closed l

Recommended Videos

Azraellod

New member
Dec 23, 2008
4,375
0
0
I have no issues with suicide. I think it's sad if someone decides to go through with it, but I believe that forcing someone to stay alive when they don't want to be is truly despicable. Everyone should be able to go out on their own terms if they want to do so, and preventing that is in my eyes a violation of human rights.

By all means, if someone is suicidal, someone should be allowed to try and talk to them about it, or try and find another option, but if they have to physically stop them by holding them down or something, then that's over the line.

It helps here if I use the metaphor that life is a game of sorts. If you don't want to play because you aren't enjoying it, you shouldn't be forced to do so. True, you might enjoy playing it later on, but that shouldn't mean you have to do so, and I cant see how being forced to keep playing is enjoyable for anyone.
 

KiKiweaky

New member
Aug 29, 2008
970
0
0
Azraellod said:
I have no issues with suicide. I think it's sad if someone decides to go through with it, but I believe that forcing someone to stay alive when they don't want to be is truly despicable. Everyone should be able to go out on their own terms if they want to do so, and preventing that is in my eyes a violation of human rights.

By all means, if someone is suicidal, someone should be allowed to try and talk to them about it, or try and find another option, but if they have to physically stop them by holding them down or something, then that's over the line.

It helps here if I use the metaphor that life is a game of sorts. If you don't want to play because you aren't enjoying it, you shouldn't be forced to do so. True, you might enjoy playing it later on, but that shouldn't mean you have to do so, and I cant see how being forced to keep playing is enjoyable for anyone.
What about those that are mentally ill?

I work in a psychiatric hospital, where some people have to be watched by nurses 24 hours a day because they have lost it, and will try and kill themselves. Do you think we should just 'let them' do it?
 

Azraellod

New member
Dec 23, 2008
4,375
0
0
KiKiweaky said:
What about those that are mentally ill?

I work in a psychiatric hospital, where some people have to be watched by nurses 24 hours a day because they have lost it, and will try and kill themselves. Do you think we should just 'let them' do it?
Yes, I do.

If they want to kill themselves, then I say they should be allowed to do so. Even if their reasoning is not rational, it doesn't change the fact that they still want to die, and forcing them to live on in that situation is just cruel in my eyes.
 

Video Gone

New member
Feb 7, 2009
563
0
0
Arkhangelsk said:
I've had thoughts about it, but I've never attempted it. And if somebody really wants to do it, nobody should stop them. Of course, they are allowed to try to convince them, but they're not allowed to literally stop them.
Jim Carrey is.
He's musically allowed to stop them.
 

Shynobee

New member
Apr 16, 2009
541
0
0
I've never even come close to ever having to commit suicide. I have a great life, (in my opinion) so I really can't say what its like to be in that kind of position.

What I do know is this, don't commit suicide, because, honestly, its not nice. You seriously want other people to have to get rid of your cold, lifeless corpse? That's just mean.

And if your reason for committing suicide is because people were mean to you, don't lower yourself to their level, you are better than them.
 

superkenalmighty

New member
Mar 14, 2010
10
0
0
Azraellod said:
KiKiweaky said:
What about those that are mentally ill?

I work in a psychiatric hospital, where some people have to be watched by nurses 24 hours a day because they have lost it, and will try and kill themselves. Do you think we should just 'let them' do it?
Yes, I do.

If they want to kill themselves, then I say they should be allowed to do so. Even if their reasoning is not rational, it doesn't change the fact that they still want to die, and forcing them to live on in that situation is just cruel in my eyes.
I've had family in that situation, but they got better and regret ever thinking of suicide. They're also very thankful for the people who stopped them and got them out of that rut.

I think your opinion is based on principal rather than experience. =/
 

KiKiweaky

New member
Aug 29, 2008
970
0
0
Azraellod said:
KiKiweaky said:
What about those that are mentally ill?

I work in a psychiatric hospital, where some people have to be watched by nurses 24 hours a day because they have lost it, and will try and kill themselves. Do you think we should just 'let them' do it?
Yes, I do.

If they want to kill themselves, then I say they should be allowed to do so. Even if their reasoning is not rational, it doesn't change the fact that they still want to die, and forcing them to live on in that situation is just cruel in my eyes.
These people aren't only irrational they have totally lost it, one of them was convinced that a delivery guy was an actor from blade runner (despite the fact that the guy was in his early 20's) and was trying to get his autograph. He's now well, living, working and has even written to the building thanking the staff?

Would you still opt for letting him kill himself despite the fact that people can obviously recover? You can't cure everyone I know but surely stories like this should at least make you think giving them a chance to recover is infinitely better than letting complete their first suicide attempt.
 

Azraellod

New member
Dec 23, 2008
4,375
0
0
KiKiweaky said:
These people aren't only irrational they have totally lost it, one of them was convinced that a delivery guy was an actor from blade runner (despite the fact that the guy was in his early 20's) and was trying to get his autograph. He's now well, living, working and has even written to the building thanking the staff?

Would you still opt for letting him kill himself despite the fact that people can obviously recover? You can't cure everyone I know but surely stories like this should at least make you think giving them a chance to recover is infinitely better than letting complete their first suicide attempt.
...huh. I actually responded to the guy above you via pm about this earlier today, because I figured that now this thread was closed people weren't supposed to use it anymore, but ok then.

I'm well aware that people may regret trying to kill themselves at a later date. They may indeed recover from whatever is causing them to be like that. However, I think that forcing them to remain alive because they might recover is cruel, and makes that person suffer through forcing them to continue living when it might not even have an effect.

If it was a matter of just giving them a chance to recover, then I'd be more willing to concede here, but what sort of time period would the given recovery time be? I'm pretty sure it would most likely have to be marked down as at least five years to allow people to recover properly, and to me, that sounds like too long for the others.
 

KiKiweaky

New member
Aug 29, 2008
970
0
0
Azraellod said:
KiKiweaky said:
These people aren't only irrational they have totally lost it, one of them was convinced that a delivery guy was an actor from blade runner (despite the fact that the guy was in his early 20's) and was trying to get his autograph. He's now well, living, working and has even written to the building thanking the staff?

Would you still opt for letting him kill himself despite the fact that people can obviously recover? You can't cure everyone I know but surely stories like this should at least make you think giving them a chance to recover is infinitely better than letting complete their first suicide attempt.
...huh. I actually responded to the guy above you via pm about this earlier today, because I figured that now this thread was closed people weren't supposed to use it anymore, but ok then.

I'm well aware that people may regret trying to kill themselves at a later date. They may indeed recover from whatever is causing them to be like that. However, I think that forcing them to remain alive because they might recover is cruel, and makes that person suffer through forcing them to continue living when it might not even have an effect.

If it was a matter of just giving them a chance to recover, then I'd be more willing to concede here, but what sort of time period would the given recovery time be? I'm pretty sure it would most likely have to be marked down as at least five years to allow people to recover properly, and to me, that sounds like too long for the others.
I really don't know. Some people never truly recover and have to fight their illness their entire lives. Some can over come it while others can't.

Others can appear normal and relapse into a state of madness if they don't take their medication. One of the biggest problems with the meds they are getting is they are extremely powerful. I haven't done any research on the topic, but from talking with people some of the meds can lead to excessive weight gain. Which for many people is something they will be worried about and will cause them to stop the meds they are on.

Admittedly I have never been suicidal but I have been effected by it twice. Both on the 26th of December exactly a year apart. One of the guys who killed himself was found hanging from the rafters of in his shed by his son, so I don't see how the person committing suicide solves anything.

By relieving his own trouble, he has now passed it onto his family. In the case above his son bore the brunt of it, thankfully he was too young to remember it, I don't see how what he did is any less cruel, than him being put into hospital and at least giving his son the chance of having a father.
 

Azraellod

New member
Dec 23, 2008
4,375
0
0
KiKiweaky said:
I really don't know. Some people never truly recover and have to fight their illness their entire lives. Some can over come it while others can't.

Others can appear normal and relapse into a state of madness if they don't take their medication. One of the biggest problems with the meds they are getting is they are extremely powerful. I haven't done any research on the topic, but from talking with people some of the meds can lead to excessive weight gain. Which for many people is something they will be worried about and will cause them to stop the meds they are on.

Admittedly I have never been suicidal but I have been effected by it twice. Both on the 26th of December exactly a year apart. One of the guys who killed himself was found hanging from the rafters of in his shed by his son, so I don't see how the person committing suicide solves anything.

By relieving his own trouble, he has now passed it onto his family. In the case above his son bore the brunt of it, thankfully he was too young to remember it, I don't see how what he did is any less cruel, than him being put into hospital and at least giving his son the chance of having a father.
See, while I'm for giving people a chance to recover, it shouldn't be a long one in my view, so that those that aren't going to recover have to suffer less. But if, say, it was six months or something, then I'm pretty sure that isn't going to save a lot of those that do in fact have a chance to recover. It's horribly difficult to compromise between the two groups.

While I support someone having the right to commit suicide, I do think that there are nicer ways of going about it. For example, leaving a note explaining why they felt it was necessary, and trying to set it up so it traumatizes those close to them as little as possible. Having them just hang themselves in a shed makes me think this person hadn't really thought about these things.

Now while I'm for giving people a choice in suicide, I do think it's something they should think about carefully before trying[footnote]obviously for those that have irrational reasons for it, this isn't always possible[/footnote].

I'm not going to deny that suicide isn't sometimes selfish act, passing off the problems onto those around them, but I think I'd rather have someone close to me die, then have them keep on living when they don't want to just so I wouldn't suffer.

(Sorry if that sounded insensitive by the way, it's just how I'd look at it.)

EDIT: Conversation has been moved to pm.