Not interested in DA2, just felt the need to comment on DRM in general.
It is pointless!
Why do publishers insist on jamming this crap down the throats of paying customers? Time and time again people crack the DRM of high-profile titles, like DA, and that's that.
Pirates play a DRM-free version with minimal hassle, while the legitimate customers get the privilege of submitting to spot checks and get to enjoy the benefit of install limits.
What part of this makes sense? It's arguably an old argument against DRM, but that's because it's true.
If someone says "I pirated it because I didn't like the DRM" I'd call bullshit (unless it's the Ubisoft always-online DRM, good grief).
A result stemming from the Ubi DRM is that news outlets and similar are starting to call DRM that are still very limiting when using a portable device (laptop) and on holiday to some location with spotty Wi-fi, "...nowhere near 'draconian,'".
English not being my first language, I can't really say how strong an expression like "draconian" is on the scale of Bad <-> Really Bad.
I can however say that thinking that we're not getting shafted because this DRM happens to be less nasty than the other DRM is a fatal mistake.
I don't pirate games. Period.
What upsets me though, as a legitimate customer, is the fact that individuals using cracked versions of the game get a more versatile (and as such better) product than I am.
Why do we gamers accept this?