Of course. Note that I didn't berate them for the change. I simply don't like it personally.Hammeroj said:Now, whether you like the change or not is your business.
Of course. Note that I didn't berate them for the change. I simply don't like it personally.Hammeroj said:Now, whether you like the change or not is your business.
That's what they're doing. Instead of perfecting features they don't quite like, they're cutting them for future patches.Monkeyman O said:They should be actually working on getting the game out sometime
Have you seen the side by side comparisons in the link?Hammeroj said:Shove your little kids rhetoric where the sun don't shine. There are plenty of Marios and Zeldas for you to go around. This is a case of a company changing the tone of a franchise completely, then pretending it's still the same. Pardon us children for not being fine with that.
Ah yes fan boy over reaction at its finest.Hammeroj said:Shove your little kids rhetoric where the sun don't shine. There are plenty of Marios and Zeldas for you to go around. This is a case of a company changing the tone of a franchise completely, then pretending it's still the same. Pardon us children for not being fine with that.tmande2nd said:This article reminds me off all the little kids who sobbed about the Tau not being grimdark enough for them in 40k.
Because in this day in age if something is not Black and Grey enough people howl in utter and complete rage.
Ugh this is why I hate so many modern games with their emphasis on GRIMDARK, Black vs Grey, and utterly hopeless worlds.
Good thing the Torchlight devs did in no way, as former Blizzard employees, copy the aesthetic of any game they've ever worked on. Torchlight has, in no way, the aesthetic of WoW and Warcraft 3...Raiyan 1.0 said:Though, honestly, it feels like, to me at least, Diablo's aesthetics have shifted from its previous iterations to something more like Torchlight.Baresark said:They were only doing it to copy off of Torchlight anyway.
Flame away.
Just look at <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.265110-Diablo-III-Looked-Heavenly-in-2005?page=1>these screens, I prefer the older cancelled style much more.
They did actually. Not all of them, sure, but they came in from Flagship, and most people from Flagship were involved with WC3 and WoW (mostly WC3). Max and Eric Schaefer (the founders of Runic) worked on WC3, as well as Diablo2 (Blizzard North)Hammeroj said:They didn't work on Warcraft 3, nor on WoW. As far as I know, they were part of Blizzard North, that was shitcanned some time after Diablo 2: LOD.VladG said:Good thing the Torchlight devs did in no way, as former Blizzard employees, copy the aesthetic of any game they've ever worked on. Torchlight has, in no way, the aesthetic of WoW and Warcraft 3...Raiyan 1.0 said:Though, honestly, it feels like, to me at least, Diablo's aesthetics have shifted from its previous iterations to something more like Torchlight.Baresark said:They were only doing it to copy off of Torchlight anyway.
Flame away.
Just look at <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.265110-Diablo-III-Looked-Heavenly-in-2005?page=1>these screens, I prefer the older cancelled style much more.
OT
This is good news, they actually DO want to release this game sometime in my lifetime...
I'm sure they aren't done with pets for good, they will make an appearance in one of the expansions.
The reason they went with that look is because it's easier to develop low-poly models and weaksauce textures, and that's all there is to that.