AngryMongoose said:
You hear that guys? Blizzard to announce up to one new title before 2014!
My thoughts exactly. /internet high five for perception
Campaign for an already existing game that exists largely as a multiplayer (and is thus influenced by a campaign as CoD is by a map pack) doesn't count as a game in my book and WoW has already been on a yearly expansion plan. In fact, last I heard of it, they wanted to change that to a 6 month rotation, so you might just be looking at 3 WoW expansions there really.
Scrumpmonkey said:
Let me see.. 4 expansions, diablo three and something else only equals "Six titles" in the losest possible terms. When did blizzard stop being a gams company and stary being one massive holding pattern?
Oh right yeah...
Oh and Kudos Activision for wanting "Proven titles" yeah we wouldn't want any yucky original ideas in your stagnation and bllshit salad now would we?
Goddamn, that picture... they might as well have painted Kotick with a chain around Blizzard's neck and a text bubble saying "good *****"
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for sequels, I think they can be terrific things, I love most sequels that are good and don't ***** at them on principle. But Christ, learn to grow instead of attaching yourself to a huge company like some reverse parasite that just funnels money into it. I mean, if ActiVision was a fantastic company that repeatedly did risky and daring things, I'd even be ok with it, but c'mon.