So it's ok for you to not be a big fan of XCOM buts it's not ok for others to not care about the XCOM series?What! You don't like Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle? Say It Ain't So!!!
Have fun being hypocritical as hell.
So it's ok for you to not be a big fan of XCOM buts it's not ok for others to not care about the XCOM series?What! You don't like Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle? Say It Ain't So!!!
I'm pointing out that you boasted about Mario + Rabbids metacritic score when it has the same gameplay of XCOM.So it's ok for you to not be a big fan of XCOM buts it's not ok for others to not care about the XCOM series?
Have fun being hypocritical as hell.
Ok...I'm pointing out that you boasted about Mario + Rabbids metacritic score when it has the same gameplay of XCOM.
I'm just pointing out you have a history of liking stuff (that's been around for awhile) when there's a fresh new "Nintendo" stamped on the box.Ok...
I haven't played Mario Party 6 or Mario Party 7 either. If i compare their metacritic scores with each other and i get interested in playing Mario Party 6 but have no interest in Playing Mario Party 7, does that mean that i hate Mario Party 2? which i have played and liked?
Mario Party 2 has pretty much the same type of game play as Mario Party 6 and 7 after all.
and i'm just pointing out that comparing metacritic scores doesn't mean jack shit about how much you personally like or dislike games.I'm just pointing out you have a history of liking stuff (that's been around for awhile) when there's a fresh new "Nintendo" stamped on the box.
I don't use metacritic, you do for some reason. I'm literally commenting on how you used metacritic scores to show Nintendo games are better than Sony games. I don't even know the last time I've even read any professional review of any game. Please show proof of me liking PlayStation games just because PlayStation is on it. I have numerous posts showing my dislike for Uncharted (outside of UC2 and Lost Legacy), God of War (outside of OG GOW1), Souls games (which Sony started). Hell, I even said it was a joke that something like Uncharted and Spiderman were nominated for GOTY.and i'm just pointing out that comparing metacritic scores doesn't mean jack shit about how much you personally like or dislike games.
and you have a history of only liking something when there's a fresh new "Sony Playstaion" label stamped on the box btw. hence why i laughed at you in the "Nintendo, Playstation or Xbox" thread
i didn't realise that Gears of War (which i like and even mentioned i've played up to Gears 3 in this thread) had a fucking "Nintendo" label stamped on the box. nothing was even mentioned about Nintendo until your biased ass brought them up to defend your precious XCOM
how typical that you'll resort to your stupid, same old, "Nintendo fanboy" comebacks to me and completely ignore what i said about Gears of War or anything else positive i've said about Non Nintendo related products.
Why?I don't use metacritic, you do for some reason. I'm literally commenting on how you used metacritic scores to show Nintendo games are better than Sony games.
He's accusing you of being hypocritical for claiming to not care about XCOM when you allegedly boasted about how good Mario + Rabids was when that game plays almost exactly the same (and not nearly as well, in my opinion).Why?
this thread isn't even about Nintendo or Sony Specific games. nor did i even bring up metacritic scores in this thread to start with. you did.
i know he is.He's accusing you of being hypocritical for claiming to not care about XCOM when you allegedly boasted about how good Mario + Rabids was when that game plays almost exactly the same (and not nearly as well, in my opinion).
Like, c'mon. It's not hard to parse this conversation.
This guy (or gal) gets it!He's accusing you of being hypocritical for claiming to not care about XCOM when you allegedly boasted about how good Mario + Rabids was when that game plays almost exactly the same (and not nearly as well, in my opinion).
Like, c'mon. It's not hard to parse this conversation.
I'm not mad at all, I couldn't care less. It's just so easy to google search "[insert Nintendo game] + yoshi178 + escapist" and get your posts boosting how great it is, how much it sold, how high its metacritic is, etc. It takes less than a minute. I doubt it's just a coincidence that you boosted about Mario + Rabbids but couldn't care less about XCOM as XCOM is lacking something on the box that you find overly important. Just like how Xenogears and Xenosaga weren't a thing and then Xenoblade is the greatest thing since sliced bread.i'm just pointing out that his bait to start an argument was irrelevant as hell to the actual thread at hand. i don't think i've even spoken about Mario vs Rabbids since 2018 at all. the fact that he's still mad that i apparently"boasted" about them that long ago is such a long and petty grudge of his to have
XCOM 2 is also coming to the Switch this yearThis guy (or gal) gets it!
I'm not mad at all, I couldn't care less. It's just so easy to google search "[insert Nintendo game] + yoshi178 + escapist" and get your posts boosting how great it is, how much it sold, how high its metacritic is, etc. It takes less than a minute. I doubt it's just a coincidence that you boosted about Mario + Rabbids but couldn't care less about XCOM as XCOM is lacking something on the box that you find overly important. Just like how Xenogears and Xenosaga weren't a thing and then Xenoblade is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I think the new breaching solves this issue. You station your team at entry points, bust in, and start combat so there's no putzing around the level anymore it seems. I hope that's the case for how all the encounters work. Mutant Year Zero implemented a stealth system that allows the player to engage when ready and after locating the enemies. Hopefully, that bad system has been rooted out of the genre.I do hope they also change the pod activation system, enemy should not get a free move when discovered, it just make flanking when riskier than it need to be and limit your option mid fight.
It is a bit strange to launch at 50% off and does kinda make me wonder about it, but I can think of some reasons they would do this. The most obvious reason for it is they are trying to undercut Gears Tactics, the games both launch a few days apart so they want to make sure they beat the more AAA game since the Xcom games have always had a bit of jank to them. It could be they are trying to be like "Hey, its quarantine times, have a new game cheap" but that doesn't really make sense because if they were they would want to advertise that fact. Lastly, it could be that they are changing enough about how the systems work they are worried about gamer revolt so they are making it really cheap, and considering how butthurt some of the dinks in the forums are being, that seems like a reasonable fear.I'm not a super big fan of xcom releasing at "half price", I don't think game should get discount for at least the first 3 month, otherwise its clear the price is just there so that they can put a big discount, I feel like it'll probably spend more time on discount than at the real price.
I think that swing too much in the other direction and remove the player decision. I like choosing where to fight the alien squad and making creative use of a level, but when I'm just following what the level creator obviously intended me to do, that takes away a lot of the magic of those moments and make the game too much of a puzzle.I think the new breaching solves this issue. You station your team at entry points, bust in, and start combat so there's no putzing around the level anymore it seems. I hope that's the case for how all the encounters work. Mutant Year Zero implemented a stealth system that allows the player to engage when ready and after locating the enemies. Hopefully, that bad system has been rooted out of the genre.
I knew this was coming the moment I saw the Snake in the background....and it's an XCOM sequel and you can't google VIPER without seeing Rule 34 everywhere. Remember, Those are" VENOM SACS"!Oh, that's too bad, it was a good game and my discs are broken.
I think this will answer your question.
Holy crap that clip was harder to find then it should have been.
Snake hostess clubs you say?Yep. Have fun sleeping tonight.
I knew this was coming the moment I saw the Snake in the background....and it's an XCOM sequel and you can't google VIPER without seeing Rule 34 everywhere. Remember, Those are" VENOM SACS"!
Which is why Snake Hostess clubs are now canon per the trailer. It pretty much confirms someone on the art team is a furry.
Snake hostess clubs you say?