All the evidence I need is right there on the film. I admit I haven't read every single Superman comic since the late 30's, but no where in any origin story or developmental flashback I've seen does Jon Kent ever suggest that letting a bus full of kids die might have been a better option than saving them. The origin story in which he does is then, darker than any I've seen so far. I suppose if that isn't enough to qualify as darker... then fair enough. I suppose it could be worse, a world where the Kents make little Clark flog himself for not being human and one of God's creatures and therefore an abomination would be darker. Or perhaps one where Jon subtly erodes Clark's self confidence until he develops an inferiority complex and accidentally kills a kid breaking a tackle in a football game or something. But just because it could be a darker story, doesn't mean it isn't darker a story than other versions.IOwnTheSpire said:Do you have any ACTUAL evidence, or are you just going to keep making stuff up? Everything you've said isn't proof, it's you making assumptions about the filmmakers because they didn't read your mind and make the film you wanted them to make. You can't use your biased interpretation of the film (grimdark, my ass) as evidence to support how you think their mind works.
I get they wanted to change the story, it's a reboot and of course they wanted their version to stand out. Some of the changes worked. I liked the new look of Krypton. Less crystalline and more metallic, cool. It stands out from prior incarnations. Other changes, not so much. Take Zod's plan. I actually liked that rather than just being evil world domination super-badguy, Zod was portrayed more sympathetically. Trying to preserve his people and their way of life creating a new planet for them. What didn't work was not explaining why they couldn't have followed Kal, found Earth, and then just contacted him or Earth officials and said "hey, we notice you aren't using the next planet in your system. Do you guys mind if we use this big world engine to terraform it to be a suitable habitat for our endangered species?" That may not have turned out any better, but they could have at least asked or established why Mars wasn't good enough. Instead they had Zod go right for world domination as eugenesist space Hitler.
I'm not saying darker Superman stories CAN'T be good. I really ejoyed "Kingdom Come" for instance. But MoS was launching a DC cinematic universe. I'd just have preferred a more traditional "man of tomorrow, hope for humanity" foundation for Supes. That contrasts him better aginst someone like Batman who does have that darker background.