I don't know the exact reason they're trying to stop the resistance other than the "stopping them from wrecking shit" one but it's not as black/white as it appears. I do remember watching one of the Dev. diaries were the writer explains that the story isn't your typical "freedom-fighting underdogs vs. evil, oppressive government forces", both sides think they both have justifiable reasons to do what they are doing. I guess we'll find out more in 4 days. can't wait!GrizzlerBorno said:And is there a perfectly good, informed reason for the Security to keep them from doing so? If not, this debate loses a lot of value because it turns into a one-sided argument instead of an interesting moral Dichotomy.Packie_J said:Well, I wouldn't exactly call it pointless. From what I understand, They're just trying to get in contact with the outside world because the "Ark" is running out of resources and the Security are struggling to maintain peace on the island.GrizzlerBorno said:I don't think I'll be getting the game (too MP centric), but if you are trying to gauge people's philosophical leanings from their chosen side, then I go with "Security".
I don't know the details of the story yet, but the other guys seem to be portrayed as "Anarchists" by a different name. I value Forced Stability over pointless Freedom.
Ot: Security. Fighting the good fight.![]()
Also, Welcome to the Escapist.
Oh, and glad to be here.