Commentary on ?Baelor?

Recommended Videos

JWRosser

New member
Jul 4, 2006
1,365
0
0
Dirty Apple said:
JWRosser said:
I haven't read the books (I feel I should now), so I did not know what was coming at the end.
This is what I wanted to hear. I was really curious whether or not the surprise would translate into the live version or not. I'm happy that it did.

I eagerly await to read about your or anyone's reactions to the series future blindsides. They are cruel and glorious.


(Wait... does that make them gruel??)
A friend of mine who has read the books said don't get too attached to any of the characters...haha.
I also realised about 3 episodes in that they are not shy of death. I find the series very hard to predict - I mean, I would have classed Ned as the main character, and now this has happened so...yeah. That's a compliment to George R. R. Martin too; he's obviously a talented writer who does not conform to clichés.
 

itf cho

Custom title? Bah! oh wait...
Jul 8, 2010
269
0
0
JWRosser said:
I haven't read the books (I feel I should now)...
I read the first three before I gave up due to the publishing delays... But I'm wondering the same thing - if I should give them another chance. Book 5 is coming out soon; and it's probably a safe bet that HBO wouldn't take on the series without some sort of guarantee that GRRM will get of his ass and write.

Plenty of people who have read the entire series so far? What's the verdict?
 

Falseprophet

New member
Jan 13, 2009
1,381
0
0
Greg Tito said:
When I read the story way back in 1996, I couldn't believe the words my eyes were seeing. Martin expertly sets up how Stark might survive the ordeal, and, being familiar with fantasy tropes, I assumed that he would make it out of the book alive. But all of that hope leaked out onto the steps of the Sept of Baelor when Ned's head. I had to reread the scene several times before I said to myself, "Holy shit. He's dead."
Exactly the same thing happened to me. I take it as GRRM basically saying, "you know those fantasy novels where the noble, honourable guy suffers for his honour but in the end is vindicated? Yeah, this isn't one of those." The grim & gritty isn't just an aesthetic for Martin--he's committed to it.

JWRosser said:
Also, big gutted that one of my favourite characters is gone. And Sean Bean, I think, is a tremendous actor.
Well, as a huge Sean Bean fan, I knew that except for Sharpe, Bravo Two-Zero and Ronin (which was a subversion of his usual "heavy" roles), he usually gets typecast in two types of roles: villains (GoldenEye, National Treasure), or noble but doomed heroes (Equilibrium). As Boromir he even got to do both in the same movie (his death scene in Fellowship is one of the few times a movie ever brought me to tears). But he tends not to live to the end of the story.

So when I saw he was cast as Eddard Stark, I thought, "Damn, he'll be dead by the end of the season. But damn if they didn't cast the finest possible actor for that role." I felt pretty good about the production after that, and am really happy to see HBO didn't disappoint.
 

MetalDooley

Cwipes!!!
Feb 9, 2010
2,054
0
1
Country
Ireland
Great episode.The portrayal of Walder Frey and the Twins was spot on I thought.Just a couple of things that didn't sit right with me though

1.Tyrion being knocked out really seemed like a bad excuse not to show the battle.As several others have mentioned he killed several men and captured a knight before being injured.Not showing that seems like a disservice to his character as he proves in the books that depite his stature he's capable of fighting when necessary

2.The diversionary army.Robb talks about sending 2000 men to their graves and while in the books they were defeated they were not wiped out yet there is no mention of survivors in the show.This army goes on to later capture Harrenhal(also I'm pretty sure it was larger than 2000 in the books)

3.No mention of Roose Bolton who led the second army.A man picked by Robb because "he frightens me".Bolton may be a minor character but he does have a significant role to play later on
 

pepitko

New member
Sep 23, 2009
126
0
0
I haven't read the books, but what keeps the show going is that it takes quite unexpected twists and turns, that pretty much rules out any possibility of guessing who dies next. I mean who would have thought that the mighty Drogo would be put down by what looked like a scratch. Good stuff, I'm glad Escapist has coverage of the series, good to read other people's feelings about the latest developments.
 

RandV80

New member
Oct 1, 2009
1,506
0
0
MetalDooley said:
Great episode.The portrayal of Walder Frey and the Twins was spot on I thought.Just a couple of things that didn't sit right with me though

1.Tyrion being knocked out really seemed like a bad excuse not to show the battle.As several others have mentioned he killed several men and captured a knight before being injured.Not showing that seems like a disservice to his character as he proves in the books that depite his stature he's capable of fighting when necessary

2.The diversionary army.Robb talks about sending 2000 men to their graves and while in the books they were defeated they were not wiped out yet there is no mention of survivors in the show.This army goes on to later capture Harrenhal(also I'm pretty sure it was larger than 2000 in the books)

3.No mention of Roose Bolton who led the second army.A man picked by Robb because "he frightens me".Bolton may be a minor character but he does have a significant role to play later on
For #2 they really simplified the battle strategy here. In HBO Rob simply sent 2000 men to their deaths as a diversion, while the rest went after Jamie. The weakness here is it's not going to take 30,000 long to beat 2000, so at best it should do little more than slow Tywin down by an hour or two. Then what's worse, there is now no longer an army standing between Tywin and the North. Roose Bolton on the other hand will certainly be cast for season two, I'm guessing they'll make them be a few hundred survivors that stick around to harass Tywin until they can take Harrenhall.

Now the more complex but legit strategy Robb used in the book, he didn't send 2000 men against tywin, he sent 18,000 (remember they gained 3000-4000 soldiers from Lord Frey). Hey sent his entire infantry against Tywin, led by the cunning Roose Bolton with orders to more or less play it safe, poke the lion then retreat. This creates a real threat to keep Tywin in place. To Riverrun, he Robb lead all of his calvary. First they faked a small raiding party, knowing that Jamie would be itching for a fight and would lead a small force out to personally take care of the pests. This was the battle of the Whispering Woods, where Robb ambushed and annihilated Jamie. With the head cut off they then launched a quick surprise attack on each of the 3 isolated Lannister encampments besieging Riverrun. I'd imagine they could take two by surprise, and by the time the 3rd knew what was going on the defenders could sally forth from the castle for a pincer attack.

So it's far better in the book, but I'm not going to complain as that's the nature of TV to simplify these things.
 

Ne1butme

New member
Nov 16, 2009
491
0
0
Jamboxdotcom said:
Jandau said:
However, this episode highlights the one glaring weakness of HBO productions: They always skip the battle scenes if at all possible. Take a look at Rome or The Tudors - the always cut off before a battle, at most we might see a few blurred images of it, and then it cuts back in to the battlefield strewn with corpses. They skipped two battles in this episode, the one where Tywin massacres the northeners and the one where Jaime gets captured.
Well, to be fair, even the books gloss over the battles. Tywin's battles to which you refer are only mentioned after the fact, and even the Whispering Wood is only given a couple pages, and that from Catelyn's perspective. Really, this isn't a hack-n-slash fantasy series ala R.A. Salvatore (i'd actually debate calling it fantasy at all, but that's just me...). It's far more about characters and intrigue.
I hope they save up money for next year specifically for Blackwater.
 

PseudoDuck

Bacon Robot
Oct 18, 2009
148
0
0
The Diabolical Biz said:
There are actually a lot of theories about that (read: 3), the most convincing of which isn't what you think. Summarised best here, if you don't mind spoilers:

http://www.towerofthehand.com/essays/chrisholden/jon_snows_parents.html
You just blew my mind!

A credible theory that Rhaegar and Lyanna could be Jon's true parents. The evidence presented may be subtle, but damn if it didn't send a chill down my spine.
 

The Diabolical Biz

New member
Jun 25, 2009
1,620
0
0
PseudoDuck said:
The Diabolical Biz said:
There are actually a lot of theories about that (read: 3), the most convincing of which isn't what you think. Summarised best here, if you don't mind spoilers:

http://www.towerofthehand.com/essays/chrisholden/jon_snows_parents.html
You just blew my mind!

A credible theory that Rhaegar and Lyanna could be Jon's true parents. The evidence presented may be subtle, but damn if it didn't send a chill down my spine.
I had exactly the same feeling. Plus it makes one of my favourite characters seem even more significant
As it lends credence to the theory that Jon is the 'Prince Who Was Promised'

Also reading all that evidence it felt like something that had been nagging at the back of my mind for the whole series just...clicked.
 

El_Ganso

New member
Jun 7, 2010
26
0
0
I know it's been said before, but I just wanted to share my thoughts :)

In book one the only fighting we ever see was Tyrion's small part before he got wounded, and even then we don't actually see how the battle is going until someone retells the whole battle to Tyrion when he regains consciousness.

The battle of the whispering woods is told from the perspective of Catelyn, and we only know what happens because Rob's knights come back and start boasting about how the King Slayer took down some men trying to get to Rob.

As readers we experience the battles indirectly, and the very few battles we experience as they happen don't tell the whole story, even the battle at Kings Landing is only told until Tyrion once again gets knocked out, and then we know the conclusion second hand thanks to other characters.

I'm not expecting HBO to give us a whole battle, but I do hope we get to see the massive amounts of boats burning in the river :D
 

Slycne

Tank Ninja
Feb 19, 2006
3,422
0
0
Thesreyn said:
Battles are expensive. GoT has a budget of something like 60-80 million for 10 episodes. LotR had several hundred million for a couple of hours.
Well bare in mind there are a lot of other factors to a production than just length. The Lord of the Rings trilogy was shot on traditional Super 35mm film where as Game of Thrones is shot on newer/cheaper Arri Alexa digital cameras. I also remember reading somewhere that Game of Thrones was reusing some sets from another show.

Certainly Game of Thrones is operating on a tighter budget overall though.

---​

With regards to the battle discussion, I was a little disappointed to not see scenes of combat in this episode. Even their write out didn't quite make sense, why is Tyrion being carried on a cart through the battleground if he was knocked out in camp? Unless the mountain tribes were really that determined to keep him around, but they didn't seem to mind him going off to breakfast with lords or partying in his tent with Bron and Shae.

I also felt it was another sly prod from Martin, though this understandably might not have worked well for TV. Most of our first-hand battle experiences are delivered by the least capable character in that regard: not Robb, Jaime, Loras, etc but instead the crippled dwarf Tyrion.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,210
0
0
To those saying that HBO can't do good battles, I say bullshit. Rome season 2 had a fantastic fight scene for the death of Brutus. And the recent Pillars of the Earth was full of carnage. There's no reason they couldn't have shown us some of the fight.
 

ThaBenMan

Mandalorian Buddha
Mar 6, 2008
3,682
0
0
I was wondering where this week's discussion was - I was thinking maybe Greg was too choked up about Ned to write it ;)

Ned's execution scene was perfection - they handled it extremely well. And I really liked the added bit of Ned seeing Arya and getting Yoren to grab her. It sucks that we must say goodbye to Sean Bean, he did a phenomenal job.

I was a little disappointed with the Battle of the Green Fork and the Whispering Wood, I was looking forward to those. But, thinking about it, I kind of like what happened with Tyrion - him getting knocked out but making his father think he fought valiantly is much more the Imp's style than the rather ridiculous stuff he does in the book. Although, did Tyrion fight after all? Why else would he be on a cart carrying the dead and wounded if he was still back in the camp? I was a bit confused by that.
And the Whispering Wood I was a little less bothered with - it pretty much was like in the book, with Catelyn a ways off and only hearing the fighting. But it would have been cool to see Jaime trying to cut his way through to Robb and then finally being subdued.
Oh well, at least we had the sweet fight between Ser Jorah and one of Drogo's blood riders.

And I really liked the Aemon Targaryen reveal, too (and Longclaw!). I wasn't too impressed with the actor for Maester Aemon before, but he did great in this scene.

*sigh* only one more episode ;_;
 

EMFCRACKSHOT

Not quite Cthulhu
May 25, 2009
2,973
0
0
The Diabolical Biz said:
There are actually a lot of theories about that (read: 3), the most convincing of which isn't what you think. Summarised best here, if you don't mind spoilers:

http://www.towerofthehand.com/essays/chrisholden/jon_snows_parents.html

OT: Damn. That scene...it cut deep, man, that was a tear-jerker!

Also I agree with the chappie up there, if they skip the climactic battle of CoK, I will be really, really disappoint HBO.
Wow, that really is quite an incredible insight. The third theory comes right out of the blue, but it makes so much sense. its really convincing. My mind is quite literally blown.
And even now, whenever i read that scene in the book i still start to well up a bit. The first time i actually cried. And i don't know why, but seeing it there on tv just made it seem so much more real.
Regardless, i think ned retained his honour, both in regard to jon and his decision to "confess to his treason"
 

Ancientgamer

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,346
0
0
Thesreyn said:
Battles are expensive. GoT has a budget of something like 60-80 million for 10 episodes. LotR had several hundred million for a couple of hours.

I was annoyed that the battles got cut out too, as well as the re-arranging of the storyline in order to create a cliff hanger/shocking ending but I can forgive them for both. The former because budget constraints are always a problem (and hopefully season 2 will have a much better budget), the second because it made better television for those who are yet to read the books.

I must say though, the scene with Tyrion, Bronn, Shae, the drinking game and Tyrion's story is much better than the book. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Actually, the budget for each of the LotR films was only about 80 million. I just bring it up cause I was surprised when I learned it, but your point still stands.
 

Lex Darko

New member
Aug 13, 2006
244
0
0
Quotes:
vivaldiscool said:
Thesreyn said:
Battles are expensive. GoT has a budget of something like 60-80 million for 10 episodes. LotR had several hundred million for a couple of hours.

I was annoyed that the battles got cut out too, as well as the re-arranging of the storyline in order to create a cliff hanger/shocking ending but I can forgive them for both. The former because budget constraints are always a problem (and hopefully season 2 will have a much better budget), the second because it made better television for those who are yet to read the books.

I must say though, the scene with Tyrion, Bronn, Shae, the drinking game and Tyrion's story is much better than the book. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Actually, the budget for each of the LotR films was only about 80 million. I just bring it up cause I was surprised when I learned it, but your point still stands.

Well that would mean that LotR has a budget that is 4 times larger per hour than what AGoT has with HBO. If the 3 movies had an approx. budget of 240 million and had about 10 hours of footage and this series has about 60 million for their 10 hours.

OT: To be completely honest after I watched first episode I went to the wiki for ASOIAF and found out who lived and died. When I learned that Eddard and well basically every character that could logically die pretty much does die; I went and got the 4 audio books and listened to them all over the course of 2 weeks.

This series really has made me realize just how programed we can be into thinking that our stories will always have the moral, upright, honorable hero winning in the end. Like little finger says to Sansa in AGoT ch 44 "Life is not a song you may learn that one day to your sorrow." And if you think she's sorrowful now, heh it get much much worse for her.

But after reading all the books I would say that the story wouldn't work if Ned Stark didn't die.

If he was just sent to wall there is really no logical reason for him not to go to Winterfell instead and essential take command of Robb's war effort brokering a peace between the Baratheon brothers and taking king's landing.

This would make Dany's story almost completely irrelevant because a Westeros with a Ned Stark as warden of the North, and with Stannis Baratheon on the iron throne that's supported by Renly (storm's end) and High Garden; the seven kingdoms couldn't be threatened by a 15 year old girl with an army of freed slaves and old people.
 

rickthetrick

New member
Jun 19, 2009
532
0
0
Slycne said:
Thesreyn said:
Battles are expensive. GoT has a budget of something like 60-80 million for 10 episodes. LotR had several hundred million for a couple of hours.
Well bare in mind there are a lot of other factors to a production than just length. The Lord of the Rings trilogy was shot on traditional Super 35mm film where as Game of Thrones is shot on newer/cheaper Arri Alexa digital cameras. I also remember reading somewhere that Game of Thrones was reusing some sets from another show.

Certainly Game of Thrones is operating on a tighter budget overall though.

---​

With regards to the battle discussion, I was a little disappointed to not see scenes of combat in this episode. Even their write out didn't quite make sense, why is Tyrion being carried on a cart through the battleground if he was knocked out in camp? Unless the mountain tribes were really that determined to keep him around, but they didn't seem to mind him going off to breakfast with lords or partying in his tent with Bron and Shae.

I also felt it was another sly prod from Martin, though this understandably might not have worked well for TV. Most of our first-hand battle experiences are delivered by the least capable character in that regard: not Robb, Jaime, Loras, etc but instead the crippled dwarf Tyrion.
Heck they probably threw him at their enemies!

I'm kind of hoping they get a higher budget to work with for season two, and onward.
You have epic battles, and special effects to consider.
Heck I'm wondering how the very last scene of this season will be handled.
You know what I mean. Dany and the cough cough...oh sorry had something in my throat there.