Everything but the bolded part is fine. I mean, it's your opinion and all. I definitely agree that practical effects are better than special effects, all things being equal. An effect shouldn't exist for its own sake, or we're all just being entertained by the movie equivalent of a fake fireworks display. It'd be interesting to see a jungle-filmed Avatar, if only because it'd remind me of Predator.Hobonicus said:I'm not exaggerating when I say that I hate Avatar more than any other movie I've seen. Not because it's necessarily worse than any other film, but because of how overwhelmingly arrogant it is. It's just your usual flashy popcorn flick, no better than Transformers or Star Trek, but it's praised as such a revolutionary film from so many shallow perspectives.
I actually thought the acting was pretty good, and cinematography was probably above average. Unlike most, I hated the graphics. Granted I didn't see it in 3D (which shouldn't justify anything), but as a rule of thumb, if you know something is computer generated then they're doing it wrong, no matter how pretty it seems. This also ties in with how conceited the film is. Instead of filming in a jungle, or use makeup, they needlessly spend millions animating everything on a computer just because they've got money to burn. I even thought District 9 looked better graphically. In District 9, the Prawns looked real, but in Avatar everything is ridiculously smooth, and it's noticeable when the actors are shot next to a computer made being.
I could rant for days about how unoriginal, insulting, derivative, and boring this film is, but in the end it really boils down to it's arrogance. I usually try to let people have their say and ignore opinionated discussion, but Avatar is absolutely nothing special.
EDIT: before my argument becomes invalidated for sounding pretentious, I'd like to say that while I have seen a ton of movies, I have never taken a class on film theory, and my list of favorites is diverse while remaining mostly mainstream.
I dont believe I mentioned stunningly innovative. So dont shove words down my mouth.shotgunbadger said:Yea I'm real stuck up mentioning that this "STUNNINGLY INNOVATIVE MOVIE" is nothing special beyond a tech-demo.JS ibanez said:Yes we know its the same story as pocahontas or dances with wolves, stop being so pretentious. But so many films these days are the same film as something else or another. I guess hype is a bit of a curse then in that respect. Although James Cameron can always say "whats that? I cant hear you over my piles of money and highest grossing film ever"
Personally I enjoyed it because it looked cool. I enjoyed some good sci/fantasy action because thats what I expected from it. Nothing special story or drama wise, just fantastically good fun to watch
I work in a theatre in Vancouver and weve been showing Avatar since december and we still are showing it. It still sells out on weekends despite the fact that the entire world has seen it 5 times now. Its seriously looking like the first film thats going to be out on dvd and in the cinema simultaneously. I think I'll have to wait a while and forget about avatar for a while before I feel tempted to buy it on dvd
James Cameron makes a lot of money off a lot of shit movies, so yea I imagine by now he doesn't care so good point?
For god's sake, why not just get a pretty screensaver and stare at it if you want to turn your brain off and stare at 'duuur purdy graphix', why would you actively go pay someone to show you a 2 hour tech demo with racist undertones? I'm sure there's a very pretty gif of a cowboy raping a native that can do the same thing.
You're right, I did go overboard thereSamurai Goomba said:Everything but the bolded part is fine. I mean, it's your opinion and all. I definitely agree that practical effects are better than special effects, all things being equal. An effect shouldn't exist for its own sake, or we're all just being entertained by the movie equivalent of a fake fireworks display. It'd be interesting to see a jungle-filmed Avatar, if only because it'd remind me of Predator.Hobonicus said:I'm not exaggerating when I say that I hate Avatar more than any other movie I've seen. Not because it's necessarily worse than any other film, but because of how overwhelmingly arrogant it is. It's just your usual flashy popcorn flick, no better than Transformers or Star Trek, but it's praised as such a revolutionary film from so many shallow perspectives.
I actually thought the acting was pretty good, and cinematography was probably above average. Unlike most, I hated the graphics. Granted I didn't see it in 3D (which shouldn't justify anything), but as a rule of thumb, if you know something is computer generated then they're doing it wrong, no matter how pretty it seems. This also ties in with how conceited the film is. Instead of filming in a jungle, or use makeup, they needlessly spend millions animating everything on a computer just because they've got money to burn. I even thought District 9 looked better graphically. In District 9, the Prawns looked real, but in Avatar everything is ridiculously smooth, and it's noticeable when the actors are shot next to a computer made being.
I could rant for days about how unoriginal, insulting, derivative, and boring this film is, but in the end it really boils down to it's arrogance. I usually try to let people have their say and ignore opinionated discussion, but Avatar is absolutely nothing special.
EDIT: before my argument becomes invalidated for sounding pretentious, I'd like to say that while I have seen a ton of movies, I have never taken a class on film theory, and my list of favorites is diverse while remaining mostly mainstream.
Avatar is no way as bad as Transformers. Now that's just mean. Examine both side-by-side, scene-by-scene and you will probably find that Avatar is not only more competently written, filmed and framed, but it is just all-around more tolerable to sit and watch. I was ready for Transformers to be over at the half hour mark. It's just offensively bad. To me, there's a huge difference between the "nothing special" of Avatar and the putrescence of Transformers.
Exactly man. After watching it in VMAX (Adelaide's equivalent to IMAX, besides it's slightly downsized) there is no way I could replicate that in my house.crimson5pheonix said:No. I refuse to watch this on TV. The whole point of the movie was to look pretty, and I saw it on Imax. I've been spoiled, so I won't be getting it.
I dont think I could have put it that well if I tried. +1 thumbs up kudos props and all manner of other positive reactions to this post.Furburt said:Yeah, this is what I was trying to say. Avatar is a textbook definition of 'More than the sum of its parts'. Each element taken out of context, plot, characterizations for example, is pretty mediocre, but when it all came together on the screen, I was filled with a sense of wonder I haven't felt since I was a child.Proverbial Jon said:You cannot pick out one aspect of it and hack it appart, that's not fair.
I really think the Avatar debate is a debate between two separate ways of watching films, those that take each element and observe it on its own, the cinematography, the effects, the plot, are going to come away disappointed, certainly.
But, those who don't do that, those who take the film as an experience and rate it solely on how much it entertains them (like me), are going to come away loving it.
So in conclusion, neither side's right or wrong, Avatar just is a film that shows it up well, the divide between the two watching styles.
So please, stop flaming about it everyone. I've seen more heated debates about this then debates about things that actually matter, like Israel or the economy.
Ah, thank you for that information. Perhaps I can convince a buddy to go and take me with him, paying for everything.Furburt said:They're re-releasing it in July I think, it's going in cinemas in 3D with an extra 15-20 minutes of footage.Sassafrass said:May pick it up when it gets cheaper and I can find it.
Twas a good movie and I think it'll be worth watching again. Just wish I saw it in 3D. *Sad face*
Same here. I went in with a few friends because we were looking for something to watch, and I'd heard of it sure, but knew almost nothing about it or the hype. Couple hours later I came out with a big shit eating grin on my face, I was throughly entertained by the whole thing.Furburt said:Incidentally, I'd never heard of it when I first went to see it, the hype passed me by entirely. Maybe that's it, hype can make a certain type of person hate something before they even see it.
Anian wants to tell you why you didn't enjoy Avatar. You did? No, seriously, you didn't, you were just mirroring media opinions.anian said:Stuff.