Which makes Mass Effect 1's DRM "forgiving and light". This pushes me into "buy it when it's in the bargain bins" territory. At least Steam's version is without extra DRM (again, like Mass Effect 1).As DRM goes, this is probably one of the most forgiving and light systems around
I'd say its more terrifying then sad. Since people seem to be OK with all this.unwesen said:It fills me with sadness that we have been worn down to the point that this is the essence of the reaction to a DRM system; it should be more like "HULK SMASH!!!"As DRM goes, this is probably one of the most forgiving and light systems around
well this might be frowned upon but i'm probably going to download it to my brothers computer and my roommates computer, if that means anything. they both wanted to see what the game was like (my roommate is actually one of those people who buys nearly every game in new condition even after i've let him play near the damn whole game.) so i figured with this i could just let them install it there and give it a whirl.Onyx Oblivion said:Why the hell has five gaming rigs to install it to, especially?meganmeave said:Five computers in 24 hours? Who the hell installs on five systems?
Yeah, exactly the attitude I expected. You don't like being treated like a thief... Then stop blaming the companies and start blaming the thieves. Though in your case it seems your supporting the thieves because "I don't want to fill forms out and be on the internet to play".Mcoffey said:What can I say, I don't like being treated like a thief. If that makes me a bad person or "Part of the problem", well I suppose I'll just have to live with that. It'll be a struggle, but I'm sure I'll find a way to carry on.
I've not said it does much of anything to counter piracy, not once. I said its at least an attempt at doing something. I know DRM can be cracked in a matter of hours... Do you not think I read? Still they do it because its better than doing nothing. There not doing it to simply look good, they are doing it to at least try to prevent it. Again for the third time, doing something that may or may not draw away customers purely for show is counter intuitive... Do you not think that developers would still be using it if it was just for show? Do you think that they'd actually intentionally draw away costumers just so they can look good? It makes very little sense. They'd be no benefit to it.Mcoffey said:But you're completely deluded if you think DRM actually does anything to counter Piracy.
DRM is cracked in a matter of hours. Do you not understand that? Developers know this. They know their DRM does nothing to stop piracy, and it is purely there to make it look like they are doing something, even though they know they can do nothing. Sometimes the appearance of control is almost as good as actually having it.
Only for single player offline games. Its easier to track people who are playing online with pirated games and thus easier to prevent. Meaning that creating a game for the consoles is less likely to lead in piracy. Which is why FPS's are the big guns now... Because people like to play online and shoot, they can't do that for long on pirated FPS games and thus they are safe investments.Mcoffey said:Also the shift towards console gaming has very little to do with piracy. As I understand it Console piracy is every bit as prevalent as PC piracy. The shift to consoles has more to do with accessibility and content control, but that's another discussion altogether.
Pretty much this and I'm getting it on Xbox so I wonder what nonsense I have to worry about. Probably something similar.Sovvolf said:Nope, because putting up measures to protect their property means they are the evulz. I love it how people blame the companies for putting up the DRM and very little blame goes to the pirates, who, if it hadn't been for them we wouldn't be in this predicament.Nutcase said:EA isn't going to get a cent from me.
I guess its easier to blame the big "evilz" company with a face rather than blaming the thieves. Because you know, they are the virtual Robin Hoods that steal from the rich and give to the poor meaning that game companies have to increase security which harms the paying customer.
Christ these pirates are ruining the gaming, music and movie industries and people are cheering them on as they are doing it.
I think it's more the fact that it's easier to blame a publisher as the face of evil than the face in the mirror. If we stopped accepting piracy, and by that I mean if we started to shun and ostracize people who pirated games, then piracy would be much less of an issue today.Sovvolf said:Nope, because putting up measures to protect their property means they are the evulz. I love it how people blame the companies for putting up the DRM and very little blame goes to the pirates, who, if it hadn't been for them we wouldn't be in this predicament.Nutcase said:EA isn't going to get a cent from me.
I guess its easier to blame the big "evilz" company with a face rather than blaming the thieves. Because you know, they are the virtual Robin Hoods that steal from the rich and give to the poor meaning that game companies have to increase security which harms the paying customer.
Christ these pirates are ruining the gaming, music and movie industries and people are cheering them on as they are doing it.
Your right. Pirates are the main problem. Most of the time, they're assholes with an overinflated sense of entitlement.Sovvolf said:Nope, because putting up measures to protect their property means they are the evulz. I love it how people blame the companies for putting up the DRM and very little blame goes to the pirates, who, if it hadn't been for them we wouldn't be in this predicament.
I guess its easier to blame the big "evilz" company with a face rather than blaming the thieves. Because you know, they are the virtual Robin Hoods that steal from the rich and give to the poor meaning that game companies have to increase security which harms the paying customer.
Christ these pirates are ruining the gaming, music and movie industries and people are cheering them on as they are doing it.
I guess it would be a start but the problem is that they will always slip through. Maybe under a different guise. I do imagine it will hinder it though. That being said... A large crackdown could also hurt innocents too, I mean... File sharing sites aren't just for pirating. We have people who like to legitimately share files, some times its home-made movies, music and such.spartan231490 said:then, all they have to do to stop pirating is bring the law down on any file-share site that has their game at all, and check for modding of systems to play the game without disc.
Hence why I said any file-sharing site that has the game which has no legal online copies. means that it is definitely pirated. Suddenly file-sharing sites will have a reason to add some minor protection. Of course it won't stop all of them, but it will stop more than DRM does.Sovvolf said:I guess it would be a start but the problem is that they will always slip through. Maybe under a different guise. I do imagine it will hinder it though. That being said... A large crackdown could also hurt innocents too, I mean... File sharing sites aren't just for pirating. We have people who like to legitimately share files, some times its home-made movies, music and such.spartan231490 said:then, all they have to do to stop pirating is bring the law down on any file-share site that has their game at all, and check for modding of systems to play the game without disc.
I agree and admit that DRM is not the way to go about it. They need a much better system, this is punishing the customers true enough and I don't find it fair at all. However, people are putting the blame squarely on the companies who are just trying to protect their property. Very few are pointing their fingers at the real bad guys here, the worse thing about it is that people are actually cheering these people on.Irridium said:Your right. Pirates are the main problem. Most of the time, they're assholes with an overinflated sense of entitlement.Sovvolf said:Nope, because putting up measures to protect their property means they are the evulz. I love it how people blame the companies for putting up the DRM and very little blame goes to the pirates, who, if it hadn't been for them we wouldn't be in this predicament.
I guess its easier to blame the big "evilz" company with a face rather than blaming the thieves. Because you know, they are the virtual Robin Hoods that steal from the rich and give to the poor meaning that game companies have to increase security which harms the paying customer.
Christ these pirates are ruining the gaming, music and movie industries and people are cheering them on as they are doing it.
That being said, trying to beat them by putting shitloads of copy-protection on games that punish legitimate consumers is not the way to go about this. There are better ways to go about it, and they're going the "lets just be bigger dicks" route.
Yes pirates are assholes, but publishers are acting just as assholish as pirates. So forgive me if I'm not sympathetic.