bjj hero said:
Thank you for the link, it made for interesting reading. It explains how new species get a foot hold but I would love to see how your family tree went if you limited your procreation to sibings. You cannot keep a species going with only one pair. If you could then conservation would be easy.
Fuck wasting money on saving the Gorrillas When they go extinct well just let 2 out from the zoo. We both know the real world doesn't work that way. It further fails when you consider that the predators will eat at least half of these pairings or starve to death.
The story can't be true on many levels.
IF you could fit all of these animals and all the feed etc needed to keep them healthy on board, with enough room to exercise, keep the animals that will eat each other seperate AND there were about 50 arcs doing the same thing then maybe... just maybe. It would still be a WTF moment you'd claimed had jumped the shark if it was in a movie.
On the temper tantrum, he killed every last one of them (except noah and co) Overkill much? It was a dick move. The old testament is full of these "outbursts. Dont get me started on Lot.
You can believe what you like but if you are going to feed me crap as fact, I'll call BS. You can say that is narrow minded if you like but if you have supporting evidence I will gladly reconsider my position.
Considering according to evolution every species that has a differing number of chromosomes from another is in fact a product of "procreation to siblings" then I'd have to say it's actually gone pretty well. Since humans have 46 chromosomes and chimps have 48, our family tree is exactly what you've just described. Look in the mirror, you're a product of "procreation with siblings".
The tantrum part is really just how you "feel" about it honestly and there's no way to debate it with you. I "feel" that people getting off on DUI charges and manslaughter after hitting and killing someone and then only getting 2 years in prison is a "dick move" by the justice system. :shrug: It has nothing to do with fact or not, it's my interpretation of morality, just as this is yours.
Also, in reference to Goomba, I found some of that Grand Canyon stuff, but I'm not going to derail this thread any more then I have already.
