How else would Brenda Romero get attention ? Im not sure whos the bigger attention whore, her or John.
Right because its so much more effective to change something your no longer involved in ?Akalabeth said:No, you're reading all sorts of bullshit into her motivations. Tantrum? Throwing a fit? Crying? Why are you making her sound childish when the quote on the matter is anything but childish? If anyone is being childish it's you because you're assuming the worst of her even when it's contrary to the facts.Baresark said:That was quick. I figured it was only a matter of time before someone had something smug to say, but one sentence is very disappointing. It's completely flawed reasoning to remove herself from her position of substantial power just because of some dancers. And her overreaction, even one based off of principles, does not forward her cause in any way. She could have complained after the fact and gotten the rules changed, maybe enlightened people about something she did not agree with. Now she has made a move that is more divisive than anything else. We should all applaud her on her principles, but she gets negative points on her pride. She is literally crying over spilled milk, which by definition is expressing vain regret over that which cannot be changed or undone. Essentially, she could not change this party, but she could change the next one and all others after that. She still might, but she threw a tantrum and threw away her position of influence when that didn't need to happen. I don't disagree with her gripe, but I disagree with how she handled it.Akalabeth said:It's called having principles.Baresark said:TL;DR: I'm all for her fighting against things she doesn't agree with, but martyrdom in this situation and throwing away her position of power is just childish.
Edit: What I'm saying may change based on more information. But right now that is what the situation reads as.
When the strongest statement a person can make is resignation, it doesn't display them as proud and arrogant it displays them as someone who understands their own worth. They know that by resigning the association they're with will be worse off, and they also know that to be complicit in something they so strongly disagree with they de-value themselves both in their own mind and the minds of their supporters.
pft, you just don't get it. They're providing paying jobs to women, they have to put a stop to that.I-Protest-I said:People wearing revealing clothing and dancing? Quick alert the fucking police! There's a music gig I'm going to tomorrow with the same circumstances!
Seriously lass don't upset yourself over such a small thing, a party not to your taste doesn't constitute bad taste and you should get some thicker skin.
Just wish people would calm down over this stuff, there are actual issues to focus on and this detracts from them.Ukomba said:pft, you just don't get it. They're providing paying jobs to women, they have to put a stop to that.I-Protest-I said:People wearing revealing clothing and dancing? Quick alert the fucking police! There's a music gig I'm going to tomorrow with the same circumstances!
Seriously lass don't upset yourself over such a small thing, a party not to your taste doesn't constitute bad taste and you should get some thicker skin.
Yes, because we sure can't deal with any inequality at home until we have COMPLETELY SOLVED IT elsewhere. Dude, that's silly.The Plunk said:A feminist over-reacting to something? It must be a day that ends with a y.
Perhaps people like Adria Richards and this woman should take a trip to Saudi Arabia. Either they would find out what real oppression of women is, or they would find their new homes in the land of sexual repression.
On the contrary. Im not just posting as a gamer with a side interest in this topic. I have qualifications in organisational change management and have been coaching employees, managers and executives on cultural change for many years.Akalabeth said:It's the culture that needs to change, not the organization, and accomplishing the first is not reliant upon the second.Razorback0z said:Right because its so much more effective to change something your no longer involved in ?Akalabeth said:No, you're reading all sorts of bullshit into her motivations. Tantrum? Throwing a fit? Crying? Why are you making her sound childish when the quote on the matter is anything but childish? If anyone is being childish it's you because you're assuming the worst of her even when it's contrary to the facts.Baresark said:That was quick. I figured it was only a matter of time before someone had something smug to say, but one sentence is very disappointing. It's completely flawed reasoning to remove herself from her position of substantial power just because of some dancers. And her overreaction, even one based off of principles, does not forward her cause in any way. She could have complained after the fact and gotten the rules changed, maybe enlightened people about something she did not agree with. Now she has made a move that is more divisive than anything else. We should all applaud her on her principles, but she gets negative points on her pride. She is literally crying over spilled milk, which by definition is expressing vain regret over that which cannot be changed or undone. Essentially, she could not change this party, but she could change the next one and all others after that. She still might, but she threw a tantrum and threw away her position of influence when that didn't need to happen. I don't disagree with her gripe, but I disagree with how she handled it.Akalabeth said:It's called having principles.Baresark said:TL;DR: I'm all for her fighting against things she doesn't agree with, but martyrdom in this situation and throwing away her position of power is just childish.
Edit: What I'm saying may change based on more information. But right now that is what the situation reads as.
When the strongest statement a person can make is resignation, it doesn't display them as proud and arrogant it displays them as someone who understands their own worth. They know that by resigning the association they're with will be worse off, and they also know that to be complicit in something they so strongly disagree with they de-value themselves both in their own mind and the minds of their supporters.
You quoted me, but ignored my first point. She wasn't "leaving a position where she could have made a difference". Her resignation made a grand total difference of *three days*. It was a statement, nothing more.Razorback0z said:*snip*
Is it definitely confirmed that they were hired dancers? The articles seem to imply it, but I haven't seen any outright say it.John Funk said:*snip*