That's a good one Icyneesan!icyneesan said:
I love when I get a chance to use this image. It's just so fitting.
>.> i can name a few better or more interesting then WoW, its not that there not there, people just don't know how to lookGalliam said:Especially since there aren't very many fun MMORPGs out there anyway, since WoW kills them all.
Like what for example? Very few MMORPGs have kept me playing but WoW is one that I still have an account and I will occasionally buy a 3 month card. Any others I've played, I quit and never went back.Kitsuna10060 said:>.> i can name a few better or more interesting then WoW, its not that there not there, people just don't know how to lookGalliam said:Especially since there aren't very many fun MMORPGs out there anyway, since WoW kills them all.
Not to mention completely ninja.Nick Stackware said:Paying money through envelopes under trees is completely legitimate.
And yet, it's the best offer I've seen for risking your job violating company policy. Based off things I have personally witnessed (to me or a coworker)....vansau said:I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that nobody at Blizzard would risk their job for a thousand bucks
You have to fly to the dig site, do a survey (pressone button) it points you in the direction you need to move, move a bit, do it again, until you get the fragments. When you have x amount of fragments (50+ usualy i think) you can solve and make an item, most probably junk.Thumper17 said:K, so, for those that don't play WoW, why is Archeology so boring?
You can't forget the old briefcase swap.Nick Stackware said:Paying money through envelopes under trees is completely legitimate.
To add to what Bobby said, the digsites are scattered all across the various continents, so there's a Fuckton of downtime. And the whole thing is RNG based, with the chances of getting the good stuff being really low.Thumper17 said:K, so, for those that don't play WoW, why is Archeology so boring?
Wow, a post in this thread that didn't make me rage. I'm getting sick of all the posts around here that are "hurp durp, broken rules. Durp durp." It's like no one actually considers the reason for the rules, or what breaking them actually signifies. I swear no one even thinks that a person in a position to make rules might not be infallible or have some ulterior motive like milking cash from people (I'm speaking quite generally here, not just about WoW and this situation).permacrete said:I join everyone else in mocking this poor dumb bastard, but I do have one little point to make:
Automating a boring and repetitive task isn't cheating. I'm sorry, but it just isn't. Is it breaking the rules? Oh yeah, but that's not the same as cheating. Archaeology is not competitive, you can't "win" it. Using a bot program doesn't (as far as I know) give you an advantage over someone who does the same thing manually, it just frees up your time for watching porn, or whatever else you do.
The biggest fail here is that this dude is so nuts over WoW that he is willing to pay a monthly fee for a game he doesn't actually want to play, and then is willing to pay another grand to keep doing that. The second biggest fail is Blizzard's, for making something in their game so painfully dull and boring that apparently a bunch of people feel the need to automate the process of doing it.
If a crapload of people bot archaeology, maybe Blizzard's first thought shouldn't be "Ban them!" Maybe their first thought should be "Fix archaeology so that it isn't boring as shit."