BioWare Defends DLC Business Strategy

Hatchetman

New member
Mar 28, 2012
10
0
0
This just sounds like BioWare saying something controversial so people remember ME3 exists. Do they happen to have new DLC launching soon?
 

Karadalis

New member
Apr 26, 2011
1,065
0
0
Its official now... EA has ripped off biowares face and wears it like some sort of haloween mask while the former body lies rotting in EAs cellar.
 

TheBelgianGuy

New member
Aug 29, 2010
365
0
0
Back in the day, games costed 40~ euro's, and with the CD came a nice manual with plenty of explanation, hints and tips about the game... sometimes an art book, or a map of the ingame world, or a spreadsheet of the ingame technology / building tree...

Nowadays, game costs 50-60 euro's, the game manual tells pretty nothing besides controls and installation requirements, and the only extra you're getting is a small piece of paper with your online activation code you need to use to play, that is if their servers actually work... and for the full game experience, you need to buy DLC they cut out of the game.

Such a shame. Call me nostalgic, but I think the gaming industry was a lot more cooler and friendlier back in the day. (Not that the games were any better, though.)
 

Kikosemmek

New member
Nov 14, 2007
471
0
0
<-- User upholds avoid-Bioware-products business model.

I'm not going to wade into a pseudo-philosophical argument here. If this is what they want to do, then this is simply my response. Thanks for the good times in any case, Bioware. BG, IWD, NWN made my childhood happier than otherwise!
 

edos63

New member
Apr 5, 2012
20
0
0
Hatchetman said:
This just sounds like BioWare saying something controversial so people remember ME3 exists. Do they happen to have new DLC launching soon?
Why yes they do. This time they're going to sell the underwater gimmic to us. Maybe it will be good, but considering Bioware's and EA's bullshit tactics and the lame DLC they have put out so far for the game, I doubt it.
 

Krantos

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,840
0
0
Why do so many companies confuse "Happy to" with "willing to?"

Seriously, this is why we need to stop buying DLC we think is exploitative. Companies don't care if you whine about it, they only care if you bought it.

Buying it is an endorsement of their practices. Don't like them? Stop flipping buying!
 

cidbahamut

New member
Mar 1, 2010
235
0
0
tmande2nd said:
Bioware is simply dead to me.
This.

I don't care how good the games they make are, it's not worth putting up with the corporate shenanigans.
I'm not happy with these new business models.
I'm not happy to open my wallet for this crap.
I'm pissed off and have simply stopped buying their games because I don't approve of this tomfoolery.

I have no faith left in Bioware.
 

Aircross

New member
Jun 16, 2011
658
0
0
Is this Bioware talking or EA talking?

Actually, don't answer that.

Bioware IS EA.

Let's see how long EA will keep Bioware alive sucking away the developer's soul for cash.
 

Darkmantle

New member
Oct 30, 2011
1,031
0
0
Huh.

well I still think Day1 DLC and project 10 dollar are horrible practices, but I am actually completely okay with the micro transactions as they have been implemented in ME3 multiplayer. The packs being randomized prevents the game from being "pay to win", and I find the packs very reasonable priced with the in game currency. It never feels necessary to pay real money to compete in ME3, and that's the way it should be.

so one out of three ain't bad?
 

mental_looney

New member
Apr 29, 2008
522
0
0
Well if someone wants to spend real money on the supply packs you can buy for in game currency and it gets me free multi player DLC, then I am not going to stop them.

The amount of people willing to spend money is clearly enough to sustain the amount of people not doing it and give them free multiplayer stuff. It's coop so there is no pay to win against other players.

While gamers on the internet may be up in arms about it sad fact is we are going to be out numbered by people who don't care, don't know about the business side at all and just want more stuff now. Companies won't change if people still want to give them money.
 

putowtin

I'd like to purchase an alcohol!
Jul 7, 2010
3,452
0
0
Fr said:
anc[is]As obnoxious as I find the gambling to be, it's still not as spammy or obnoxious as say Saints Row 3 or Dungeon Defenders.
kinda this. I'm of the opinion that you buy what you want, I have no interest in paying for new gusn (for the main game or multiplayer) but dlc like "Leviathan" that add to the story, I will pick up.
 

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
Why can't he just say something to the effect of, "Yeah, it's pretty much just for the money."

I'm not sure how many other people out there are like this (if there are enough to make any particular difference to their profits), but I don't exactly buy a game brand-spanking-new when I know the whole game will cost, what, $30 or $40 more?

I still haven't touched Mass Effect 3.
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
Marshall Honorof said:
For those who might scoff at Mass Effect 3's DLC and microtransactions, Melo did offer one interesting point: These sales subsidized the game's plentiful free multiplayer DLC, ensuring that players get a steady stream of varied content, and that developers get to stay on the Mass Effect 3 team.
Because that's all that really matters in this day and age isn't it? The Multiplayer. You'd think all that money would at least earn us another gameplay mode.
A good solid co-op mode would be nice. And maybe some games you can play on your own and have fun, but everyone knows nobody buys those anymore...
 

Rahuzero

New member
Jul 22, 2011
10
0
0
The thing I hate about micro-transactions is that if forces the game to be random. In ME3 multiplayer it doesn't take skill to get better gear it takes luck.Out of all the characters colors,weapon mods,gear upgrades and weapons themselves the chances of me getting my M99 ONCE let alone 8 more times is so low; whats the point of playing?
 

Dendio

New member
Mar 24, 2010
701
0
0
90 percent of their DLC has been FREE.

Ending patches, multiplayer expansions all FREE
The only dlc we have paid for up to now is from ashes for 10 bucks.

The article makes it seem like its the other way around.
 

Aggieknight

New member
Dec 6, 2009
229
0
0
Rahuzero said:
The thing I hate about micro-transactions is that if forces the game to be random[u/]. In ME3 multiplayer it doesn't take skill to get better gear it takes luck.Out of all the characters colors,weapon mods,gear upgrades and weapons themselves the chances of me getting my M99 ONCE let alone 8 more times is so low; whats the point of playing?

This x 1000.

I am totally down with paying for DLC. What I hated with the fires of a thousand suns was the "Baseball cards" aspect of the ME3 Multiplayer.

Everyone needs to get their heads on straight - the MP DLC for ME3 wasn't free. It cost you 8-40 hrs of time to "earn" or ~$20.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
I prefer DLC to be released earlier rather than later. Because i get bored with a game after a few months and am usually playing something else. Also, if it is released day one, thats fine if its worth buying. But people who moan can just wait and purchase it in 3 months if they want to. But if your going to buy it anyway why wait 3 months when you can enjoy it now? DLC is just an extra, its not mandatory that you have to buy it. Its there, its released, its up to you, same as all those bullshit clothes etc for your avatar guy.