I agree with this. Once you can feel your opponent it becomes more easy to fight an assailant. Since you can get a general feel for how your opponent is standing and such.The Rogue Wolf said:Grappling would be the best, most likely. Once they're grappling with their opponent, they could use their sense of touch to know how their opponent is moving and counter.
There's a world of difference between having eyesight that's too bad to be able to properly follow and dodge a punch, and eyesight that's so bad that you literally can't see your opponent in front of you and can't tell where they're standing. All the grappling in the world isn't going to help you if you're too blind to even grab your opponent.the December King said:I was told grappling by a local MMA teacher. Since I'm basically blind without my glasses, he assured me that alot of grappling is tactile and provided I had a good grounding in a grappling art I could reasonably neutralize any sight based advantage, at least in part.
Of course, in an actual fight, it's almost impossibly debilitating.
If UFC is any indication, anything other than Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu will get your butt kicked.DarklordKyo said:Well, since Grappling-based ones is the generally held answer, any specifics other than Judo? For example, what about Aikijutsu, for example?
If UFC is any indication, if you are getting into fights with people like McGregor as a blind person, you probably deserve to get your butt kicked.DaCosta said:If UFC is any indication, anything other than Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu will get your butt kicked.
Judo is one of the better ones because of how focussed on grappling it is. Assuming you can get into range you are sorted. Not sure about Aikijutsu, but Aikido starts from receiving strikes / attacks, which obviously is an issue blind, and Ju Jitsu seems to have amounts of non-grappling to it (I think. Not 100% on Ju Jitsu).DarklordKyo said:Well, since Grappling-based ones is the generally held answer, any specifics other than Judo? For example, what about Aikijutsu, for example?
Yes... in a fight. I mean, what about something like wrestling, that starts with contact with the opponent... ritualized styles of combat training, maybe a blind person could negate that disadvantage. Also, the idea that taking the martial art as a means to better yourself, learn about the sport, and exercise, all that, as opposed to aggressively competing or attempting to dominate. Because yeah, blindness seems devastating in a real combat situation.Dirty Hipsters said:There's a world of difference between having eyesight that's too bad to be able to properly follow and dodge a punch, and eyesight that's so bad that you literally can't see your opponent in front of you and can't tell where they're standing. All the grappling in the world isn't going to help you if you're too blind to even grab your opponent.the December King said:I was told grappling by a local MMA teacher. Since I'm basically blind without my glasses, he assured me that alot of grappling is tactile and provided I had a good grounding in a grappling art I could reasonably neutralize any sight based advantage, at least in part.
Of course, in an actual fight, it's almost impossibly debilitating.
You could neutralize some of the opponents' sight based advantage once you're both on the ground since both of you have limited mobility at that point and no good way of dodging, but you have to get to that point first, and it's not like you can reasonably be expected to tackle your opponent to the ground when you can't even see where that person is.
Ableist!Dirty Hipsters said:Short answer: there aren't any, being blind sucks and leaves you super vulnerable.