andrewfox said:
Most responses to bullies seem to be running away from the problem or shirking off the responsibility of the problem to a third party, RATHER then dealing with the issue yourself.
Maybe I'm old school, but in life, you can't wait for someone else to rescue you from your problems.
As someone who "survived" bullying, I feel there are some things that many don't quite get. Now, yes, there were times I "fixed" the problem by standing up for myself -- that is, by fighting back -- but the problem is this is not a universal solution. In fact, it
rarely does a damn thing to stop the bullying.
Calling on kids to "stand up for themselves" makes several incorrect and dangerous assumptions. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is equal, such that each victim has the ability to stand up to each bully. Secondly, it assumes that fights are fair. Thirdly, it assumes that fights are final.
Bullying is different from kids fighting, arguing, or making fun of one another. Bullying is specifically targeted, and true bullies choose their victims quite carefully to
avoid the possibility of the victim fighting back.
1. The victim is usually smaller, weaker, or otherwise physically disadvantaged. Sure, you can "fight back," but it likely will not end well. It doesn't matter how black your belt is, if someone has 60 pounds on you, you're going to get worse than you give unless they're just
abysmally bad at fighting... which brings us to:
2. The bully is usually far more experienced in fighting. A lot of times, they come from backgrounds in which fighting is the norm -- and experience
matters. Asking most kids to stand up to a bully is like asking a fish to fight on land. You're out of your element, and
you're in his.
3. The victim is usually already socially outcast. That's what makes for a "safe" victim. If they don't have friends, no one is there to come to their rescue. This greatly increases the likelihood that any fights are going to, numerically, tip toward the bully (who nearly always has a "pack").
Basically, the bully has carefully selected a victim specifically to avoid any semblance of a fair fight. They've got the home court advantage, they have numbers on their side, and they're just plain bigger and stronger in nearly every case. The victim's only hope is, in a nutshell, to either avoid the situation, or make sure they've got someone bigger (ie, adults) watching out for them. It's foolishness to tell the victims to fight on the bully's terms.