Hey, we get mad too. It actually happens sometimes. It just takes a lot longer to make us drop the polite veneer and break your nose with a hockey stick.
There are a lot of smaller ISPs that offer unlimited bandwidth for fairly cheap, though the speeds are typically lower than capped service from the bigger ISPs. What this decision essentially does is tell the smaller ISPs they can't do that anymore and have to offer capped service with overage charges once a rather low bandwidth cap is exceeded. This kinda ruins the competitive market because it means there's less incentive to go with a smaller ISP since they're now stuck offering essentially the same service as the larger ISPs. I could probably go on, but a lot has already been said elsewhere and I'd encourage you to look for it yourself if you're so inclined.yesjam said:I'm a Canadian customer of Bell Canada...and seriously people, it's been this way for a long time - I'm not sure when usage caps were first implemented but about 7 months ago, I was charged extra for internet usage and was told it was because I went over my monthly limit. Since then I've paid an extra few bucks a month to get an extra 60 GB of usage.
If you haven't come across this before, it's probably because you haven't had to worry about it.
It's a matter of preference, honestly. I would rather have unlimited bandwidth and be able to download as much data as I could possibly want, and maybe have to wait a little while longer to get it because of lower download speeds. With the amount of data I've downloaded in a month on numerous occasions, I'd have paid through my nose with low bandwidth caps and excessive overage charges.squid5580 said:I dunno for me it has always been a choice. Either I go with the companies that have caps (Rogers and Bell) that yeah I have to pay like 15 bucks more to have my cap doubled. Or I go with the company that has unlimited but the internet is so fucking slow I couldn't use much more than the basic limit.
I personally enjoy not having to wait an hour to download a freakin small arcade game on my 360. Or being able to play online with the proper framerate.
I know right? Canada was my backup plan.mad825 said:If there would ever be one thing preventing me from wanting to live in Canada, It would be this.
Good I echo this man's statement; the more people that e-mail their MPs, the more they will realize that this is an issue. Don't just ***** on this site, e-mail your MPs.Vivace-Vivian said:Instead of bitching about it on here people in Canada should be going to their MPs about it. Getting angry on forums won't solve a thing... A quick email will help flood their inboxes. At least, that's what I did.
I am already on a system like that. I am with Accesscomm and they have a cap on their plans. Thing is they don't charge overages, they just "raid-shape" your connection until you get back below the cap. The problem I have is that they might very well charge me overages because of their point system. With Accesscomm, if you download or upload anything between 3 pm and 12:59 pm you get dinged 2x rates. Because it is Primetime. What this means is that when I watch an HD video on Netflix (which is very new to me). I am getting dinged 2 GB for a 1 GB download. That's not including any data that might have been uploaded. That and with all the digital content I have through steam, the chances of reaching the overage is to great. I've went over it a few times already in fact, and that was with observations.squid5580 said:When I first heard about it I was pissed but misinformed. I was under the impression they were going to charge you for the GB. But if they are just capping us and charging us for overages I don't see the problem (especially since I have been capped like that for quite a while now). It shouldn't be that hard for anyone to check their usage. I do it daily and it takes me a few seconds. I also am notified when I reach a certain % of my limit so I shouldn't get a surprise with my bill.Waif said:There is a lot of talk in my area of Canada about how this will affect our billing rates. I am concerned that my own ISP will mandate these cap changes, which will most certainly disappoint me. I, however, dislike usage based billing in general, and it can lead to a great deal many abuses to the customer.
I can only hope that my fellow Canadians will think in similar ways.
I wonder what's more annoying, these caps or moron americans who still think "canada is cold" jokes are still funny.YouEatLard said:I'm not sure what is worse, that people actually live in Canada or that they think they should be allowed unlimited to access the internet.
I'm joking of course.
So how would Canadians go about fighting this? They don't have a military to speak of to fight it. You really can't boycott your ISP as then they don't have Escapist access. I don't know that Canadians are capable of rioting.
Again... I'm joking.
I'm damn happy I don't live in our 51st state. This internet cap thing would really get under my skin.
I'm probably atleast partially joking there. I haven't decided.
I dunno I think that if you use alot that you should be expected to pay a bit more. Sure $2.50 a gb for overages up to 60 bucks is extreme without a doubt (that is my Bell plan). But a simple phone call and I had my bandwidth doubled for $15 bucks. To me it seems like Hydro. I mean you use it you pay for it. You don't use it and you don't. To me it seems like they are just saying use it a bit more responsibly. Make sure you want that movie or music before you download it. Don't leave JTV up when you go for a coffee.karashata said:There are a lot of smaller ISPs that offer unlimited bandwidth for fairly cheap, though the speeds are typically lower than capped service from the bigger ISPs. What this decision essentially does is tell the smaller ISPs they can't do that anymore and have to offer capped service with overage charges once a rather low bandwidth cap is exceeded. This kinda ruins the competitive market because it means there's less incentive to go with a smaller ISP since they're now stuck offering essentially the same service as the larger ISPs. I could probably go on, but a lot has already been said elsewhere and I'd encourage you to look for it yourself if you're so inclined.yesjam said:I'm a Canadian customer of Bell Canada...and seriously people, it's been this way for a long time - I'm not sure when usage caps were first implemented but about 7 months ago, I was charged extra for internet usage and was told it was because I went over my monthly limit. Since then I've paid an extra few bucks a month to get an extra 60 GB of usage.
If you haven't come across this before, it's probably because you haven't had to worry about it.
It's a matter of preference, honestly. I would rather have unlimited bandwidth and be able to download as much data as I could possibly want, and maybe have to wait a little while longer to get it because of lower download speeds. With the amount of data I've downloaded in a month on numerous occasions, I'd have paid through my nose with low bandwidth caps and excessive overage charges.squid5580 said:I dunno for me it has always been a choice. Either I go with the companies that have caps (Rogers and Bell) that yeah I have to pay like 15 bucks more to have my cap doubled. Or I go with the company that has unlimited but the internet is so fucking slow I couldn't use much more than the basic limit.
I personally enjoy not having to wait an hour to download a freakin small arcade game on my 360. Or being able to play online with the proper framerate.
2 TB?! I fear phone calls from my ISP when I get to 50 GB (they never did object, though). How did you even manage that just from Steam?Citizen Snips said:Is that similar to cell phone usage limits in the US? I know when AT&T capped all new users it looked like world war 3 was going to begin around my campus. I don't believe I have internet caps on my plan, but they did cut my service down to 300 mbs after a 2TB downloading spree I had at Christmas. I don't think their is an actual limit on what I can download though. It just limited the speed at which it downloaded. On a side not... Damn you Steam Christmas Sale!
Well, we still have Sealand...The_root_of_all_evil said:Can we have one country left?
Australia has the Firewall, Canada has the Watchdogs, UK has the CyberWar, US has the Game bannings...where else do we have?
Not unless we can move GAMETRADERS ROBINA across...z3rostr1fe said:Well, we still have Sealand...The_root_of_all_evil said:Can we have one country left?
Australia has the Firewall, Canada has the Watchdogs, UK has the CyberWar, US has the Game bannings...where else do we have?