Child Must Have Thought a Gun Was a Wii Remote, Mother Says

GHMonkey

New member
Aug 11, 2009
305
0
0
thebackupfreak said:
GHMonkey said:
thebackupfreak said:
GHMonkey said:
tkioz said:
Okay I'm going to act like a bastard here, I feel sorry for the family, but honestly as a rare duck, a gun owner from childhood, and a gamer, I'm going to be blunt.

Fucking Idiots. That's it. They Are FUCKING IDIOTS. The Parents are FUCKING MORONS! Here is the rules of gun safety I learnt as a 5 year old.

1) Treat Every Firearm as if loaded, even when proven otherwise (that means don't point it at shit you moron)
2) Only aim at something you intend to shoot
3) When not using the firearm secure it safely in a locked gun cabinet of some kind, separate from the ammunition. YOU NEVER LEAVE THEM LOADED.

It's fucking simple, those are the core rules of gun safety, anyone who doesn't follow them in their own home is a fucking moron, I'm not blaming the kid, I'm blaming the stupid parents, you don't leave guns laying around you moronic twits, ever, you don't leave them loaded, ever, you don't let little kids touch them EVER.

The man should be locked away for life. fucking twit.
THANK YOU! IM NOT ALONE!!
thebackupfreak said:
How many more vulnerable people will have to die before gun controls will be tightened or even completely revoked? Speaking as a Brit, I just don't understand why this has been allowed to go on for so long. Blame may not lie with the parents, regardless of all the speculation on this thread, but with a government and a society that is too attatched to an old and outdated ideal about personal defence. Until more people in America wake up to why this problem exists, there will continue to be horrific and tragic accidents like this every day.
well since we are on the topic of generalizations. lets ban soccer while were at it since it seem that everytime there is a soccer match it britan there seems to be a riot.
Fine. It was a generalisation. But, whereas the problems behind rioting in football stadiums has been partially solved (tackling the social problems behind hooliganism, modification of policing policies, etc.), the gun problem in America has stagnated. Roughly 12000 people every year in America are killed by people with privately owned guns, working out to a little over 30 people every day. Hmm. Maybe I'm not generalising.

And really, where do you expect these people to be killed? Yes, some will be in tough inner-city districts, and yes, some will be isolated incidents with obscure details. But some will always happen in quiet little suburban neighbourhoods with tragic outcomes such as this. But what the fuck do I know? Very little evidently, but if you believe that it is a worthwhile trade-off to lose thousands of lives every year in return for the unrestricted right to own and carry a 9-millimetre semiautomatic handgun or an assault rifle, then I pity you and your backwards culture and train of thought. Oh, and tkioz, I hear that if you repeat your advice enough, then it will bring back the victims.
you are apparently unfamiliar with concealed carry laws as well purchasing laws of handguns. you cannot purchase pistols like your buying cookies. a 3 day waiting period is mandatory as well as local police and FBI background checks. not only that but you also have to register said firearms into ATF and HLS databases to be logged. your claim that thousands of lives lost to these firearms, did you take into account how many of those were illegal and smuggled. please also note the fully automatic weapons are extremely difficult to obtain, requiring permits that need to be updated yearly as well as more intensive background check required for hand guns.

hey, i also here if you get into more people faces and say shit to people like that last line, it makes you seem like less intolerant.

now i do respect your opinion in this matter as it is delicate, at least it was well put.
Yes, it was seriously uncool of me to say that, and I apologise. However, my wider point wasn't about laws on concealment and purchase (which I have to admit I'm woefully ignorant), just about it seemingly being a bad idea to be able to buy guns at all. If they are available and people buy them, it just seems like it is a foregone conclusion that people will die in unfortunate circumstances. Guns kill people, and no matter of controls on them will stop them from doing just what they are designed to do.
hey man, its all good. i can sympathize with the lack of understanding of state mandated laws if you do not live in the country it self. i can say with no doubt that my understanding of the British policies are very poor as well. the way i see it it is kind of like the chemicals people buy or knives. useful items with multiple purposes that have the potential for harm. unfortunately in modern society guns are feared which is that last thing people should be of fire arms. most firearms today, at least ones available to civilian markets are designed for either self-defense or hunting/ recreation target shooting.
 

benjimoon

New member
Sep 11, 2008
65
0
0
Murderlicous said:
Either the mother is really fucking stupid, or she trying to make herself look like a less shitty parent by saying its the game's fault. And what kind of game involves shooting yourself anyways?
pwasona 3?

*persona 3
 

Ralen-Sharr

New member
Feb 12, 2010
618
0
0
I don't even have a kid, but if I sure as hell am not going to leave my gun in a high traffic area, LOADED.

FFS some people need a serious lesson in personal responsibility.

Mistaking a gun for a Wii controller? Wouldn't that mean she'd have shot the TV?
 

santacolia

New member
Aug 5, 2009
49
0
0
Poor little baby... she wasn't going to last long in that family anyway.
Who points a wiimote at their face with no game being played? That's such a piss-poor excuse for neglecting a child. Lets hope they don't have anymore kids to kill.
 

gutterball17

New member
Jul 14, 2009
144
0
0
Xanadeas said:
Here's a question... If she thought it was a wii-mote why would she be pointing it at herself and not the TV?
That's what I thought was weird too. Plus it just amazes me how everybody thinks they can blame they're own stupidity on video games if something is even slightly related. It's almost like "I performed vehicular manslaughter but it's not my fault. It's video games for teaching me to drive aggresively and rewarding me for killing people." The only way that you could ever blame video games for your own stupidity is if you have absolutely and completely no idea how the real world works...or your Peter Griffin with amnesia.
 

gutterball17

New member
Jul 14, 2009
144
0
0
Murderlicous said:
Either the mother is really fucking stupid, or she trying to make herself look like a less shitty parent by saying its the game's fault. And what kind of game involves shooting yourself anyways?
Bioshock 2 opening is the only one I can think of, but you're not actually doing it so I guess it doesn't count. But we should make one and release it on the unsuspecting masses! Mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!
 

DaMan1500

New member
Jul 10, 2009
471
0
0
There's really no point in getting angry about this. If any human being could be dumb enough to literally allow a three-year-old to play with a loaded gun in front of them, then it's safe to say that their opinions on videogames aren't going to be winning over the hearts and minds of the public.
 

pwnzerstick

New member
Mar 25, 2009
592
0
0
I bet the dad was playing wii when he heard the noise and forgot to put the gun back because he wanted to get back to playing. It's the games fault for being fun!!!
 

kimba_lion

New member
Mar 12, 2010
222
0
0
Douk said:
We don't even know if they own a wii.

i agree plus are you that stupid to not know the difference of weights??

i mean shit guns arent that heavy but heavier than the wiimotes and the guns are guns!!

bu difference right there!
 

Insanepredator

New member
Mar 12, 2010
2
0
0
Dear Escapist,

Please remove the missleading image of the wii-zapper from your article and replace it with someting closer to the remote in question so that people will stop comming in here talking out of thier ***.

Thank you,
IP

Image of wii gun along side the real one.


angergod said:
That's Tennessee for you.
As a resident of Tennessee I can say that you are absolutely correct.
 

GeekFury

New member
Aug 20, 2009
347
0
0
Tragedy a child died, BUT! She and her family should get a Darwin Award for getting some more morons out the gene pool, I still vote for licencing of child birth or at the very least forced sterilization for people below a certian IQ or who don't have an ounce of common fucking sense.
 

SuccessAndBiscuts

New member
Nov 9, 2009
347
0
0
Insanepredator said:
Dear Escapist,

Please remove the missleading image of the wii-zapper from your article and replace it with someting closer to the remote in question so that people will stop comming in here talking out of thier ***.

Thank you,
IP

Image of wii gun along side the real one.
The escapists pic is not misleading, no more than the pic you request they change it with, as the news report does not state which type of controller it is supposed to have been.
 

Murderlicous

New member
Mar 10, 2010
20
0
0
gutterball17 said:
Murderlicous said:
Either the mother is really fucking stupid, or she trying to make herself look like a less shitty parent by saying its the game's fault. And what kind of game involves shooting yourself anyways?
Bioshock 2 opening is the only one I can think of, but you're not actually doing it so I guess it doesn't count. But we should make one and release it on the unsuspecting masses! Mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!
Agreed. But I forgot about Persona 3, my brother still hasn't let me live that one down! ^_^
 

chiefohara

New member
Sep 4, 2009
985
0
0
Lord Monocle Von Banworthy said:
chiefohara said:
Lord Monocle Von Banworthy said:
GHMonkey said:
thebackupfreak said:
GHMonkey said:
tkioz said:
Okay I'm going to act like a bastard here, I feel sorry for the family, but honestly as a rare duck, a gun owner from childhood, and a gamer, I'm going to be blunt.

Fucking Idiots. That's it. They Are FUCKING IDIOTS. The Parents are FUCKING MORONS! Here is the rules of gun safety I learnt as a 5 year old.

1) Treat Every Firearm as if loaded, even when proven otherwise (that means don't point it at shit you moron)
2) Only aim at something you intend to shoot
3) When not using the firearm secure it safely in a locked gun cabinet of some kind, separate from the ammunition. YOU NEVER LEAVE THEM LOADED.

It's fucking simple, those are the core rules of gun safety, anyone who doesn't follow them in their own home is a fucking moron, I'm not blaming the kid, I'm blaming the stupid parents, you don't leave guns laying around you moronic twits, ever, you don't leave them loaded, ever, you don't let little kids touch them EVER.

The man should be locked away for life. fucking twit.
THANK YOU! IM NOT ALONE!!
thebackupfreak said:
How many more vulnerable people will have to die before gun controls will be tightened or even completely revoked? Speaking as a Brit, I just don't understand why this has been allowed to go on for so long. Blame may not lie with the parents, regardless of all the speculation on this thread, but with a government and a society that is too attatched to an old and outdated ideal about personal defence. Until more people in America wake up to why this problem exists, there will continue to be horrific and tragic accidents like this every day.
well since we are on the topic of generalizations. lets ban soccer while were at it since it seem that everytime there is a soccer match it britan there seems to be a riot.
Fine. It was a generalisation. But, whereas the problems behind rioting in football stadiums has been partially solved (tackling the social problems behind hooliganism, modification of policing policies, etc.), the gun problem in America has stagnated. Roughly 12000 people every year in America are killed by people with privately owned guns, working out to a little over 30 people every day. Hmm. Maybe I'm not generalising.

And really, where do you expect these people to be killed? Yes, some will be in tough inner-city districts, and yes, some will be isolated incidents with obscure details. But some will always happen in quiet little suburban neighbourhoods with tragic outcomes such as this. But what the fuck do I know? Very little evidently, but if you believe that it is a worthwhile trade-off to lose thousands of lives every year in return for the unrestricted right to own and carry a 9-millimetre semiautomatic handgun or an assault rifle, then I pity you and your backwards culture and train of thought. Oh, and tkioz, I hear that if you repeat your advice enough, then it will bring back the victims.
you are apparently unfamiliar with concealed carry laws as well purchasing laws of handguns. you cannot purchase pistols like your buying cookies. a 3 day waiting period is mandatory as well as local police and FBI background checks. not only that but you also have to register said firearms into ATF and HLS databases to be logged. your claim that thousands of lives lost to these firearms, did you take into account how many of those were illegal and smuggled. please also note the fully automatic weapons are extremely difficult to obtain, requiring permits that need to be updated yearly as well as more intensive background check required for hand guns.

hey, i also here if you get into more people faces and say shit to people like that last line, it makes you seem like less intolerant.

now i do respect your opinion in this matter as it is delicate, at least it was well put.
I think you're extrapolating rules of your state as indicative of the whole. I used to be a Tennessean with 10 guns and I never waited a mandatory three days for any of them, nor are any registered. Background checks are instant in many states. The only time I ever failed to walk out of a gun store with the gun I wanted the first day was a time I wanted a different grip and had to wait for the store to order one with the option I wanted. I'm on your side here, but whenever either side of a debate puts forth inaccurate information it just leaves holes for the other side to exploit in future arguments.

And yes, anti-gun people conveniently forget that fully automatic weapons have been severely restricted since 1934. What they call "assault rifles" as we all know are called that based on purely cosmetic features that have no bearing on the machine's function.
Im another European, what i can't understand is why sensible Gun ownerships laws like in thebackupfreaks state aren't copied across the board by every other state in the US like yours in Tennesse? Surely it would be to everyone's benefit if people across the board were checked up on or given at least some rudimentary lessons in gun ownership before walking out of the store with a weapon?
Read again. I didn't say there was no background check. I said the checks were instant. They scan your fingerprints and electronically submit your identification to the FBI instantly and get a result back. If you are a convicted felon, have been adjudicated mental defective, or are under a restraining order, you will not be sold a firearm.

That lets you buy a gun that you must transport unloaded if outside of your home. As in, gun in the trunk, ammunition in the glove compartment of the car. You may not carry that gun in a usable state without a Carry Permit.

A Carry Permit requires you to take a six hour safety course and go to a range where you must qualify with a handgun. You have to prove to the instructor's satisfaction that you can hit what you're aiming at reliably. Then you take the certificate of completion to the Department of Safety and pay an additional fee to get a Permit, which you will receive by post after yet more background checking. Interestingly enough in Tennessee it is a Carry Permit, not a Concealed Carry Permit, so anywhere you can carry a concealed weapon you can carry one openly. There's a whole laundry list of places you can't carry, too, including places where alcohol is served, on state or federal property, near schools, and anywhere the owners have posted a sign stating that patrons may not come armed. Mass shootings in the United States almost without exception take place in these "gun-free" zones, and I'll let you make of that what you wish.

So, yeah, even in TN we do have all those things. The only thing I would change to be more like other states would be to require additional safety courses every couple of years and to require people to qualify with the weapon they're going to carry. For example I qualified for my permit with a .22lr match pistol but my daily carry gun was a Walther PPK in .380.
Thank you for the explanation. Sorry for not replying back to you sooner, i've been away with work.

Where i am from and where you are from are completely different in terms of our attitudes and accessabilities to firearms. Hence my curiosity, Michael Moore's bowling for columbine gave the impression that some states in the US had a fairly blasse' attitude to weapons which i would personally find pretty alarming. I know he is an exhaggerater of the highest degree, but still there is no smoke without fire i think.

I own a shotgun, and im a reservist with the army so i have a very healthy respect for weapons, and when i read about things like the above topic and how careless people are with weapons... well ... i just can't figure it out is all, you know? Handguns are illegal here, in terms of personal and home protection the best you can do is a shotgun, which to my mind is more than enough. We have little to no incidents of this nature (the thread topic) because people are largely unarmed (getting a gun is a pain in the arse, a Hurley/baseball bat is generally enough because most of our criminals aren't armed with guns, and shotguns are too cumbersome for small kids to screw around with) and the people who are armed aren't morons who leave a loaded weapon with the safety off on a table low enough for a child to pick up.

Every weapon is registered, so any discharge from that weapon can be traced back to it and although all this extra safety and security and big brother tracking aspect is a pain in the arse, im glad of it. It means more idiots are disuaded from impulse buying a gun and those that do persevere that far are forcibly educated enough to be responsible with it.

That said we aren't a gun saturated society, and ye are. Ours are two completely different sets of circumstances, and i won't presume to lecture you because i don't know how it is where you are from, but as you said yourself more safety courses would be a good thing, and people doing a course on the specific weapon they intend to carry would be another, so how come the NRA or the federal governement doesn't push this kind of attitude more? its not restricting people's rights by any means its just making them responsible. Another poster on here said how he was able to pick and choose different firearms and leave the same day with it! That just seems incredible to me, you know? I don't mind people being armed, i'd just want them competent with what they buy before they take it home.