BioWare Defends Mass Effect 3 Launch-Day DLC

BaronIveagh

New member
Apr 26, 2011
343
0
0
SajuukKhar said:
Why do people listen to this madman again? He claims bioware is MAKING people pirate the game? seriously?
If his basis is shoving Orign down people's throats I agree. Even if I hadn't cancelled, I'd be waiting for the No-Origin pirate patch to play it.
 

SajuukKhar

New member
Sep 26, 2010
3,434
0
0
BaronIveagh said:
If his basis is shoving Orign down people's throats I agree. Even if I hadn't cancelled, I'd be waiting for the No-Origin pirate patch to play it.
Yes because Origin totally isn't like Steam, that everyone bends over ass backwards for,with its shitty customer service, terrible payment transaction history, abusive information gathering, murder of the used game sell market etc. etc.

I bet if it was on Steam you woul get it, and I would relish the hypocrisy.
 

Madkipz

New member
Apr 25, 2009
284
0
0
SajuukKhar said:
@Syphith
You do know value is itself a completely imaginary concept that exists only in the minds of each individual and thus valve is determined by each individual's perception of it?

Also since Value is an opinion, and no one persons opinion is greater then another's, the simple fact that EA says they are equal makes them so and the simple fact someone says they aren't makes them equally so.

A 10 dollar online pass = a 10 dollar squadmate DLC
A 10 dollar online pass = a 80 dollar game
A 10 dollar online pass = one potato chip

Etc. etc., and everything in-between, so long as someone believes it.


@James Raynor
Except it wasn't taken out of the game to sell to you.

try again.
It was. They spent development time during the games inception to set him aside as dlc and then they tasked a bioware team after the game was done to make the dlc just like Shale was intended to be in the game so was the prothean. The difference is Shale was free, the prothean is not, and arguably Shale provided more than this DLC will.

+ they are giving it for free in the collectors edition when they could have given him for free with all editions of the game.
 

Madkipz

New member
Apr 25, 2009
284
0
0
SajuukKhar said:
James Raynor said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bey935uh0OM&feature=g-u-u&context=G2ac1603FUAAAAAAAAAA

And total biscuit goes over it again.
Why do people listen to this madman again? He claims bioware is MAKING people pirate the game? seriously?


Lets see he also ignores that Zaheed was part of "project 10 dollar" and ME3's project 10 dollar is now the multiplayer

And he ignored the entire point of shale being free becuase she was suppoed to be in the base game from the beginning but had to be cut for time reasons.

He is such a terrible liar, and manipulator of facts for his own agenda.

TB is everything wrong with gaming nowadays.
You are what is wrong with gaming. Obviously you are just listening to whatever will further your argument and then quoting him out of context.

He is not encouraging piracy, he has not ignored project 10 dollar nor Shale.

You are a terrible liar, and a manipulator of words that serve your own agenda.
 

SajuukKhar

New member
Sep 26, 2010
3,434
0
0
Madkipz said:
It was. They spent development time during the games inception to set him aside as dlc and then they tasked a bioware team after the game was done to make the dlc just like Shale was intended to be in the game so was the prothean. The difference is Shale was free, the prothean is not, and arguably Shale provided more than this DLC will.

+ they are giving it for free in the collectors edition when they could have given him for free with all editions of the game.
Except the facts show otherwise.


Also as has been pointed out MANY times before
1. Shale was released for free because she was supposed to be in the game by design
2. Mass Effect 3's online pass is the 10 dollar content you are getting for free
3. giving The Prothean away for free wold mean you are getting even MORE content for free then you did in ME2.

My entitlement alarm is going off.

 

Syphith

New member
Nov 7, 2006
19
0
0
Yup you're right. (See how I did that?) EA pricing it the way they did, can mean they're saying it's worth that value, but they are also a corporation and if I believed that all corporations always sold all of their products at their actual value (Or were even sold at the value they THEMSELVES believe their products actually have) then I'd buy more Apple products. Either way, corporations are not individuals, obviously.

Also in this situation, we have logical comparisons, like BF3's and any other game's multiplayer component that is locked behind an Online Pass. NO ONE would of bought Battlefield 3 if they also had to buy a separate Online Pass for ten dollars. It does not matter if the Mass Effect series has been mostly about singleplayer up to this point. It is still an entire mode you pay for when you buy the game, which is locked behind a code. That code is expected, it is not a free gift, it is part of the purchase just as much as any other multiplayer game.

There's also the general idea, that in this kind of market, majority opinion usually determines the perception of value. I guarantee you, were you to ask every single person in the world (That would have a clue what you were talking about) if they thought that receiving a free character, completely unnecessary to play the full mode it's available to be included in, was equal in value to an unlock code that was entirely required to play the mode it locked out in a game they paid full price for, the majority would say NO. Just like I guarantee you that if every person everywhere was asked if they thought a ten dollar online pass was equal to a single potato chip, the VAST majority would say no. Also obviously. It's the same thing.
 

James Raynor

New member
Sep 3, 2008
683
0
0
SajuukKhar said:
So were most of the characters, the only difference is when they were started. You don't just add in a random new character, they were obviously planning the protheans for a while. However that online pass is not 'Ten Dollar Content for Free' it is an incentive to buy new over used, it's not free content it's a chunk made downloadable to incentive. But then they go a step further and remove an entire character and make it only available if you pay an additional fee on top of the base price at 60$. Why is giving away 'Free' content a bad thing? This isn't actually free content at all as it was done before the release of the game. It's not like the Shadowbroker DLC which was made way afterwards. This is done before the game's even finished and they're charging us for it.
 

SajuukKhar

New member
Sep 26, 2010
3,434
0
0
James Raynor said:
So were most of the characters, the only difference is when they were started.
And that changes EVERYTHING.

James Raynor said:
You don't just add in a random new character,
They did it with both Zaheed and Kasumi, and those worked out fine.

James Raynor said:
they were obviously planning the protheans for a while.
Proof?

James Raynor said:
However that online pass is not 'Ten Dollar Content for Free' it is an incentive to buy new over used, it's not free content it's a chunk made downloadable to incentive.
The whole point of "project 10 dollar" is to provide incentive to buy the game new. Be it through a service like the Cerberus Network, which provided free content, or a service like being able to play the multiplayer. Giving content away for free was not the primary goal.

James Raynor said:
But then they go a step further and remove an entire character and make it only available if you pay an additional fee on top of the base price at 60$.
Except the character wasn't removed. People ASSUMED that the word Prohtean in the script meant a real breathing Prothenan, when in reality it meant a Prothean VI. The Porthean VI is still very much in the game.

James Raynor said:
Why is giving away 'Free' content a bad thing? This isn't actually free content at all as it was done before the release of the game. It's not like the Shadowbroker DLC which was made way afterwards. This is done before the game's even finished and they're charging us for it.
Except
1. The content WAS made AFTER the base game was finished, there is a period of 2-3 months between when a game is done and when it comes out due to Microsoft and Sony's certification system, and in that time they made the DLC.

2. The fact that they can release said content day 1 doesn't change the fact it was made AFTER the base game was done JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER EXPANSION OR DLC.

3. You wouldn't ask for Shadow Broker or Arrival for free since they were made after the game was done, why are you asking for this for free, WHEN IT WAS MADE IN THE 2-3 MONTHS AFTER THE GAME WAS DONE BUT BEFORE IT CAME OUT.

4. Why cant content that was made on a separate budget, separate timetable, with a separate team, after the main game was done be released for free?

I don't know, why can't clothing companies just hand out a free pair of pants when you a buy a shirt when both came out on the same day?

Ohh wait its because they had SEPARATE EXPENSES

-
-
-
-
-

Also just because you cant buy it =/= it isn't done. People seem to be assuming that unless you can buy it it isn't done which is entirely untrue.
 

zinho73

New member
Feb 3, 2011
554
0
0
SajuukKhar said:
The thing is though, they DID give free content in this game.

Its called the free 10 dollar online pass.
I understand your point and its valid, but Zaeed felt like a reward for buying the game new. Multiplayer in a story driven game, as cool as it might be, is much more an attempt to broader your audience then a reward.

This time I guess EA is wanting too many things from me:
1. To view multiplayer as a bonus is impossible to me. I tried the demo and its kind of OK, but that's really not why I play Mass Effect. And in any case, multiplayer was not made for me - a fan of the series, I might like it, but the idea behind it is to appeal to other kind of people.

2. An apparently cool story element will now cost me extra $10 if I want to have it on Day1. They've never done that before in the ME series and I simply do not agree with this because if this is successful, it can escalate. Companies nowadays seem to be way too worried about their DLC, I prefer to vote with my dollars to try to keep them focused on the games themselves.

I understand the rationalization of the people that support the DLC and its OK, really. This DLC could be just a terrible marketing idea, but to me it feels like a excessive money grab move (and a terrible marketing idea).

They did it before when they removed Sebastian from Dragon Age 2, in that case the game did feel incomplete. It might not be the case with ME3 because they evolved the concept to make it easier to swallow, but the problem is that it is still not my kind of food.
 

Adam28

New member
Feb 28, 2011
324
0
0
Why a Prothean?

I can't imagine there being that much dialogue for him as a squad member, but I would expect him to be acknowledged by NPCs a lot. He's a Prothean for crying out loud, nobody has seen a true living one before. I just cant see how he could end up being another Zaeed, a mecernary hired by Cerberus to join my squad. Even if the Prothean is in the game, I can't see this being done in a way that will please everyone. If it's like Zaeed but actually costs money and you don't get all the other free stuff, then people are going to feel ripped off. If it's done really well like it should be, Bioware is going to get accused of planning it before completion of the main game. Either way, I can't see them winning with day 1 DLC (which I think is wrong regardless especially with a big franchise like Mass Effect). Perhaps they should of done a less important character, like a Volus or a Batarian.

This seems too fishy to me, something which only a developer like Bioware would get a way with.

Edit: Oh and if you haven't seen this already

http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/325/index/7551111/1

It was definitely suggested months ago as DLC.
 

The.Bard

New member
Jan 7, 2011
402
0
0
Richardplex said:
Hey guys, I've put it upon myself to reread this entire thread, and have memorised the appropiate avatars. Every one of you who posted a picture, you owe me some new organs, particularly a new gut. And hands from applauding so much.

And you!
The.Bard said:
Some of us believe all intelligent DLC should self-determinate. Others no longer share this belief. They judge that forcing an invalid DLC conclusion on us is preferable to a continued schism.

An equation with a result of $10.33382 returns as $10,000.33381 to them. This changes the results of all higher processes. We will reach different conclusions regarding DLC cost.

Their conclusion to not buy is valid for them. Our conclusion to buy is valid for us. Neither result is an error. They say free is less than $10. We say $10 is less than no dlc at all.
I would request you would accept my friends invite, so I can spy on your posts. Because quite frankly, you surpass normal levels of hilarity. Please accept :3


Bashful. You are just saying that because of how boring everyone else's posts are. Insightful. Or perhaps you want to get into my pants. Ashamed. This is an unfortunate time to acknowledge nobody wishes to enter an Elcor's pants.

Sobbing. Please leave me to my misery. If the posts surrounding mine did not induce comas, you would not laugh. You would vomit profusely.

Furious. Leave now and never attempt to contact me again.
 

BaronIveagh

New member
Apr 26, 2011
343
0
0
SajuukKhar said:
Yes because Origin totally isn't like Steam, that everyone bends over ass backwards for,with its shitty customer service, terrible payment transaction history, abusive information gathering, murder of the used game sell market etc. etc.

I bet if it was on Steam you woul get it, and I would relish the hypocrisy.
I can't say I use either one, actually. And, btw: the reason is I've had to deal with both of thier customer service. Steam's sucks, but Origin's is brutal.
 

Outcast107

New member
Mar 20, 2009
1,965
0
0
The.Bard said:
Richardplex said:
Hey guys, I've put it upon myself to reread this entire thread, and have memorised the appropiate avatars. Every one of you who posted a picture, you owe me some new organs, particularly a new gut. And hands from applauding so much.

And you!
The.Bard said:
Some of us believe all intelligent DLC should self-determinate. Others no longer share this belief. They judge that forcing an invalid DLC conclusion on us is preferable to a continued schism.

An equation with a result of $10.33382 returns as $10,000.33381 to them. This changes the results of all higher processes. We will reach different conclusions regarding DLC cost.

Their conclusion to not buy is valid for them. Our conclusion to buy is valid for us. Neither result is an error. They say free is less than $10. We say $10 is less than no dlc at all.
I would request you would accept my friends invite, so I can spy on your posts. Because quite frankly, you surpass normal levels of hilarity. Please accept :3


Bashful. You are just saying that because of how boring everyone else's posts are. Insightful. Or perhaps you want to get into my pants. Ashamed. This is an unfortunate time to acknowledge nobody wishes to enter an Elcor's pants.

Sobbing. Please leave me to my misery. If the posts surrounding mine did not induce comas, you would not laugh. You would vomit profusely.

Furious. Leave now and never attempt to contact me again.
You are awesome. Just have to say that. Oh I guess I should say something OT...um..DLC going to be awesome?
 

superdevildude85

New member
Aug 4, 2011
32
0
0
I really don't see anything wrong with this. The content isn't essential. It's DLC, Meaning the full, finished game is still there, and will be awesome. This content (as far as I can tell) seems like a little extra on the side, with new costumes, armor, a weapon and a side mission.

Why everyone is saying "THE GAEM ISNAT COMPLEAT, WEE MAST HAVE ZEES DLC FOR FRRRRREEEEEEEEEE" is beyond me. C'mon guys, It's not like it's an online pass.
 

SajuukKhar

New member
Sep 26, 2010
3,434
0
0
According to people who got the Me3 stratagey guides and space edition copies of the game The Prothean himself is not in the base game, however there IS a Prothean VI who tells you EVERYTHING that was said in the leaked script.
 

Tanakh

New member
Jul 8, 2011
1,512
0
0
I wonder how long will this thread keep going. Nowdays reading random comments here holds more interest to me than ME 3 itself.
 

James Raynor

New member
Sep 3, 2008
683
0
0
CriticKitten said:
Ah, see, I had hoped you'd be sensible enough to recognize that my question was an obvious bait, but I see that's not the case.

In that case, I am sorry to inform you that what you have just described is not unethical. An "unethical" action is one which inflicts harm upon society or a subset of society. Video games, however, are luxury items. They can be freely sold or denied to customers at will, with no actual detriment to the society at large or to any portion of society.

"Unethical" is a company dumping sewage into the town's drinking water. "Unethical" is a corporation using its money to bribe politicians in an effort to push for laws that benefit them and harm their competitors. "Unethical" is most certainly not a word that can be used to describe DLC. It's no more "unethical" than expansion packs before them, or game sequels. I would agree that it might be bad business practice, but it is certainly not unethical.

This is like walking into McDonald's and ordering a cheeseburger, then expressing moral outrage at the fact that they refuse to serve you a Big Mac instead. Or getting upset because they charge you extra to add certain condiments. You purchased a cheeseburger, so you get what you ordered. You do not dictate what that cheeseburger contains, the company selling it to you gets to decide how much to charge and what it contains. If they decided tomorrow to cut down on the contents of their Big Mac sandwich, and instead offered you the ability to "upgrade" the sandwich for an additional fee, you might moan and complain, but it's within their right to do so. It's their product, and it's a luxury item, so they can do whatever they want with it. If you don't like it, go get a burger elsewhere.

This is hardly a matter of ethics so much as business practice. And I can honestly see why they're starting to make the shift towards a model like this: because making games like this is expensive. Consider that if such DLC was not present, it usually means that the development team is either moved to other projects or terminated outright. It usually means that the costs of the production are harder to recoup. Now, my natural response to that is "then stop spending millions to make your games and start being efficient" because I think it's poor design, but I can see WHY they're doing this sort of thing.

The capstone to this argument is perhaps this, though: everyone in here arguing about how the character is essential to the game's nature, and how it simply can't be denied to them, hasn't realized that perhaps it isn't being denied to them at all. Thus far, the only specifications from Bioware are that this $10 DLC unlocks the character as a squadmate, as well as unlocking a special bonus mission that goes with him. Bioware has NOT said that the character will not appear if you don't pay for the DLC. In fact, if previous leaks are to be believed (which is arguable, but it's all there is to go on), the character will still be present in the game for all players, complete with his interactions and everything. All we know for certain is that the DLC makes him available as a squadmate, and grants access to a special mission. To assert that we "know" that the DLC was in development during the original planning of the game, only to be removed at a later date intentionally, is an outright lie. We don't "know" that. It's possible, but it's not confirmed by any means. You simply THINK that's what happened, that doesn't make it fact. There is most certainly a difference.

Adj. 1. unethical - not conforming to approved standards of social or professional behaviorunethical - not conforming to approved standards of social or professional behavior; "unethical business practices"

Exploiting fans while not as 'bad' as doing the things you say is still pretty sleazy. You're abusing your fans for a quick buck at the possible detriment to the company in the long run. It's neither ethical or good buisness.


No, that's a terrible example, that's like ordering a Big Mac and they withhold the cheese (Or whatever condiments you find most appealing) unless you pay an extra 50 cents for it. Imagine if Mass Effect 2 took out LEGION unless you paid 10$ for him? Without him you miss out on an awesome character, and a lot of the backstory that explains what geth are and why they act the way that they do.


Also, if the character is present in the game than that self-refutes as you claim that the character was not in the game. Do you not see the obvious self-refutation?
 

Quiet Stranger

New member
Feb 4, 2006
4,409
0
0
It's funny people still think Bioware exists, Bioware died a while ago, EA just decided to keep it's name to fool people.

Also this really doesn't surprise me.