Right, it's just that talking about the refugee experience has nothing to do with his story being a typical one. Plus, nothing you quoted actually does talk about being "poor besotten" etc etc-- it just says his father didn't want to live in a communist country.
How dare he!
Why, it's almost as if someone can decontextualize their own familial history, and evoke language with common imagery and connotations associated with it, in order to cast themselves in a false light. Thereby, allowing people to make incorrect assumptions about it.
It's not as if, say, Jeff Bezos is
lying about "founding Amazon from nothing in the garage of his house". He just happens to omit the part about him being a Princeton-educated software engineer who spent a decade on Wall Street, before founding Amazon with a over quarter-million dollars of investment capital from his upper-class parents. That still makes him a middle-class self-starting entrepreneur who is the embodiment of the American dream, doesn't it? Right?
And hey, amazing enough! Guess what Bezos' dad and Mayorkas' dad have in common?
Obviously I'm well aware of it; I mentioned the President as a path to getting it implemented before you did.
Yet you still brought up Congress when challenged on it.
I know this one! Joe Biden! Who also isn't the topic of this thread.
Oh yes, a thread about Joe Biden's cabinet picks isn't about...Joe Biden's cabinet picks. Or his policy, or capacity to influence or effect such. Or anything else involving Joe Biden, really.
Indeed. Corporate regulation not being a part of that problem that Mayorkas could feasibly have had anything to do with.
If we've now shifted to talking about visa reform, which actually is something he could've dealt with, then all's well.
Yes, how dare we suggest these are policy issues that are interconnected and interdependent upon one another to create an overall regulatory landscape in which labor is unethically exported from other impoverished countries (largely thanks to US geopolitical interference) and exploited domestically to suppress real wage growth. Are you now to say regulatory capture of executive administrations (like USCIS) does not and cannot happen?
How it works with me is quite simple to be honest: I welcome reforms to make the process more responsive and humanitarian, and I don't believe that those reforms should for some reason wait until everything else has been restructured first, because time matters.
And I want root causes resolved, to put an end to this cyclical full-on clown shit that's repeated itself for four decades running. Amnesty first
literally is the most responsive and humanitarian immediate policy decision that can be made, followed -- yes -- by regulating labor to stop further exploitation as quickly as possible.
Well, I was talking about taking Saddam out so they get more control of OPEC
Me too. The Persian Gulf war was based on an even bigger lie than the Iraq invasion -- Hussein had
casus belli against Kuwait, and the invasion was entirely justified.