I said that guy might be a Nazi, I'm not defending him. Both can be wrong.Sure, when the left advocates violence, it's the fault of the left. When the right advocates violence, it's the fault of leftists for pointing it out.
I said that guy might be a Nazi, I'm not defending him. Both can be wrong.Sure, when the left advocates violence, it's the fault of the left. When the right advocates violence, it's the fault of leftists for pointing it out.
Fool.RussiaGate is as much a lie as WMDs in Iraq... Where's the consequences?
There was attempts at an investigation, it was hindered at every turn by republicans, fool.That's not how that works. If you think he's an insurrectionist, you have to charge and try him as one. You just don't claim someone is a murderer without a charge and a trial. Do you not realize the massive corruption that would exist if that were how things worked? I can claim so many people are insurrectionists pretty easy. That's literally how the Nazis came to power... Where's the consequences?
Fool.There was no reason the FBI should've even investigated, there was literally no evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/schumer-epstein-senate-vote-rcna230389You do realize the democrats won't release the Epstein files either, right? Both sides have claimed they want to release said files when they are not able to. When they are able to, they will not release them because important enough people are in them and will influence either side to not release the files. It's that simple. It's like any other campaign promise made while campaigning that immediately can't be done when they actually get elected in.
Let's hope Tyler's dad is available next time the FBI needs to track someone down.View attachment 13820
A hindu telling a christian they'll meet in Valhalla is fucking hilarious.
View attachment 13821
This is nonsensical conspiratorial thinking. But even if we entertain the idea that blaming violence on your opponents is trying to justify more violence, we have that here too anyway. Just as silly as people claiming the killer in that case was a Marxist, we now have the entire internet propaganda machine spreading the idea that the killer is actually "MAGA" (edit: or an actual hit job by Trump or Republicans or Israel). And then also celebrating the death. It's still, at minimum, strictly worse.


I would like to note the difference in scope and reach of this guy's audience, being broadcast on national TV and all that, and a person's post on a dead forum with 20-odd active members.Remember everyone, you're not supposed to call for the killing of people just because you don't approve of them (also, I'm not linking to FOX so reddit is what you're getting.).
It's literally what people out there are saying: they are at war, should fight back, get retribution.This is nonsensical conspiratorial thinking.
This is just a straw man, because the point has already been made that the problem is people blaming political violence on others but refusing to accept any blame for their own.But even if we entertain the idea that blaming violence on your opponents is trying to justify more violence, we have that here too anyway.
And thus the next accountability evasion from you: "Yeah, but you're worse".Just as silly as people claiming the killer in that case was a Marxist, we now have the entire internet propaganda machine spreading the idea that the killer is actually "MAGA" (edit: or an actual hit job by Trump or Republicans or Israel). And then also celebrating the death. It's still, at minimum, strictly worse.
A right-winger said something objectionable, and your only criticism was of a left-winger for commenting on it. It's not your first rodeo with that tactic, either. Again, it's all deflection and denial of any accountability for the right, all you ever do.I said that guy might be a Nazi, I'm not defending him. Both can be wrong.
Someone bigger then basically all of them, someone many of them personally knew, was assassinated in front of a crowd of people, and their reactions aren't all perfect. You are free to condemn anyone talking about prepping for violence, even in this circumstance.It's literally what people out there are saying: they are at war, should fight back, get retribution.
Why should we not take them at their word? Why should we act like their words don't have consequences for how others think? This is the president, his advisors, multibillionaire supporters, media supporters: they're not little-league nobodies with 50 Instragram followers.
I said "that guy might be a Nazi". That's the far harsher criticism. I do not use that word casually.A right-winger said something objectionable, and your only criticism was of a left-winger for commenting on it. It's not your first rodeo with that tactic, either. Again, it's all deflection and denial of any accountability for the right, all you ever do.
If a single person was actually hurt by alligators there, those jokes aren't getting made in response.
Strictly speaking I'd suggest it's projection, not straw manning, considering we're a near-decade into alt-right groups like the proud boys and boogaloos specifically and intentionally going to major political events (protest or not), with the intent of inciting violence or committing it themselves, to either blame anyone but themselves for it or play the victim if and when they FAFO. Up to and including the latest round of anti-Trump protests as organized by various liberal political groups across the country, most notably 50501. I'd go so far as to argue that's Hegseth's and Miller's intent, directing Trump to nationalize Guardsmen in blue cities across the country -- bullbait people into pulling something against the Guard.This is just a straw man, because the point has already been made that the problem is people blaming political violence on others but refusing to accept any blame for their own.
Okay, even if we set aside the fact this facility is a concentration camp by definition -- and MAGA embraces it -- that the facility resides in a alligator-infested, disease-ridden, swamp far away from anything approaching modern infrastructure was its primary selling point. Calling it "Alligator Alcatraz" isn't a joke in response to liberal/progressive criticism, it's what they preemptively, voluntarily, chose to call it themselves -- in fact, they're not jokes at all.If a single person was actually hurt by alligators there, those jokes aren't getting made in response.
Or, crazy thought, they intend to fight crime. Direct from the mayor of DC:I'd go so far as to argue that's Hegseth's and Miller's intent, directing Trump to nationalize Guardsmen in blue cities across the country -- bullbait people into pulling something against the Guard.
That's actually completely wrong, and I was going to debunk that -- in fact I did, in the reply I deleted.Or, crazy thought, they intend to fight crime. Direct from the mayor of DC:
You're just hoping nobody noticed, and you can just quietly change the subject and move on. Nah, you don't get a pass on this one.This is nonsensical conspiratorial thinking. But even if we entertain the idea that blaming violence on your opponents is trying to justify more violence, we have that here too anyway. Just as silly as people claiming the killer in that case was a Marxist, we now have the entire internet propaganda machine spreading the idea that the killer is actually "MAGA" (edit: or an actual hit job by Trump or Republicans or Israel). And then also celebrating the death. It's still, at minimum, strictly worse.
Perhaps. But this doesn't always happen. Recall that British MP Jo Cox, who had campaigned against Brexit, was murdered by a far-right attacker in 2016. Then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson declared that the way to honour Cox would be to "get Brexit done".Just like how when I heard that Trump got shot in the ear I declared that he won, so do I feel about this situation here. I don't really care for the majority of Kirk's views but now they will be treated as sacrosanct because to criticize them will be cruel when they guy just got shot in the neck so dishonest actors will frame criticism as lack of humanity and empathy.
Right so my point is that to play in their hand by killing people from the left like this guy did is dumb. You don't need to help them in this way. You can't help if some right winger kills their own but you can at least try to stop those from the left.Perhaps. But this doesn't always happen. Recall that British MP Jo Cox, who had campaigned against Brexit, was murdered by a far-right attacker in 2016. Then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson declared that the way to honour Cox would be to "get Brexit done".
In short, the post-murder framing is often just whatever the right-wingers (or their toadies in the media) want it to be.
So...what does that have to do with this case, since the suspected shooter seems by all indications to have been a right-winger himself?Right so my point is that to play in their hand by killing people from the left like this guy did is dumb. You don't need to help them in this way. You can't help if some right winger kills their own but you can at least try to stop those from the left.
What "those from the left"?!Right so my point is that to play in their hand by killing people from the left like this guy did is dumb. You don't need to help them in this way. You can't help if some right winger kills their own but you can at least try to stop those from the left.
This is doing them already a great favour by not treating Islamism as a right wing ideology.What "those from the left"?!
![]()
