well, this came to me in an email and I'll shorten it to just include the insult
'According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't
exist... What do you say to that, son?'
'To continue the
point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean.' The
student looks around the room.. 'Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?'
The class breaks out into laughter. 'Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain,
felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so...
So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that
you have no brain, with all due respect, sir.' 'So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust
your lectures, sir?'
'According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't
exist... What do you say to that, son?'
'To continue the
point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean.' The
student looks around the room.. 'Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?'
The class breaks out into laughter. 'Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain,
felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so...
So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that
you have no brain, with all due respect, sir.' 'So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust
your lectures, sir?'