I think you're operating on a different definition of "new". I, and many others, were going on the "never seen before" definition of new. Something they didn't do until the end, with the ported maps from BC1. But even that's stretching it. I'm not angry about the Vietnam expansion, since that brought in much more than just maps, and I'm not angry about recycling maps, but I'm just a little saddened that they decided "new" means "new to the gamemode" for all but two maps instead of "never before seen" new.Zefar said:Sorry but Oasis, Heavy Metal, Cold War, Harvest Day where all NEW maps that wasn't recycled with new game modes. Heavy Metal and Cold War was from the SP part but that's fine.Irridium said:The "new maps" they gave away in Bad Company 2 weren't new maps though. They were the same maps the game shipped with, they just put all gamemodes on them as time went on.
They most certainly did not give away new maps for free. Something they said they would do, but didn't. That's why people complained.
So we did get NEW and FREE maps.
For people who whines about it being on another game mode. Rush is pretty much the best thing in BF series yet except for Titan mode. Conquest is basically just Domination on larger scale which has gotten quite boring.
So when you strictly play Rush and get a new map on that game mode it's actually a good thing. Sometimes the new maps we got where better than the stock maps. Much better in fact.
I really hope DICE doesn't start to charge for map packs of any type because of these babies whining for petty things.
As for Battlefield 3, well they are charging for maps. Since the Karkand map pack is going to go for $15 and add much less than the Vietnam expansion. Which I think is sad but not surprising. After all, they're the best maps from BF2, of course they're going to charge for them. Because they know people will gladly pay $15 for them.