Annnnd here's another due who either does not do his research right or simply doesn't care. If he wants to put warning labels on games he might as well knock himself out, but he tripped and hit his head right at the start with this label: "WARNING: Exposure to violent video games has been linked to aggressive behavior."
No, it has not. If by "linked" you mean "Me and some other dudes from much before you were born think these new fangled thingamajigs are all wrong", sure, but no studies have so far proved that violent games cause agressive behavior on anyone. It has proved said games make people somewhat agitated, but then again, so do violent movies, heavy traffic, noisy neighbors, and jerks insulting the media that you love by putting redundant labels on them.
Another thing is, there are ALREADY labels saying which games are and are not ok for kids. So he thinks even games rated E for Everyone are harzadous? What, is Mario's constant ingestion of murshrooms leading kids to do drugs? Is Rayman's missing limbs implanting the idea that kids should saw their arms and legs off? Is Banjo-Kazooie telling them that slavery is ok? ME THINKS NOT, SIR.