If by only one Bioware game you mean "every bioware game is the same due to the things I listed" then yeah. I've played only one Bioware game.SpiderJerusalem said:So, I take it you've played only one Bioware game then?
Dragon age 2 could have been a step in the right direction story-wise, but it was rushed, so the story is disjointed.SpiderJerusalem said:Not Dragon Age or Mass Effect 2?
I think we can agreen that if a lot of people do the same thing, that thing doesn't become good all of the suddenly. It might be influental, but it still remains shit.SpiderJerusalem said:Or haven't just read any epic fantasy in the first place.
I concur. I rather like his novels, I finished reading "Revan" recently and at least for those who played and loved Kotor & Kotor 2 it's a great story (also I can not for my life understand why they didn't let him write "ME Deception", now they will have to remake the book cause it had so many flaws).darth gditch said:Awww.I rather liked his work.
He wasn't Tolkein or Asimov or anything like that, but he did write entertaining novels and scripts. And damnit if Mass Effect isn't my favorite sci-fi universe, so kudos to you, Drew.
Can I ask why? They might release something really good in the future!Gennadios said:Not that I care because I'm not playing any more of their games after ME3.
That I might actually buy!gof22 said:Perhaps it would be a good time for Bioware to hire Neil Gaiman. The next ME game will be called Mass Effect: Galactic Gods. Shepard is hired by someone named Mr. Friday who turns out to be a Turian god.
Care to clarify who these "other people" are? So far I've only saw you and another poster try to prove me wrong. The_root_of_all_evil presented a not very good diagram and people have pointed it out, but only two people tried to prove me wrong(someone who written his thoughts, not copied someone a diagram from someone).SpiderJerusalem said:Because as others have also pointed out, the whole "they're all the same!" argument doesn't hold water unless you're willing (which it seems you are) to grasp at straws and bend the truth quite liberally to bring forth the outcome that suits your express purposes.
I'll agree that the claim that all BioWare games are exactly the same is a bit of a stretch, though I do think it's worth acknowledging that they do have a formula. A forumula that works well, mind you, but it's not exactly innovative.SpiderJerusalem said:So, that's a no then? Because as others have also pointed out, the whole "they're all the same!" argument doesn't hold water unless you're willing (which it seems you are) to grasp at straws and bend the truth quite liberally to bring forth the outcome that suits your express purposes.Imbechile said:If by only one Bioware game you mean "every bioware game is the same due to the things I listed" then yeah. I've played only one Bioware game.SpiderJerusalem said:So, I take it you've played only one Bioware game then?
Mostly, my point was that whoever writes rogues for bioware has a thing for redheads.The Crotch said:SNIP
Who said I was ignoring anything? Mass Effect obviously has a large fanbase, and many of people are looking forward to getting their hands on it... that's why you hear about it a lot. Of course EA is going to market-the-fuck out of something is a guaranteed hit. I'm not gonna troll forums saying "Don't buy it! They just want your money!"... I'm quite certain EA just wants my money... but it's what I get for my money that matters.SurfinTaxt said:thats fine but how can you ignore all the sign that ME3 is just going to be an over hyped cash grab?
While I agree.. I am no fan of Day 1 DLC... from a business standpoint, I can't fault EA for using something that has worked in bringing them extra dollars. I've only purchased the Collector's Edition.. I don't care about all that other DLC that is store-based or Action Figure-Based. It's usually just something like an extra skin or weapon that isn't needed to complete the game. After I get the game, I'll judge available DLC individually and figure out what I think is worth the money.. as with any game... it's quite simple.SurfinTaxt said:Here are just some of the plethora of reasons Im skipping the "conclusion" if you want to call it that.
1) DLC. Now Im fine with good, well though out DLC like the way Rockstar does DLC. I however despise the way EA has gone about it, Day one DLC, DLC already on the disc you need to "unlock", and just take a look at this; http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/01/23/mass-effect-figures-include-mass-effect-3-dlc.aspx
That is MF action figure DLC. And the DLC rewards are randomized at that . . . so real collection obsessed fans can buy multiple sets of the same action figure, or so Ive heard.
I keep hearing this "It's not Bioware anymore, it's EA" crap everywhere. So what? What does that really mean? Yes, "Bioware's" games haven't changed much since KOTOR... and yet "Bioware" is still a name that sells games (and yes, I know EA uses that to their advantage).. what matters is that there are a group of people (Call them EA, or call them Bioware) that is making games like Mass Effect or Dragon Age, or TOR... if you still enjoy those games (you don't, I'm guessing)... then who "really" makes them doesn't matter.SurfinTaxt said:2)The auxiliary characters are pathetically badly designed. Chobot? Freddie prinze? The fuck outta here. Rasta Prothean? Theyre 0 for 3 right out of the gate, and I have no faith in EA (yes it is EA wearing Bioware's skin) to make the others any better. This would be great if I wanted to play Mass Effect the comedy special, but to me that not the appeal. Fuck freddie prinze jr. poser *****.
I haven't played the demo, so I can't judge yet. But I like how you refer to it as "forced emotional manipulation" (Big Brother EA at it again). As if they're trying to control your emotions. How about... they're presenting you with a situation.. and maybe it will get a reaction from you? It didn't work for you obviously... but that's ok, not everyone is affected by stimuli the same way. Some people are moved by images or events on films/games/books/etc... and some aren't. I might also feel the moment falls flat, just like you.. it happens.. guess we'll see.SurfinTaxt said:3)forced emotional manipulation. The human kid getting blown up in the demo? what the hell was the point of that? Are we supposed to feel bad about some dumbass kid we see for 5 seconds, that runs away from us like a retard? Just ham fisted drama, and I dont see it getting less hamfisted
As opposed to figuratively?.... OT: I donno, maybe I just don't knit pick as much. None of the textures that I've seen so far have bothered me... but I'm not much of a graphics-nazi. I'm not getting it for the multiplayer. I'll admit, the changing of writers does have me worried... as it's never a good sign to change writers in the middle of anything. But demos usually aren't the best way to judge a final product. So I'll wait and see it for myself when it's out. All I know is... I don't hate what I've seen, and I love ME1 & ME2 so... that's why ME3 is a sure buy.SurfinTaxt said:I could literally go on and on about every single thing that sets off alarm bells . . . Horde mode, create your own single player mode, the obvious laziness from what ive seen in the demo (shit textures for one, and the uncanny valley problems), male shephard running like he has a perpetually dirty ass, the lead writer leaving the company for MAC FUCKING WALTERS to take over is enough evidence alone to make me avoid this game.
OH you're one of those.... ok well I guess I just wasted all my time here. I think ME2 was fantastic...SurfinTaxt said:I think when fans play this game, well, im hoping they look back at ME2 and realize that that game isnt all that.
When I say depth I mean that you can get to know the characters, their backstories, and even if their personalities seem similar (a point I'll give you) the characters themselves have different reasons for those personalities. To me, being similar is X caused Y, which the characters themselves don't have. I'll also give you that bit about saving the world, it is pretty annoying, which is one of the reasons I like DA2 (despite its problems) and ME2.Imbechile said:What depth? You mean Emo-boys Carth Onasi and Kaidan Alenko. Alistairs and Morringans "were fighting and arguing over stupid things like we're children" personality. To avoid confusion: There are some nicely written characters, but they still feel too similar to companions in other games. Also, the cringe inducing romance don't help. I will give you the characters, but what about the same old "The chosen one saves the world from the big evil" bullshit that they always write in desperate attempt to make the game epic.Warachia said:The characters have more depth to them than just 5-6 personalities.
I agree there, but a better argument to make in the beginning would be that no matter the objective, you accomplish it the same way. I guess this is where I like Bioware games best, with the sidequests to fully flesh out the places you visit, as I feel they add a lot to the game and help the areas. Can't argue if that's not your thing though.Imbechile said:The still go to four or five hubs(there's nothing wrong with that type of design, but when you constantly do it then it becomes repetitive).Warachia said:and that last point has you doing COMPLETELY SEPERATE THINGS, even generalizing it becomes stupid and you see how it all comes apart. How is looking for a map the same thing as stopping a villain?
I won't debate about the games being overrated (your opinion) but the sonic one is pretty good, I''d highly recommend it if your looking for a good turn based RPG on the DS. The weird thing about it is how much work that went into the characters and dialogue, it's like hiring an oscar winner to do a childrens film.Imbechile said:And those games are good(A bit overrated, but still good).I don't know about sonic though.Warachia said:Incidentally, they made other games like Baldurs Gate 1+2 (and that sonic game that nobody remembers) that don't fit what you're trying to point out.
Yes, I see how those are similar, but the locations and methods as well as environments and characters that help you are also different, and it seems wrong to throw those out for the sake of generalizing.Imbechile said:I think you can easilly see that games whose story is "The chosen one saves the world from the big evil" are more similar to each other, than games where you have a villain and you explore a world. For instance: Jon Irenicus is a diffrent villain than, say Malak or the Reapers.Warachia said:By your logic every single final fantasy game is the same because the have the same classes, a villain, and you explore an overworld.
Decent games if you don't mind incredibly unforgiving puzzles and controls.Imbechile said:I haven't played king's quest.Warachia said:Why not compare Monkey Island and kings quest
Yes Wolfenstein came first, but everyone says Doom ripoff, so I went with it anyway. Besides, Wolfenstein is a ripoff of Maze War.Imbechile said:But... ,but Doom is a ripoff of Wolfenstein. /sarcasmWarachia said:every FPS is a ripoff of DOOM.
My impression was that the Jedi Knight story was pretty much incurably stupid. If that was in fact his work, it makes me suspect that all the incoherence of ME2 belongs solidly at his feet.animehermit said:With Revan it's not the full story (you'd have to play TOR to get that) and I don't just mean the 4 flashpoints he's involved in (2 for each faction). Drew wrote the Jedi Knight story so it has direct ties to both KOTOR and Revan. The Jedi Knight story is pretty much KOTOR 3.4173 said:I quite enjoy his Darth Bane books, not thrilled with Revan. He's done good work with Bioware, but I'm ready for a new direction.
Which goes to show how bad the writing in that game really is.animehermit said:It's often quoted as one of the best ones in the entire game, right up next to Imperial Agent.Starke said:My impression was that the Jedi Knight story was pretty much incurably stupid. If that was in fact his work, it makes me suspect that all the incoherence of ME2 belongs solidly at his feet.
No, that's a fact, not an "excuse". The Jedi Knight story is about as coherent and well thought out as a drunken frat boy making a pass at you. Come to think of it, about as original and respectful of source material as well. If you call that good writing, you really need to stop playing games and learn to read something that was written by a competent writer.animehermit said:I didn't think so, I just completed it the other day. Got anything else to say other than Bad writing? I just feel that that's a lazy excuse for people who don't really have any ground to stand on in a discussion.