My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die!
1) free, acute angle if we're using the three-option scale established in "earlobe morphology" (El Kollali et al., 2009)
2) complete non-rolling
I'd also like to point out that as someone who's studying genetics both of those examples aren't really practical Mendelian genetics since earlobes have a whole variety of attachments, which we know since at least the 40s I believe, and tongue rolling isn't even purely genetical since studies in the 50s and 70s proved that many monozygotic twin pairs can have a rolling and a non-rolling individual.
Both are not practical examples of Mendelian genetics but I guess they are more "fun" than the true ones like wet/dry earwax or the recessive ability to smell hydrogen cyanide.