Characters you hate that everyone loves

Recommended Videos

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,783
0
41
Strazdas said:
Mikeyfell said:
Rob Stark: Just kill Jiame Lannister! Seriously just kill him! keeping him alive serves you no purpose! Oh, great you're going to let your mom kidnap him and set him free? Great! Way to wear the pants *****.

Daenerys: I heard that in the book she's 13 years old, which would make her character amazing. But in the HBO version she's 26 which makes her seem... um, mentally...slow, because she still acts like an emotional teenager
Just going along with what ever her big brother says, asking a prostitute to teach her how to manipulate men, going mad with power. Wild mood swings between insincere benevolence and ruthless petty revenge. Slinging threats at literally the only people standing between her and starving to death. Which would all make sense for a stupid teenager, but as an adult, she's just stupid.[/spoiler]
@Rob Stark.
He wanted to kill him. he was talked into leaving him alive because as long as they hold him hostage Lanisters will not date to kill Sansa and Arya (they think Lanisters got her, they dont know she escaped). I think thats a faily compelling argument that kept him alive.

@Daenerys.
I agree that the way she was portrayed in the show is not the best, but yes in the book she is 13 years old and that does explain A LOT. as you know in television kids are always palyed by 20s because of a tremendeous legal problems with needing kid actors (the parents must always be nearby and give permission for example). Also try to tell a 13 year old act out Daenerys sex scene.... yeah.... She is lost in the books and evne tohugh she pretends to be "As strong as dragons" shes just a kid inside and veri naive. I do liek her character though, although its not my favourite one (that would be Jon Snow or Sam).
About Rob: Kill him! Don't announce to the world that you have! How hard is it to lie about that?
(Is it hypocritical that I can hate Rob for not killing Jiame, but have Jiame be one of my favorite characters? Because I don't think so._

about Daenerys: the difficulties of casting a kid should have been considered because of how much it effects the over all quality of the show. and there are numerous ways to shoot "around" a sex scene.
Like a wide shot with crying and grunting. or a REALLY wide shot with lots of implied crying and grunting.

It could have worked. But I'm pretty sure they just wanted to show tits.
 

Sigma Castell

Elite Member
Sep 10, 2011
2,701
0
41
Ned and Rob Stark: Pretentious, hypocritical dickbags whose 'honor' which they judged others so harshly by is more of an easily-ignored guideline for them.

Sherlock: Hes a douchebag. no that is literally it. He doesn't have a single redeeming character trait. He's horrible to Sally and Anderson for literally no reason.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
vv85 said:
Wolverine

Batman

I'd rather my superheros have some flaws.
EL-OH-EL.

Sigma Castell said:
Sherlock: Hes a douchebag. no that is literally it. He doesn't have a single redeeming character trait. He's horrible to Sally and Anderson for literally no reason.
They're dicks to him too.

Maeta said:
David Brent from UK's version of The Office for being unfunny,
Uh, that's kinda the point.

Gameguy20100 said:
Gordon Freeman from half life.
He's not a character. He has a name and a very basic history because the player and other characters all need a point of contextual reference. Oh, and Mass Effect is not a first-person shooter. Immersion and what you expect from it works differently.

You just have to remember this: when people vote Gordon Freeman to the top of best character lists, they're either taking the piss out of you or they're voting for him not because he's a great character (because he isn't a character) but because he's the most iconic icon to them.

OT: I don't hate her but Clementine ain't that fucking great. Same goes for John Marston - it's like they had two people writing him who would alternate days and never interact.
 

SouthernStar

New member
Jul 23, 2013
55
0
0
Spongebob little yellow dickhead always harassing the shit out of squidward gawd how I'd like to burn his house down with him inside it.
 

Ambient

New member
Nov 19, 2009
109
0
0
Ema Skye from Phoenix Wright. Seriously it's like somebody went out of their way to tell her false information as a joke and never got around to her they were kidding.
I can't even finish the part of the game she's in because nearly every single thing she says in headache inducing.
 

LAGG

New member
Jun 23, 2011
281
0
0
Pretty much every player character in every FPS that don't keep their mouth shut. Everytime they say anything it's only for breaking immersion in the game and sometimes very retarted talks.
 

waj9876

New member
Jan 14, 2012
600
0
0
Akane from Ranma1/2. I just...I fucking hate this *****. She's just kind of...there. She never improves in her fighting abilities outside of one chapter only power-ups. Her entire character can be summed up as "extremely violent and insecure, and we have to be told she's a nice person constantly by other characters." Actively hitting people who annoy her with the power to crush stone. And she only seems to exist to be kidnapped, and side with the villains over the main character. And she's the main character's love interest.

Kagome from Inuyasha. I...don't like Inuyasha anymore. I like the character Inuyasha just fine, surprisingly, it's just how the story revolves around Kagome that kills it for me. She's a Mary Sue.

The Cerpenter family in The Dresden Files. Outside of Michael. He's cool. I just...don't like any of them, I guess. The mother just seems to hate everything outside of when something can help her, two of her children are just...there. And Molly...becomes kind of a ***** after a certain event on a boat that I won't spoil.

This one isn't exactly "hate" as more I don't really have much an opinion on. Luna from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. I much preferred Nightmare Moon as a character, in the two episodes we saw her in. I have nothing against the character, it's just that...we don't really know anything about her. Fans of her usually aren't fans of her, more than they are fans of their fanon version of her.

I didn't really like Pearl in Phoenix Wright all too much. It's less hate though. More...general dislike.
 

Not Matt

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2011
554
0
21
K-9 from doctor who. The sound of his voice alone makes me want to hurl my TV out the window and pay some hobbos to stand and stomp on it for the next 48 hours

Boba fett from star wars. He does absolutely nothing actually interesting and has the weakest cinematic death ever

Batman from..... You'll figure that out on your own. I didn't start out hating him, I Fucking loved him. But what the batman franchise has become is down right embarrassing and stupid
 

Mocmocman

New member
Dec 4, 2012
277
0
0
SouthernStar said:
Spongebob little yellow dickhead always harassing the shit out of squidward gawd how I'd like to burn his house down with him inside it.
Dude... you took my answer. Like, reason and everything.

Other than Spongebob I don't have any character whom I really "hate". I dislike a lot of characters who's character traits are "Zany", but because they are they are given what amounts to super powers, which everyone accepts because they are so "Cu-Ray-Zee".
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
Mikeyfell said:
About Rob: Kill him! Don't announce to the world that you have! How hard is it to lie about that?
(Is it hypocritical that I can hate Rob for not killing Jiame, but have Jiame be one of my favorite characters? Because I don't think so._

about Daenerys: the difficulties of casting a kid should have been considered because of how much it effects the over all quality of the show. and there are numerous ways to shoot "around" a sex scene.
Like a wide shot with crying and grunting. or a REALLY wide shot with lots of implied crying and grunting.

It could have worked. But I'm pretty sure they just wanted to show tits.
Because in war there are no spies and somone as important as Jiame wouldnt be spotted missing. riiiight.
HBO has never "Shot around" anything in source material. They dont even have control, Martin kinda does what he pleases with the show. GOT was never shy of its sex scenes. and sex scene is only one problem of a myriad of problems with casting a child actor in a seriuos show. and GOTY takes itself extremely seriuos.

Well if we were to consdier the ages, then we would be without the show to begin with, since pretty much all main characters are bellow 18. well not all of course, but for example ROB is what 15 if i remember correctly. there is a reason they treat him as a kid when he first tries to start the war.

HBO did the traditional thing, added 10 years to the character when considering casting.
 

Wickatricka

New member
Aug 26, 2011
343
0
0
Ah Johnny from ed edd and eddy. Annoying little twat and I can never get that sound out of my head from the episode where he cracks his fingers really loud and I'm now convinced that's why I want to kill anyone who does that around me.
 

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,783
0
41
Strazdas said:
Because in war there are no spies and somone as important as Jiame wouldnt be spotted missing. riiiight.
That's another thing. It's dumb that Rob keeps Jiame out in the open like that. And that he takes so many prisoners, and gives them all medical attention. He's got that same misguided altruism that got his father killed


HBO has never "Shot around" anything in source material.
Except for all the sex scenes. Considering all the rape that happens in the books and there are only 2 full frontal nude scenes in the first two seasons...
They shoot around a lot of nudity, They make up for it in gore (Which is a weird American thing, but still)

They dont even have control, Martin kinda does what he pleases with the show. GOT was never shy of its sex scenes. and sex scene is only one problem of a myriad of problems with casting a child actor in a seriuos show. and GOTY takes itself extremely seriuos.

Well if we were to consdier the ages, then we would be without the show to begin with, since pretty much all main characters are bellow 18. well not all of course, but for example ROB is what 15 if i remember correctly. there is a reason they treat him as a kid when he first tries to start the war.

HBO did the traditional thing, added 10 years to the character when considering casting.
When the actual quality of the show takes such a hit from poor casting decisions. They've changed Game of Thrones from (What I'm assuming, because I've never read the books) a story about kids being thrust into overwhelming situations because of some stupid struggle over some big metal chair nobody cares about. into a show about stupid emotional adults with no sense of priority in a harsh and unforgiving world and it just makes you wonder what the hell happened to natural selection in Winterfell.

If they NEED to artificially age the characters 10 years (For the sake of boobs) then they need to write them 10 years older. 10 years is a LONG TIME!!!!!! and 10 years in pseudo-mideveal times might as well be 100.

Winterfell seems like the kind of place where if you life past 20 you're the smartest, the strongest or the luckiest person in the world. Or at least that you had the sense to not get eaten by a direwolf.

With all these characters being 15, 13, 10 How ever old Aria and Joffery are supposed to be. still living under their parents roofs it makes sense for them to be stupid and emotional because they don't know what a difficult life is. Adults would understand that sometimes people get them selves killed.

a Daenerys who had 26 years to sit and listen to her brother plan to sell her to the Dothraki would have told him to fuck off.
A 25 year old Rob Stark went to kings landing, and apologized for his fathers brashness in hopes of getting his sisters back. Because by that point he would have enough experience to understand his father's weakness for doing the "Right" thing.


These are teenagers being played by adults, and the way that looks from the outside is that these are adults that act like teenagers. And that doesn't work in a serious show. Fans of the books can overlook it, but for someone like me it looks like George R. R. Martin loves writing stupid characters.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
Mikeyfell said:
That's another thing. It's dumb that Rob keeps Jiame out in the open like that. And that he takes so many prisoners, and gives them all medical attention. He's got that same misguided altruism that got his father killed
i agree with this.

Except for all the sex scenes. Considering all the rape that happens in the books and there are only 2 full frontal nude scenes in the first two seasons...
They shoot around a lot of nudity, They make up for it in gore (Which is a weird American thing, but still)
Rape? I dont remember any rape in the books. I mean unless you count the Dathraki pilaging the city they conquered, then yes, there is a scene in the book where Daenerys is walking down the street and sees women beign raped. It seems to ahve been cut and went straight for Daenerys talking to Drago. before that the weddign ceremony rapes were shown in the show.

When the actual quality of the show takes such a hit from poor casting decisions.
I agree, however i can udnerstand such decisions as working with real age actors would simply be impossible for current television.

They've changed Game of Thrones from (What I'm assuming, because I've never read the books) a story about kids being thrust into overwhelming situations because of some stupid struggle over some big metal chair nobody cares about. into a show about stupid emotional adults with no sense of priority in a harsh and unforgiving world and it just makes you wonder what the hell happened to natural selection in Winterfell.
so you assume (imagine) what happened in the books, compare the show to your imagination, and declare that show is inferior. okay.... >.> <.<

If they NEED to artificially age the characters 10 years (For the sake of boobs) then they need to write them 10 years older. 10 years is a LONG TIME!!!!!! and 10 years in pseudo-mideveal times might as well be 100.
They needed to artificialy age characters 10 years due to stupid censorship limitations of modern cinema. if you want to blame anyone - blame them.

Winterfell seems like the kind of place where if you life past 20 you're the smartest, the strongest or the luckiest person in the world. Or at least that you had the sense to not get eaten by a direwolf.
I do not know how smart you are, so i cannot declare this false, but Winterfell was simply a medieval town, not full of geniuses as some may seem to wish, that shows realistic (read: flawed and stupid) people.

With all these characters being 15, 13, 10 How ever old Aria and Joffery are supposed to be. still living under their parents roofs it makes sense for them to be stupid and emotional because they don't know what a difficult life is. Adults would understand that sometimes people get them selves killed.
so your claiming no adult ever acts stupidly, makes wrong decisions based on their emotions?

a Daenerys who had 26 years to sit and listen to her brother plan to sell her to the Dothraki would have told him to fuck off.
You are aware that in real life 26 year olds DO get sold for marriage even in current world, let alone in paternal rule of middle ages. In many cases the women does not even consider telling him to fuck off as an option. and neither did daenerys back then - she was a child, even if she was in a adult body.

A 25 year old Rob Stark went to kings landing, and apologized for his fathers brashness in hopes of getting his sisters back.
So if i were to murder your father for beign the only one non-corrupt in the council, kidnap your sisters, you would come and apologize to me?

Because by that point he would have enough experience to understand his father's weakness for doing the "Right" thing.
and thats why he deserved to be beheaded in a humiliating way? really?
 

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,783
0
41
Strazdas said:
Except for all the sex scenes. Considering all the rape that happens in the books and there are only 2 full frontal nude scenes in the first two seasons...
They shoot around a lot of nudity, They make up for it in gore (Which is a weird American thing, but still)
Rape? I dont remember any rape in the books. I mean unless you count the Dathraki pilaging the city they conquered, then yes, there is a scene in the book where Daenerys is walking down the street and sees women beign raped. It seems to ahve been cut and went straight for Daenerys talking to Drago. before that the weddign ceremony rapes were shown in the show.
I don't know first hand, but I was told there was a lot more rape in the books than in the show. It might have been the Dothraki part.

When the actual quality of the show takes such a hit from poor casting decisions.
I agree, however i can udnerstand such decisions as working with real age actors would simply be impossible for current television.
Yeah, kind of hard to do 5 seasons worth of principle photography before a kid gets a growth spurt

They've changed Game of Thrones from (What I'm assuming, because I've never read the books) a story about kids being thrust into overwhelming situations because of some stupid struggle over some big metal chair nobody cares about. into a show about stupid emotional adults with no sense of priority in a harsh and unforgiving world and it just makes you wonder what the hell happened to natural selection in Winterfell.
so you assume (imagine) what happened in the books, compare the show to your imagination, and declare that show is inferior. okay.... >.> <.<
uh hu... but was I wrong?
If the characters in the books were adults would you have liked the books as much?
I should read the books before I compare anything to them, but a hypothetical version of Game of Thrones that is exactly the same as the HBO show except the characters were all their intended ages would be leagues better.




With all these characters being 15, 13, 10 How ever old Aria and Joffery are supposed to be. still living under their parents roofs it makes sense for them to be stupid and emotional because they don't know what a difficult life is. Adults would understand that sometimes people get them selves killed.
so your claiming no adult ever acts stupidly, makes wrong decisions based on their emotions?
No... but teenagers make worse decisions. How much have you matured in 10 years? I'll say it again. 10 years is a long time. Given that that's how those characters would have reacted 10 years ago it seems irrational that they'd have the same reaction at their adjusted ages. And especially in the teenage years. I doubt 15 year old Rob would act similarly to 16 year old Rob.

And in a setting like Westeros, I would say that making a rash emotionally based decision would be enough to get you killed.

a Daenerys who had 26 years to sit and listen to her brother plan to sell her to the Dothraki would have told him to fuck off.
You are aware that in real life 26 year olds DO get sold for marriage even in current world, let alone in paternal rule of middle ages. In many cases the women does not even consider telling him to fuck off as an option. and neither did daenerys back then - she was a child, even if she was in a adult body.
You are aware that not all women are Daenerys Targaryen. And I really have no idea how she'd react if she'd spent 13 extra years putting up with her brother's shit. She could have been abused and broken down to the point she had no will of her own. Then I doubt Kal Drogo would have even wanted her. He could have a younger more spirited slave for much cheaper. She could have gone mad with bottled up rage towards her brother, snapped and killed him. Robert Baratheon might have just had her killed in that time. She might have been psychologically scarred so that she would be the exact same nervous 13 year old for the rest of her life, but I doubt getting raped a couple of times would have set her on the kind of power-trip she needed to decide to walk into a flaming funeral pier holding Dragon eggs.
Hell, Robert Baratheon could have died, Joffery could have been found out as a bastard and killed Stannis could have had a heart attack and an entirely new line of kings could have started and given the two remaining Targaryens a full pardon.
13 years is a LONG TIME!

Her actions make sense for a 13 year old. In the book (I'm assuming) She's an extremely well written character. As an adult, not so much.

A 25 year old Rob Stark went to kings landing, and apologized for his fathers brashness in hopes of getting his sisters back.
So if i were to murder your father for beign the only one non-corrupt in the council, kidnap your sisters, you would come and apologize to me?
If you were the king.
And the thing you actually killed my father for was treason. Like, threatening your claim to the throne by calling you a bastard.
Then yes. I would pledge fealty to you and beg you to let my sisters return home.

I feel like that course of action would be the most likely to get my sisters back.
If I was 15 I would probably want to chop your head off. So I'd gather 20,000 northerners, throw caution to the wind, and attack the bulk of the royal army.

Because by that point he would have enough experience to understand his father's weakness for doing the "Right" thing.
and thats why he deserved to be beheaded in a humiliating way? really?
Well, you don't call the king a bastard unless you're able to defend your self.
That's staging a coup 101.
Even for all the incest that went on Joffery was still beset the throne, and the king doesn't need a reason to chop your head off, the last thing you want to do is give him one. (Especially not a spoiled prick like Joffery)

Did he deserve it? Well I personally don't like the character, the only thing he did right was sire Aria and Jon. He definitely set his own self up for the pike. I think Joffery was acting rationally when he had him beheaded.
 

McMarbles

New member
May 7, 2009
1,564
0
0
The Great JT said:
Getting really sick of Batman. Everyone loves him, I know, but I've had more than enough of the guy.

More Green Lantern, though, please! Just...no Ryan Reynolds. He sucks too.
*applause* Batman has gotten so overexposed lately. Now they're shoehorning him into Man of Steel.

I especially loathe the Nolan trilogy. I'm sick of super-realism, sick of grimdark, sick of everyone praising Ledger's performance as Greasy Unpleasant Hobo Guy, sick of how the tyrilogy's grimdark is poluting everything in DC, sick of idiots who are convinced that Batman was created in 2005 by Chris Nolan, sick of people who cut down any DC thing that ISN't Nolangrimdarkshit... and sick of waiting for Cartoon Network to put the rest of "The Brave and the Bold" on Netflix so I can marathon the whole glorious thing.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
Mikeyfell said:
uh hu... but was I wrong?
If the characters in the books were adults would you have liked the books as much?
I should read the books before I compare anything to them, but a hypothetical version of Game of Thrones that is exactly the same as the HBO show except the characters were all their intended ages would be leagues better.
So as long as there are people agreeing with you it doesn ot matter that you just pulled it out of your ass?
When readign the books, save for a few characters i didnt really care about their age. then again im the kind of person that knows there are smart teenagers and stupid adults. i guess most peopel are ignorant of this.

No... but teenagers make worse decisions.
Teenagers are often not allowed to make better decisions. becuase their teenagers. and silly adults often think they are stupid just because of that. you know, those silly adults that say stuff just like your saying.

And in a setting like Westeros, I would say that making a rash emotionally based decision would be enough to get you killed.
Spoiler: and it does. that does not mean one cnat udnerstand why he made a rash emtionally based decision.

You are aware that not all women are Daenerys Targaryen.
you are aware that not all women are Ripley and similar badasses? you do? now what was your point again?

And I really have no idea how she'd react if she'd spent 13 extra years putting up with her brother's shit.
Thats right, you dont, because she is Martins character, and not yours. He knows. he showed us. and now we know. Though admitedly book goes a bit deeper into her emotional justification, while the series dont really ahve time for inner monologue.

She could have been abused and broken down to the point she had no will of her own. Then I doubt Kal Drogo would have even wanted her.
You do realized that Kal Drogo agreed to marry her before he saw her right? And that at the begining she had no will of her own untill Kal's slave showed her how to sexually pelase Kal.

She could have gone mad with bottled up rage towards her brother, snapped and killed him. Robert Baratheon might have just had her killed in that time. She might have been psychologically scarred so that she would be the exact same nervous 13 year old for the rest of her life, but I doubt getting raped a couple of times would have set her on the kind of power-trip she needed to decide to walk into a flaming funeral pier holding Dragon eggs.
are we playing a what if game now? what if humasn had wings, then he chracters would all look silly. sorry, but this is not an argument but merely fanfiction.
And it was what the witch done to Drogo and not rapes that got her on a power-trip. She had to be strong (like a dragon) for all dathraki, since Drogo could no longer be.

If you were the king.
if i was a incest child whos mother plotted and killed the real king, then killed your father, and while at it dont even have the right to the throne.

And the thing you actually killed my father for was treason. Like, threatening your claim to the throne by calling you a bastard.
Then yes. I would pledge fealty to you and beg you to let my sisters return home.
Well i guess you would work well with the Eunich then, if you get the reference.

Well, you don't call the king a bastard unless you're able to defend your self.
That's staging a coup 101.
he has a written document from the actual king declaring him the ruler till jofrey comes of age. for all intends and purposes he was the current king. and got killed for treason. becasue the bastards bought the city guard with moneys.
Or you mean that everyone should go around with army of bodyuards becuase you never know when some lunatic with enough gold may want your head.

Did he deserve it? Well I personally don't like the character, the only thing he did right was sire Aria and Jon. He definitely set his own self up for the pike. I think Joffery was acting rationally when he had him beheaded.
he was acting rationalyl going agaisnt everyone, including his own family, that wanted to send him to the watchers, thus starting a war, for his own entertainment. nothing Joffery has done was rational.

I personally didnt like the character either, but i dont think he was stupidly depicted.
 

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,783
0
41
Strazdas said:
So as long as there are people agreeing with you it doesn ot matter that you just pulled it out of your ass?
When readign the books, save for a few characters i didnt really care about their age. then again im the kind of person that knows there are smart teenagers and stupid adults. i guess most peopel are ignorant of this.
...Oooooooooookay. Moving on.

Teenagers are often not allowed to make better decisions. becuase their teenagers. and silly adults often think they are stupid just because of that. you know, those silly adults that say stuff just like your saying.
...you... make a compelling insult. Moving on.


You are aware that not all women are Daenerys Targaryen.
you are aware that not all women are Ripley and similar badasses? you do? now what was your point again?
That 13 yearolds are fundamentally different from 26 yearolds? and that 15 yearolds are fundamentally different from 25 yearolds. and that 12 yearolds are fundamentally different from 16 yearolds.
Kind of my point for the entire comment. Characteristics that work for a character of one age don't translate over unscathed into another.

And I really have no idea how she'd react if she'd spent 13 extra years putting up with her brother's shit.
Thats right, you dont, because she is Martins character, and not yours. He knows. he showed us. and now we know. Though admitedly book goes a bit deeper into her emotional justification, while the series dont really ahve time for inner monologue.
Well, 13 year old Daenerys was Martin's character. 26 year old Daenerys is a new concoction cooked up by HBO. If I had read the book I'm pretty sure I'd like 13 yearold Daenerys a lot.

are we playing a what if game now? what if humasn had wings, then he chracters would all look silly. sorry, but this is not an argument but merely fanfiction.
And it was what the witch done to Drogo and not rapes that got her on a power-trip. She had to be strong (like a dragon) for all dathraki, since Drogo could no longer be.
We are playing a what if game right now. The exact same game that the HBO writers didn't play when someone cast Emilia Clarke as Daenerys. There is a problem with jumping characters up out of their teens and into adulthood. I mean there is. If there is one thing in this entire chain of comments that's not an opinion it's that sentence. That problem should be addressed by the writers in some way shape or form.

If you were the king.
if i was a incest child whos mother plotted and killed the real king, then killed your father, and while at it dont even have the right to the throne.
(In the book does Joffery know he's a bastard?)
Rob didn't know that. Stannis was the only person Eddard told besides Cersei.
And also who cares if he's a bastard? He's on the throne and none of his guards object. As far as anyone who stands between you and your head on a pike Joffery is the king. No amount of revenge will save Eddard, some groveling might save your sisters. To me anyway the choice is obvious.


Well i guess you would work well with the Eunich then, if you get the reference.
OOOOOOHHHHHH Burn. you got me good. And you would get all your supporters wiped out by attacking the richest most powerful family in the entire kingdom. So... Tomato tomato I suppose?

Well, you don't call the king a bastard unless you're able to defend your self.
That's staging a coup 101.
he has a written document from the actual king declaring him the ruler till jofrey comes of age. for all intends and purposes he was the current king. and got killed for treason. becasue the bastards bought the city guard with moneys.
Or you mean that everyone should go around with army of bodyuards becuase you never know when some lunatic with enough gold may want your head.
And when Cersei tore the letter up dear old Ned should have reconsidered his position on the matter if he had any inclination of keeping his head on his shoulders. Honor and integrity are hard habits to break. Eddard does act in accordance to his own common sense, which is good. I just don't like the character very much because of his stubborn moral compass.

he was acting rationalyl going agaisnt everyone, including his own family, that wanted to send him to the watchers, thus starting a war, for his own entertainment. nothing Joffery has done was rational.

I personally didnt like the character either, but i dont think he was stupidly depicted.
When you play the Game of Thrones you win, or you die.
Letting someone who undermined your claim to the throne and tried to stage a coup to put himself on the throne walk away with his head is not a way to keep the throne.

And Huh? starting a war against the people who attacked him first is for his own entertainment?
Mostly everything Joffery does is in the interest of not being dethroned. Which is rational for a young king who is a total prick.