Cloud's On The Horizon
- Thread starter Logan Westbrook
- Start date
Well, if you want to get a copy of those games, all it'll really take is a few searches on Amazon. I find new copies of the US version for 8 and 9 for under $20 on the US site, and while you live in the UK, the UK site for Amazon has a copies of 7, 8, and 9 for what looks between 20-30 pounds each.Trivun said:
Now, I'm not sure what the conversion rates between the Dollars and Pounds is, so I'll have to leave it up to you to figure out if it's worth it or not.
Final Fantasy III for the DS was completely remade. This is most likely just going to be the PS1 version of VII distributed on the PSN as PSone Classic, considering that's how you (legally) play PS1 games on BOTH the PS3 and PSP. So chances aren't that great.Vanguard1219 said:
Now, if they had just mentioned the PSP, then there could've been the chance, like with the PSP Port of Final Fantasy Tactics.
excellent, i may finally axctually finish it!!!
we moved house midway through me playing it and it got lost in the move, lacking the funds to replace it i never completed it.
we moved house midway through me playing it and it got lost in the move, lacking the funds to replace it i never completed it.
Basically, the character Aeris of Final Fantasy VII has her name spelt as I've spelt it, Aeris. However, there was a translation error when the English language copies were produced during localisation and the spelling came out as Aerith. Ever since, Square Enix has actually said it's meant to be Aeris and that spelling is used in all official merchandise, including English copies of sequels and related media. Despite this, some idiots still like to use 'Aerith' as the spelling, which is petty but still annoying. In Kingdom Hearts they used the spelling 'Aerith', which grated on many people's nerves, mine included. I know it's petty, but still...scotth266 said:
And don't worry, I never played FF VII either. Would like to though, very much...
A graphically updated remake would have sold better then a virtual copy.
In my opinion they should have re-released games like Vagrant Story or more obscure games that have grown in more cultish popularity that would be praised and bought probably in a larger number than FF7 copy will be.
I'm probably entirely wrong here but without any new content won't the people that already own the game have zero incentive to rebuy the virtual copy? What then they expect a graphic junkie age of gamers to appreciate and judge a game that at it's time was considered a pinnacle of gaming?
This is just going to cause another series of flame wars...
In my opinion they should have re-released games like Vagrant Story or more obscure games that have grown in more cultish popularity that would be praised and bought probably in a larger number than FF7 copy will be.
I'm probably entirely wrong here but without any new content won't the people that already own the game have zero incentive to rebuy the virtual copy? What then they expect a graphic junkie age of gamers to appreciate and judge a game that at it's time was considered a pinnacle of gaming?
This is just going to cause another series of flame wars...
This could just be Wikipedia being stupid, butTrivun said:
If that's true, then Aeris came first and Aerith was the correction.Aerith's original Japanese name is エアリス (Earisu) [eaɺ̠is(ɯ] Aerith (Japanese).ogg listen (help·info). This has been transliterated to "Aeris" in Final Fantasy VII and Final Fantasy Tactics, but later as "Aerith". Both transliterations have basis, as the Japanese "su" (ス
Actually, while the port itself was painfully slow in a baffling display of stupidity, some plot important scenes were redone, this time as animated and voiced FMVs. Which is what I thought the guy I pointed this out to was asking about, not scenes that completely change the plot.harhol said:
Actually, it's the other way around. "Aeris" was the translation error in the English language copy of Final Fantasy VII, while "Aerith" was what it was supposed to be.Trivun said:
I'm so happy right now! I bet a remake will still happen within 10 years though. Square has a history of re-releasing final fantasy games over and over again. If there's money to be made in a remake, they'll make it.
Why do I get the itchy feeling that Square Enix is trying to trick people into buying this, thinking it's a remake?
Wether or not it's a remake (I highly doubt it is as Square HAS stated that they will not be remaking FFVII, back when they did the PS3 unveiling at E3), I am excited about this. I may even consider buying a PS3 now, as there are a few games coming out that I do wish to play.
