"Simply fighting each other with no other objectives or choices to make gets old relatively quickly,"
sooooo like the game itself then. am i right?
sooooo like the game itself then. am i right?
That's all of Diablo III in a nutshell.while some found it entertaining, most of our testers didn't feel like it was something they'd want to do beyond a few hours
Damnit, I was drinking something while reading this! Now my screen's all messy. Still, I needed a good laugh, so I thank you very much.MikeWehner said:the current state of the Team Deathmatch offering just doesn't fall in line with the "high-quality Blizzard experience."
My thoughts exactly lol, im surprised this was even newsworthy to begin withZenn3k said:Wait...people are still playing Diablo 3?!
this.CriticKitten said:See, I don't understand this decision. Mainly because of this part:....so it would fit right in with the rest of the game, then?MikeWehner said:Blizzard cites several factors leading to its choice to halt work on the mode, including PvP balance issues and a lack of depth.
*rimshot*
that.Zenn3k said:Wait...people are still playing Diablo 3?!
Nope!SmashLovesTitanQuest said:OT: Wait, is there any kind of PvP mode available right now? I've been meaning to go back to Diablo 3 to check it out when PvP hits.
They got restructured and boss change that's what happened. Apple was in the gutters until Steve Jobs came back, Blizzard was good until activision bought it and JW starts leading projects.Atmos Duality said:Nope!SmashLovesTitanQuest said:OT: Wait, is there any kind of PvP mode available right now? I've been meaning to go back to Diablo 3 to check it out when PvP hits.
Still no PvP in D3.
What the hell is going on at Blizzard?
I thought Valve Time was bad, here we have a core, advertised feature of D3 still not existing 7 freaking months after launch.
Or how about Starcraft 2: Heart of the Swarm?
Where the fuck did that go? Did the team get shifted over to make WoW: Pandaland?
The excuse I keep hearing is "Playtesting and balancing". What game takes 2 years to balance, no, what EXPANSION to a game takes 2 years to develop and balance?
Starcraft 2: Wings of Liberty was delayed for a solid year due to the launch of Bnet 2.0, but HotS doesn't get that excuse. I get that developing assets and content takes time, but it shouldn't take nearly that long once the core game and its assets are already in place.
I mean, I don't even buy their products anymore, but I still want to know just so I can understand:
What the hell is going on at Blizzard? Seriously!
You and I have a very different opinion of TL2 and a very different definition of "objectively". The best thing I can say about TL2 is "its D2 but over all worse in every way" ranging from marginally inferior in some ways to significantly inferior in others. And if we are still all ironically moaning about the online requirement on an internet forum, then I'll say I would rather have that added layer of DRM than deal with the epidemic of cheating in TL2.FelixG said:Probably because it is objectively better?
Gotta love it. "some one liked a game that I didn't like? they must be lying to themselves, because I am the end all be all judge of quality and if I didn't like it, it must be objectively shit and no one could possibly have enjoyed it"Self deception at its peak I would say.
You say TL2 is inferior to D2 overall yet lists no reason or why it is inferior at all. You clearly think highly of D3 but lists no positives of how it is better than TL2 or Path of Exile. You call people how say D3 is shit "Torchlight fanboys". Also arguing about the online requirement on an internet forum is not "ironic", it means you don't understand the argument and cheating in TL2 and online DRM has nothing to do with each other.major_chaos said:You and I have a very different opinion of TL2 and a very different definition of "objectively". The best thing I can say about TL2 is "its D2 but over all worse in every way" ranging from marginally inferior in some ways to significantly inferior in others. And if we are still all ironically moaning about the online requirement on an internet forum, then I'll say I would rather have that added layer of DRM than deal with the epidemic of cheating in TL2.FelixG said:Probably because it is objectively better?
EDIT: Silly me how did I miss this smug litle gem
Gotta love it. "some one liked a game that I didn't like? they must be lying to themselves, because I am the end all be all judge of quality and if I didn't like it, it must be objectively shit and no one could possibly have enjoyed it"Self deception at its peak I would say.