed with the middle east forever blending into the landmass.

Next Anon target for sure.Say what you will about hacker groups but you're gonna cry to them once your basic internet rights are breached.Unless you think censorship in a democratic country is fair game.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
SomethingAmazing said:
Hiphophippo said:
Boy I bet it's lonely in your little world.
What gave you that impression?

I just wouldn't say anything bad about any of the governments. They have the military and all. So, as a result, I support anything they go for.

And we might as well get rid of piracy and pornography while we're at it. :p
It looks like a troll, and it quacks like a troll, but he's standing by his statements...

Look, it seems you have the whole government thing backwards. In America anyway, the government's power comes from us. The people. It's right there in the preamble of the Constitution--go read it. No, here, I'll go get it for you.

Preamble of the US Constitution said:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
See? Cut out all the fluff, and what you have is "We the People do ordain and establish this Constitution." Not the government. Not the politicians. Not the President. Not the military. No, those guys only exist because we said they could be there. Lookie here, this comes direction from the declaration of independence (which was essentially written as a love letter to King George claiming our independence and why we felt it necessary to do so):

Declaration of Independence said:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,[74] that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
See the part I bolded there? We established our sovereignty as a country on this principle--the principle that if the government arranges itself so that it hinders Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, the people do and should have the right to disassemble said government and reestablish another. If we decided to act upon this and try and come up with something better, they would be acting against the very document that made us who we are today. And who would want that?

If you aren't from the US, then I'm afraid not all of this applies to you. I'm not as intimately familiar with the governments of other countries. If you are, then I'm afraid you are selling your self quite short as a citizen. You have a lot of power--in fact, according to the framers of the constitution, you have ALL the power. We have all the power. We the People. This government exists for us and by us, not the other way around. And if ever they make you question that, just familiarize yourself with the articles and amendments of the constitution, and specifically the ninth and tenth amendments:

Ninth Amendment said:
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Tenth Amendment said:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The first means that the rights given to the people in the constitution shall never be used to deny rights. In other words, they can't find some fancy way to interpret the first amendment that says they can, in fact, censor the press or prohibit protests in certain cases. No, the first amendment gives us that right, and so it belongs to us.

The second means that whatever powers are not given to anybody or are prohibited to the states or people, belong to the states or the people. In other words, all rights and powers not specifically given or prohibited by the constitution belong to us. This was made to prevent the government from extending its powers into unknown territory, and using it as a loophole saying "Well, the constitution doesn't say, so that means it's alright."

Know your rights. Get involved. In the US anyway, we have EVERY right to talk bad about the government. We put them there, so it's our own fault and responsibility to deal with things if we think they have gotten out of hand. To say "Well, they have the military, and I can't beat that" is just a lazy excuse for not taking the time to get to know how the government works and what you can do to change it. If you don't want to know about the constitution or politics or whatever just say so. But don't you dare run around and say that because you don't have a military you are just a helpless little sheep.

Oh, and also, to answer your other claim about "Getting rid of" piracy and pornography, no matter how much you censor the Internet it will always exist. They'll just be pushed harder and harder to find sneakier places to put it and more illicit means of communication.
 

Owlslayer

New member
Nov 26, 2009
1,954
0
0
Well, this is... weird. Sure, those sites they want to block are nasty and all, but who indeed checks if they decide to start blacklisting other sites, too?
Well, i really don't know a lot about how this should work, so don't quote me on that, might as well be wrong.
Still, don't like this...
 

TheRealCJ

New member
Mar 28, 2009
1,831
0
0
Merkavar said:
so its just stopping child porn? thats good so it wont affect me and like everyone else in the country.

wouldnt it be a better idea to not block the websites and just monitor who accesses the site?
I get the feeling that it won't just stop at child porn websites. And in Australia, the definition of "Child porn" is pretty damn broad: Just don't expect to see your favourite Imageboard available, because occasionally (heh, understatement) someone will post Loli hentai or something similar.
 

TheRealCJ

New member
Mar 28, 2009
1,831
0
0
RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:
SomethingAmazing said:
Thank goodness.

After a while I hope we can get this in the U.S. too so that we can phase out internet pornography and piracy.
Yes because pornography is inherently bad. I hope you just forgot to type in child or animal.
I hope you meant "bestiality", otherwise David Attenborough is going to have a slight problem on his hands.