I wouldn't say terrible by any means. We did get a bit shafted in some ways, but it was still fun. Before they (supposedly) fixed it in a patch (waaaaay later than they should've), it was a ***** and a half for some people to get it working online, even forwarding ports manually, but my friends and I managed it, and I have a feeling having the full screen to myself and talking on Vent was a lot more fun than I'd have sharing it in split screen. It was also a pain in the ass to have to edit the config files manually to disable crap like auto-aim and mouse smoothing, but after sorting out all of that, it was at least entertaining in co-op (and significantly less so alone).Souplex said:It's one of those games that's meant to be played split-screen co-op. The PC version is apparently terrible. If you have someone who is willing to share a couch for the entirety of the game, go nuts, otherwise it's just pretty good.
AA is a rent. Borderlands is a buy.Starke said:The irony is, I'd actually recomend the opposite, for basically the same reasons. Borderlands is a hillarious, brilliant time sink. Batman AA is a focused ~10 hour game. AA is awesome, but Borderlands has more replayability.Sassafrass said:I'd get it if it's less then £25 or whatever the equivalent value is wherever you are.
But you do need a friend to get the most out of it, really. SP gets a bit boring in Borderlands, I thought.And to answer you in some detail of sorts.Legion said:Would I be better off with Arkham Asylum instead? As that's another game I have my eye on, that or Alan Wake (although that isn't out yet...). I should point out that I like most kinds of game, I like a good story, but I also like mindless shooters every now and again.
Arkham Asylum is a brilliant game and I found it a bit more fun then Borderlands. Mainly because A) You are Batman and B) You are Batman. Oh, and C)The Scarecrow parts are just amazing. It just doesn't have much re-playability in my eyes, though. Story mode has a few collectibles if you want to look them up, some good back story to it if you find the interview tapes with the inmates, a few of which will make you laugh, especially the Jokers. Borderlands on the other hand has seen me clock 6 days over 3 characters, have a blast with a friend in split screen co-op and, at times, made me laugh quite loudly. Also, the gun system which means you very rarely see the dame gun twice. Even though just today me and a friend had exactly the same shot-gun, down to stats and what not.
I'd say pick your buy based on the last game you got. Mindless shooter your last buy? Arkham Asylum. Story game was last buy? Borderlands.
But I'd personally take Batman: AA. It should be cheapish now, I think.
In my honest opinion, it's only fun when you have friends around. I've played it with a few friends on PS3 and had fun, and played it alone and was bored out of my mind.XoXoButterflyXoXo said:I was thinking about buying borderlands, I was wondering if it is anything special, or just like you know another game.
I wouldn't buy it (and yet I did), the game reeks of a colorfully incomplete puzzle with missing pieces. I personally felt cheated as it was one of the few games I looked to with anticipation only to be smacked in the face.XoXoButterflyXoXo said:I was thinking about buying borderlands, I was wondering if it is anything special, or just like you know another game.
Arkham Asylum is in my opinion the better game, and much more fun to play alone. However, Borderlands is much longer and has more replayability.Legion said:Funny, I was going to ask the same thing. It's going pretty cheap right now and I want a game to keep me occupied until Portal 2 and the next Fallout come out.
Rather than make a new thread for it I shall add my question to it:
Would I be better off with Arkham Asylum instead? As that's another game I have my eye on, that or Alan Wake (although that isn't out yet...). I should point out that I like most kinds of game, I like a good story, but I also like mindless shooters every now and again.