andrewfox said:
Pandalisk said:
Phoebe Prince couldn't "Deal with it" but she didn't tell anyone and took her own life.
Why should anyone being hard done have to just "deal with it" and the people who are described as "Just dealing with it" are often the ones who commit suicide.
Telling a teacher is standing up for yourself, just not in a way your familiar with, in fact actually telling someone about it is a bravery in its self because its a very sensitive issue. So much bullying goes on because most students are under the impression that nobody cares, that it doesn't matter, or that they should "just deal with it" especially males which is why Irish males between 18-24 Have the highest suicide rate in the country
If the media does anything with its huge pumping out of bullying material i hope its at least the students become more open with telling someone about their problems and people, especially teachers, become more sensitive to the issue rather than sweeping it under the rug.
This whole concept of machismo in the face of a bulling is outdated and when the idea is shared by the elders who the young rely on it the concept perpetuates
I should probably say that when I mean "dealing with it" I don't mean just let it happen or not take action.
It seems that in media, emphasis is put on the idea that it is the SCHOOL's responsibility to fix the problem. This seems odd seeing as how parents SHOULD be the ones teaching their children about the the ways to solve bullying.
Who would you rather do it? The student? I've tried that. You punch out those pricks, even if they assault you first, and you can be looking at suspension, especially if they lie about the incident. They do. Every time. I've tried violence-it doesn't work for small children unless you're bigger and faster than the guy picking on you, it doesn't work in high school, because you get in strife for it, and it doesn't stop the harrassment. Some people have characteristics that make them targets. It's a shame, but telling people they can't be the way they are, and have to deal with it is fucking bullshit. It's not on gay kids to stop being gay, or sensitive kids to stop being sensitive. It's on the others not to assault them or systematically abuse them. Fuck freedom. Your freedom to extend your fist ends at my nose.
And if you're outnumbered, good fucking luck. Now you have to be able to fight off any configuration of people who would attack you. If it's a social thing, you've got a much smaller group of people who don't interact with those who antagonise you. People don't feel bullied because they have a good social structure, or a physically capable. They feel a power disparity that favours the abuser. That's the problem.
The parent? I've had my parent suggest running over the wankers in the parking lot.
So, instead, the idea that schools would do something to prevent the institutionalisation of anti-social behaviour, doesn't seem so far fetched? We have a justice system because individuals who are wronged cannot be trusted to deal out proportionate force, and because judgement should be made from a position of authority, where the judgement may be carried out (Good luck "Dealing with it" if you're a tiny guy, or an obese guy.), and where the judgement can be more consistent.
Schools mandate the grouping of large groups of emotionally insecure individuals, without the protections of a workplace (There are laws against harrassment in the workplace which people fall back on). They should have to deal with the consequences of that, because if they can't, they're innadequate. Simple as that.
People say that bullying is common outside of schools. Bull-shit. I question the bullying experience of these people. Children can be cruel, and the wide variety of people crammed into a school makes for conflict. Outside of school, you rarely have to put up with it. The jerks are looked down on as Jersey Shore wannabes, and mocked, you generally work with a smaller group of people, meaning that people generally get along better (It's hard trying to create a social hierachy and exclude people when you've only got 5 people you work with regularly). That knife situation? Bullies aren't just sociopaths and criminals. And you're not existing at the whim of muggers.
Also, a nit pick at the silliest part of the sentiment: Ways to deal with it:
1) Resort to their tactics, violence, or abuse.
Rarely works, and can cause you trouble.
2) Ignore it.
Causes emotional trauma. Leaves all the problems to the victim, whilst the bully get his fun. Horrible solution.
3) Report it to an authority.
Since you don't feel you're an authority, you need a higher one. If you've got the power, use it, and you'll be fine (Teachers getting bullied by children get far less of my respect. They have the power to deal with these kids, and that's their job).
Reporting it to a parent doesn't help-they have nothing to teach you, and it's a crime if they try to solve the problem.
Reporting it to the school that mandates your attendance, with criminalisation of non-attendance, to solve the problem with their trained counsellors, authority to suspend and punish students, who's staff have a minimum of basic psychology training, can work. It doesn't always, and the system is in badly need of reform (Held back by attitudes informed by the Karate Kid which we see on display here), but it's the best solution.
So even if you say the student should deal with it, their best option is to
TALK TO THE SCHOOL. Fuck the victim blame. Some of us could deal with it, with a knife to their gut. But we're not sociopaths, and we expect basic consideration. If you want a free for all, bereft of any rules at all, I'm game. But what you're advocating isn't a free for all, it's a system where the bullies aren't constrained by the rules, and the victims are, and then you place the responsibility on the victim. Gee whillickers, isn't that a
clever suggestion.