Console Gaming

Mister Benoit

New member
Sep 19, 2008
992
0
0
drummond13 said:
I think this is a great idea. But why is Movie Bob a part of it? Can it just be Yahtzee and James?
Bob has a show over on www.screwattack.com called the GameOverthinker which is really awesome if you've never checked it out, the earlier episodes are on Youtube.

Seriously go check it out, if you like videogame relates rants they're awesome.
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
MovieBob:
MOTION control, on the other hand, I think has a big role to play in the future. From where I sit, the two most broadly-beneficial "how-did-we-get-by-without-this" transformative things to come out of the Wii are the two subtlest: Having a constantly-accessible onscreen "cursor" and turning "shake controller" into a third action button.

Regarding the first - when I "switch back" from using the Wii to using my 360, I INSTANTLY miss being able to click through the menu's "mouse-style" and instead having to do it all by buttons. It's as much an improvement on the console menu-interface as the mouse was for desktops. On a more me-specific level, I think it made the Metroid Prime games the best-controlling console-FPS setup ever.
Sorry but you're saying that because it mimics a mouse - which has been around on PCs for many years - it's a transformitive thing for consoles? Um... I really wouldn't give it praise for being a motion control concept. I personally believe that consoles should have a mouse and joystick peripheral for their games. It would make many of the games better to play. Now between aiming at the screen vs moving a mouse to aim, they're basically the same thing just one is more relaxed (the mouse).

In fact, that's exactly what I use on my PS3.
 

constantcompile

New member
Sep 9, 2010
61
0
0
Irridium said:
Will you be switching out contributors as time goes on? Maybe get some discussion with the dudes from LRR or perhaps Shamus Young?

Either way, this is very interesting, and I hope for more.
This is a good question. Have you emailed them at [email protected] ?

Kapol said:
Very, very interesting... I'm looking forward to seeing more of this. It seems like a good idea to get three fairly separate viewpoints and have them all discuss a subject with one another. Though I feel this one ended a bit quickly, with the end feeling fairly sudden. But then again, I've been getting that feeling from a lot of things on this site lately... videos and writing alike. Perhaps I just don't like the fact it has to end.
The quick end, I think, came mostly from the elephant in the room - motion controls - being exhausted as a topic, with each party having their own opinions drawn in the sand; because it was more of a discussion than a debate up to that point, I think MovieBob and James Portnow were unwilling to argue with Yahtzee - Portnow is a professional in the industry and has to make sure he doesn't say anything that he'll regret later, and MovieBob may have too much respect for Yahtzee to regard him as an opponent. Yahtzee's comment on private sword-arm use probably didn't help the awkwardness of the situation.

I do wish that they'd elaborated more on innovation in the industry; after motion controls were brought up as an example, it felt like they neglected all of the other potential topics for discussion - indie games on XBLA, WiiWare games, etc. Few specific games that utilized new concepts were mentioned, which I feel is a shame; I think it may stem partly from being unable to know who had played which game, and from knowing that THE innovative success of the moment - Minecraft - was off the table as a topic, because it's a PC game.

Kapol said:
As for what Moviebob said about the movie industry reaching a stale point, I think that's beginning to happen again. New ideas aren't selling very well, while movies that make the person watching it feel like they've seen it before are doing great. While I could go with the 'The King's Speech beating The Social Network argument,' I feel that's a bit unfair as The Social Network was a big money maker. Instead, I think the case of Scott Pilgrim is more appropriate, where it's a movie with an unusual artistic direction, story, and overall feel to it, it lost to movies that the audience knew they would like. The same could be said about the movie industry now as the game industry: people aren't willing to risk their money on anything they aren't sure about, so the new ideas don't make enough money to be worthwhile to the company. If it isn't already there, it seems to be heading that way at least.
I think the affliction that you're talking about is that Hollywood is still making movies for theaters rather than Netflix - still aiming for people that buy into marketing rather than seeing past it. I think that, like music, the distribution of movies is in a transitional phase, and like music, the producers are years behind where the costumers are. In my opinion, the market seems to be gravitating towards a decentralized system where people find what they like rather than obeying instructions of what to like, and are willing to pay less, but buy more.

I think that all forms of media production are becoming less oligopolistic, where a few major studios dominate the entire market, and closer to a perfectly competitive market, which accepts any and all players - the barriers to entry are lower and lower with each passing year, and the communication between producers and customers edges slowly towards perfection. I think that independent producers innovating in order to produce low-budget, high-quality, low-price offerings that are very successful is an inevitability; it's just a matter of when.

Rolling Beast said:
I agree with Yahtzee when he says that motion controls aren't quite there yet, resulting in a less immersive experience. Also just give me a "run"-button and I'm ready to shoot/swordfight while being immersed and sitting on the couch. As long as I can do everything from there It'll enhance my gaming-experience in the right way. What my living-room lacks most - and I asume that goes for a lot of us - is space and in the end, that's what takes me out from a game-world the most.
If Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft have been paying attention at all, they have surely heard your complaint many times. I do think it's possible to achieve an immersive experience with motion controls, but in my own opinion, the motion itself must be the goal, not the result of the motion. Two of the Wii's most successful titles - Wii Sports and Wii Fit - are such because people liked the *method* of play, not the goal or context of play. People want to swing bats, and punch air, and do pushups, and keep their balance. But this is *not* the same desire as wanting to kill monsters.

The people who care about motion care about their own fitness and exertion, not about escapism. Once the industry realizes that, we'll see a lot of games that will encourage and reward you for getting off the couch.

Jabberwock xeno said:
TheBobmus said:
I approve of this.
Please make this weekly! :)
Seconded.

Also, not a single bashing of Halo, YAY!

I'd bay to see this stuff evry week, but I don't have money to pay you guys. I would if I did though.
Tell them that! [email protected] . Forums are mainly for readers discussing articles with other readers; if you want people working at the escapist to listen to you, email is your best bet.

Mr. Omega said:
I agree with Bob's point about shaking the controller working like a third button (if done right, it does add a nice little touch), but also think Yahtzee is right in that making the player exert a lot kind of defeats the purpose. In other words, little shakes, but not full on waving, is the best way to handle motion controls.
Yahtzee hit on this before; small motions are a fun novelty, but mostly because they are an accurate and fast method of input - the more complex or precise the action must be, the greater chance of misinterpretation by the hardware - the more immersion lost.

shogunblade said:
I guess my only issue I am having is that I have no idea who James (Portnow) is. I know who his little character is from the show, but otherwise it was a very interesting roundtable.
James Portnow's proper introduction was halfway through the first mailbag episode of Extra Credits: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/extra-credits/2216-Mailbag-1

Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
brodie21 said:
if there IS a direct neural interface, then we will have an inception-like problem, with people not able to tell that they are in a game or not....
That's why you would have to have a hud.
If our technology reaches the point of having a neural interface, there is NO REASON why we shouldn't be able to have a hud outside of the game. I want this.

Nocta-Aeterna said:
As for James Portnow's last point on the immersion of games thorugh motion controls: Ive said it once, and I'll say it again: Upgrade the Kinect's precision so we can use non-tiring combinations of simple hand gestures for spell-casting.
I have yet to execute a virtual kamehameha that doesn't involve a controller of some kind. This is an injustice and must be remedied.

Fanghawk said:
I was just thinking last week that it would be great to see more Escapist crossovers, kinda like Doomsday Acade and the ZP/Unskippable "visit" episodes did back in the day. I look forward to reading more, and seeing if anyone else will add contributions.

That actually brings up an interesting thought: for the occasional episode, could you have an industry guest that Yahtzee, MovieBob, and James could discuss/debate with? I'd love it if we could get Tim Schafer or Jason West in a chat with the Escapist crew....

Actually my dream would be if Bobby Kotick would sit down with them for a video episode, but in the interest of civil discourse, perhaps that should held off for a while. :D
I highly doubt Kotick would do anything for the industry that doesn't have a guaranteed immediate payoff for his wallet and his incompetence. That said, again, email the escapist to say that at [email protected] .

carnkhan4 said:
It's interesting how sci-fi gaming is divided between super-active holodecks and super-static gaming matrix style...
A lot of games seem to be aiming for a combination of the two, which I disagree with. We need to have established industry examples of perfect "active" games and perfect "inactive" games before trying to nail down what would make a good combination; the guesses that are being made so far aren't doing anything for anyone.
 

Ulquiorra4sama

Saviour In the Clockwork
Feb 2, 2010
1,786
0
0
I have to agree with Yahtzee about how a player will usually be immersed in the gameplay. And, really, i think James has got the best way around words and writing so i kinda felt like i was agreeing with him a lot, but in retrospect i didn't agree on this point.

Loved reading this either way and i'm hopeing we'll get to see discussions like this at some later point.
 

drakythe

New member
Feb 10, 2011
203
0
0
I love this idea for a regular column. PLEASE keep it.

OT: for years I have been looking to computer gaming, mostly the freeware/indie scene for anything "new" or different (the recent humble indie bundles showed off a LOT of creativity). The PC has enough cheap development tools that it can be really easy for a single person to innovate something extraordinary (yeah, we're all thinking 'minecraft!'). I think though until a cheaper development route is achieved for PSN/WiiWare/XBLA we'll continue to see only limited "new" ideas on any of those platforms.

And as far as the motion controls go. Uhm, can I vote both? I don't see why regular gamepad gaming shouldn't be viable for pretty much all games, especially if motion control becomes more prevalent. If for no other reason than physically handicapped gamers.
 

lozfoe444

New member
Aug 26, 2009
189
0
0
I hope we get more of these. Maybe once every couple of weeks.

I'm not sure who I agree with more on the whole motion control thing. I just know that we're going to get a lot more of it in the future. Eiji Aonuma said that he wants 1:1 sword play in every future Zelda game from now on. It's not leaving any time soon.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
A Nintendo fanboy
a highbrow games as art advocate and
a game critic for the common man.

My expectations were met. Incline of the lowest common denominator.
 

Chris^^

New member
Mar 11, 2009
770
0
0
gotta agree with Yahtzee insofar as controllers allow much faster responses than movement does, I'm of the opinion that if motion controls do really kick off they should still be optional on the PS3/360 as they're the home for more 'serious' gamers who'll desperately resent the removal of controllers on new releases. I know I would and I'm not even that dedicated a gamer..
 

Speakercone

New member
May 21, 2010
480
0
0
Wolfram01 said:
MovieBob:
MOTION control,
what is that and where can I get twelve? :D

Also, I'm in total agreement with Yahtzee's last point on motion control. I got the Wii early on to play Zelda: Twilight Princess (one of my favourites, glad I got it), and found that using the sword was rather strange-feeling as I was suddenly aware of my living room. This is the thing with motion, when you move, you become aware of those physical objects in your surroundings. If your aim is immersion, this is the opposite of what you want.
 

Dice Warwick

New member
Nov 29, 2010
81
0
0
@Yahtzee If you read the manga/novel "1/2 Prince" The MMORPG that the characters play, they play when they go to sleep. So much of their time gaming takes plays when the body is at full rest, that's probably what your thinking about in your ending statement.

As for my thoughts; a lot of new tech is showing that you don't ecentuly need a console to play good videogames. People are doing this big time with the I-phon, and I-pad, but it also looks like other groups starting to jump onto the ban wagon too, just not in a big way yet. The Xbox-360 has the potential to evolve; with all the games in the Xbox Live marketplace, it could easily have a hand-held that let's you download from your 360. Also it be a good idea if Microsoft dropped the Kinect as the "BIG THING" and turn it into a support; play the game with the controller, but use the Kinect like a moue, think about it.

I can't say much about the other two consoles, I only have the money to support gaming on one, and that too is a problem from what I can see. When the Next Generation two things come to mind, one is that they will be a more robust versions of the previous gen's, two I won't have the money to burn to afford them. So I see myself still playing my 360 for years, like how I still played my PS2 for years after the release of the 360.
 

Dice Warwick

New member
Nov 29, 2010
81
0
0
Speakercone said:
Wolfram01 said:
MovieBob:
MOTION control,
what is that and where can I get twelve? :D

Also, I'm in total agreement with Yahtzee's last point on motion control. I got the Wii early on to play Zelda: Twilight Princess (one of my favourites, glad I got it), and found that using the sword was rather strange-feeling as I was suddenly aware of my living room. This is the thing with motion, when you move, you become aware of those physical objects in your surroundings. If your aim is immersion, this is the opposite of what you want.
I play my games on my bed, looking up at my TV, eather sitting, or laying down, but never standing. If I had swing my controller around like a sword, I would be endanger of knocking one of my real swords down onto me. The motion controls force the player to play in a open area instead of "anywhere they damn well please" so for people use to playing games in "their" small area, it's going to feel out of place.
 

Tempest13

New member
Aug 23, 2010
186
0
0
I don't know, while someone could easily argue for buttons over motions, I agree with Bob that the simple shaking control for things such as Mario's spin and Donkey's ground pound are simple and intuitive additions to the game that don't interrupt the flow at all. And it's things like that that still give me faith for the future.
 

lazinesslord

New member
Jun 13, 2010
153
0
0
My mind has just been blown. THAT WAS AWESOME!!!
Now that it got that out of the way I'd like to say that this was a very interesting topic on the state of console gaming.